You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Judicial Court for further review. Thanks.<br />
THE MODERATOR: Okay, Mr. Finneran.<br />
MR. FINNERAN: Yes, Mr. Moderator, through you to Mr.<br />
McNamara. I have a neighbor who spent tens <strong>of</strong> thousands <strong>of</strong> dollars<br />
battling a situation similar to Mr. DeWitt’s. It was on 209 and 209A Trotting<br />
Park Road. Can someone tell me how this would affect that property?<br />
that?<br />
THE MODERATOR: Mr. McNamara, are you able to answer<br />
MR. MCNAMARA: Mr. Moderator, I’m sorry, I can’t. I’m not<br />
familiar specifically with that parcel.<br />
THE MODERATOR: Okay, actually, Mr. McNamara, you<br />
were next on the list. And then Mr. Latimer.<br />
MR. MCNAMARA: Thank you, Mr. Moderator. Just a couple<br />
<strong>of</strong> corrections. I don’t want to leave you thinking some things that Mr.<br />
DeWitt left you with.<br />
First <strong>of</strong> all, this idea <strong>of</strong> a seven or ten year protection. One <strong>of</strong><br />
the things I mentioned was the Land Court talked about multiple dwellings<br />
on a lot is a use. There is no such protection for uses. The protection Mr.<br />
DeWitt mentions is protection for an illegal structure that may have existed<br />
for seven or ten years. We’re talking not here about a ro<strong>of</strong> on a building,<br />
we’re talking about a use, so there is no protection.<br />
Mr. DeWitt suggests that the ZBA ignores <strong>Town</strong> Meeting.<br />
Tinkham Reporting<br />
(508) 759-9162<br />
1-<br />
50
Change language