You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
there, accessible, find-able? To almost not find a two inch contract that’s<br />
only a decade old, I find it hard to believe that we’re going to rest the<br />
protection <strong>of</strong> 200 some-odd properties on the potential <strong>of</strong> finding<br />
documents that are more than 50 years old. Thank you.<br />
THE MODERATOR: Okay. Gentleman to my right. Yes, Mr.<br />
Medeiros. If you can use that, yes.<br />
MR. MEDEIROS: Hi, my name’s Kenneth Medeiros. I’m a<br />
member <strong>of</strong> the Planning Board, and I’m here specifically to talk about this<br />
article. There’s been a lot <strong>of</strong> confusion, I think, thrown out about this. This<br />
is pretty simple. This Article is only here to restore the property rights <strong>of</strong><br />
230-plus homeowners. What has happened is a judge said, just like Mr.<br />
Sherman got up and said, took their rights away. These people and<br />
properties have paid taxes since 1926 on these homes. What this is<br />
saying is that they now have rights just like anybody else in this room that<br />
owns a house in this town.<br />
This is not about condominiums. It’s not about affordable<br />
housing. I think it’s getting spun-up about that, but I want <strong>Town</strong> Meeting<br />
Members to know that this is purely and completely only for those 230<br />
people. It’s to give them the rights, just like you, so you can get a<br />
mortgage, so you can sell your property, or you can transfer your property<br />
to your children.<br />
What this has said is it’s illegal. So that also means – think<br />
Tinkham Reporting<br />
(508) 759-9162<br />
1-<br />
61