EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL ... - Bilkent University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

11. Stronach 1957:93, fig. 2/7. 12. Schiek-Fisher 1965: fig.11. 13. Stronach 1957:91, fig. 1/3. 14. Stronach 1957:91, fig. 1/14. 15. Müller-Karpe 1974: Taf. 171/5.11. 16. Müller-Karpe 1974: Taf. 290/17. 17. Müller-Karpe 1974: Taf. 179/9. 18. Bilgi 1990: 213, fig. 14/183. 19. Stronach 1957:91, fig.1/18. 20. Bilgi 1984: 85, fig.8/8. 21. Bilgi 1990: 214, fig.15/195. 22. Özgüç 1948: lev.I/2. 23. Schiek-Fisher 1965: fig.15. 24. Harmankaya 1973: fig.40/4. 25. Bilgi 1984: 90, fig. 13/58. 26. Koşay-Turfan 1959: fig. 409. 27. Woolley 1952: fig. 60/a.c. 28. Müller-Karpe 1994: Taf. 89/d/6. 29. Müller-Karpe 1974: Taf.171/12. 30. Nikolova 1999:305, fig.10-11. 31. Müller-Karpe 1974: Taf. 171/1-2.9-10. 32. Chernykh 1992:108, Fig. 34/6. 100
AHLATLIBEL: Ankara district. Type II a Cat. No: 1 APENDIX D CATALOG Funerary context. Bronze dagger with broad central flange. Length: 28cm. Round shoulders with a single rivet on tang. Tentative date: ca. 2400 B.C. (Stronach 1957). Stronach 1957:93, fig. 3/2. Yakar 1985:34. 101
Page 1 and 2:
EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS I
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I am
Page 7 and 8:
3.5 Chronological Labels………
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The beginnin
Page 11 and 12:
Western Europe which covers a time
Page 13 and 14:
There are a limited number of excav
Page 15 and 16:
chronology shows the existence of w
Page 17 and 18:
2.1 Definition Nevertheless, a simp
Page 19 and 20:
It should be accepted, at least the
Page 21 and 22:
3.1 Chronological Limits of Early B
Page 23 and 24:
accepted as belonging to the second
Page 25 and 26:
If this is taken as a starting poin
Page 27 and 28:
The majority of the dagger finds in
Page 29 and 30:
4.2 The Key Sites in Central Anatol
Page 31 and 32:
evidence cannot be taken as a defin
Page 33 and 34:
dated to the second half of the thi
Page 35 and 36:
Hans Henning Von der Osten suggeste
Page 37 and 38:
Depata with red cross decoration fi
Page 39 and 40:
intentionally mutilating metal vess
Page 41 and 42:
elations between Kültepe and Troy.
Page 43 and 44:
Phase III in Polatlı is characteri
Page 45 and 46:
place. This is most obvious by the
Page 47 and 48:
destroyed in Anatolia and none of t
Page 49 and 50:
of Yazır Höyük, Demirci Höyük
Page 51 and 52:
CHAPTER V CENTRAL ANATOLIAN DAGGER
Page 53 and 54:
and Önder Bilgi (1989), does not c
Page 55 and 56:
Type Ic1 A dagger from the Ankara C
Page 57 and 58: has a wooden core wrapped in electr
Page 59 and 60: Type IId The flat midrib’s edges
Page 61 and 62: and Type IVb (Cat. No: 20), come fr
Page 63 and 64: 5.8 Type VII The only example of a
Page 65 and 66: 6.1 Pontic Interactions When the ge
Page 67 and 68: 39). Yenihayat is not a formaly exc
Page 69 and 70: A shaft-hole axe hammer; a mace hea
Page 71 and 72: of such a dagger in the Central Ana
Page 73 and 74: daggers were, without a question, e
Page 75 and 76: Some of the Yenihayat daggers’ mi
Page 77 and 78: egional variance in the production
Page 79 and 80: No.71-71), without an illustration,
Page 81 and 82: Black Sea region. It is not a contr
Page 83 and 84: lades have wide midrib; sloping sho
Page 85 and 86: With the advancement of archaeometa
Page 87 and 88: Similarly, there are cultural conne
Page 89 and 90: Another benefit of experimental arc
Page 91 and 92: -----. 1984. “Metal Objects from
Page 93 and 94: Lloyd, Seton, Howard Frederick, and
Page 95 and 96: Reade, J. 2001. “Assyrian King-Li
Page 97 and 98: Yalçın, Ü. 2010. “ Alacahöyü
Page 104 and 105: Fig. 1 APPENDIX C FIGURES 96
Page 106 and 107: . Fig. 22 Fig. 26 Fig. 18 Fig. 19 F
Page 110 and 111: Type IId Type II b Cat. No: 4 Cat.
Page 112 and 113: Type I f1 Type I F2 Cat. No: 7 Fune
Page 114 and 115: Çadır Höyük Type I c Cat. No: 1
Page 116 and 117: Type I c Type IV a1 Type IVb Cat. N
Page 118 and 119: Type II a1 Cat. No: 24 Kalınkaya n
Page 120 and 121: POLATLI: Ankara province. Type II c
Page 122 and 123: YAZILIKAYA: Afyon province. Type I
Page 124 and 125: Type V b Type II a2 Type II a1 Cat.
Page 126 and 127: Type I c2 Type ? Type III a Cat. No
Page 128: Type I a Cat. No: 47 Sadberk Hanım
show all

EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL ... - Bilkent University

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?