EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL ... - Bilkent University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Adapted from T. Efe, 1983: 117. APPENDIX A CHRONOLOGY CHART 90
Page 1 and 2:
EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS I
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I am
Page 7 and 8:
3.5 Chronological Labels………
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The beginnin
Page 11 and 12:
Western Europe which covers a time
Page 13 and 14:
There are a limited number of excav
Page 15 and 16:
chronology shows the existence of w
Page 17 and 18:
2.1 Definition Nevertheless, a simp
Page 19 and 20:
It should be accepted, at least the
Page 21 and 22:
3.1 Chronological Limits of Early B
Page 23 and 24:
accepted as belonging to the second
Page 25 and 26:
If this is taken as a starting poin
Page 27 and 28:
The majority of the dagger finds in
Page 29 and 30:
4.2 The Key Sites in Central Anatol
Page 31 and 32:
evidence cannot be taken as a defin
Page 33 and 34:
dated to the second half of the thi
Page 35 and 36:
Hans Henning Von der Osten suggeste
Page 37 and 38:
Depata with red cross decoration fi
Page 39 and 40:
intentionally mutilating metal vess
Page 41 and 42:
elations between Kültepe and Troy.
Page 43 and 44:
Phase III in Polatlı is characteri
Page 45 and 46:
place. This is most obvious by the
Page 47 and 48: destroyed in Anatolia and none of t
Page 49 and 50: of Yazır Höyük, Demirci Höyük
Page 51 and 52: CHAPTER V CENTRAL ANATOLIAN DAGGER
Page 53 and 54: and Önder Bilgi (1989), does not c
Page 55 and 56: Type Ic1 A dagger from the Ankara C
Page 57 and 58: has a wooden core wrapped in electr
Page 59 and 60: Type IId The flat midrib’s edges
Page 61 and 62: and Type IVb (Cat. No: 20), come fr
Page 63 and 64: 5.8 Type VII The only example of a
Page 65 and 66: 6.1 Pontic Interactions When the ge
Page 67 and 68: 39). Yenihayat is not a formaly exc
Page 69 and 70: A shaft-hole axe hammer; a mace hea
Page 71 and 72: of such a dagger in the Central Ana
Page 73 and 74: daggers were, without a question, e
Page 75 and 76: Some of the Yenihayat daggers’ mi
Page 77 and 78: egional variance in the production
Page 79 and 80: No.71-71), without an illustration,
Page 81 and 82: Black Sea region. It is not a contr
Page 83 and 84: lades have wide midrib; sloping sho
Page 85 and 86: With the advancement of archaeometa
Page 87 and 88: Similarly, there are cultural conne
Page 89 and 90: Another benefit of experimental arc
Page 91 and 92: -----. 1984. “Metal Objects from
Page 93 and 94: Lloyd, Seton, Howard Frederick, and
Page 95 and 96: Reade, J. 2001. “Assyrian King-Li
Page 97: Yalçın, Ü. 2010. “ Alacahöyü
Page 105 and 106: Fig. 2 Fig. 3 Fig. 4 Fig. 5 Fig. 6
Page 107 and 108: Fig.30 Figure References 1. Map. Fi
Page 109 and 110: AHLATLIBEL: Ankara district. Type I
Page 111 and 112: ALACA HÖYÜK: Black Sea Region, Ç
Page 113 and 114: ALISHAR HÖYÜK: Yozgat Type I a Ty
Page 115 and 116: HOROZTEPE: Tokat province Type II f
Page 117 and 118: Type III Type I a2 Cat. No: 22 Frag
Page 119 and 120: MECİTÖZÜ: Çorum District. Type
Page 121 and 122: RESULOĞLU CEMETERY: Çorum Provinc
Page 123 and 124: YENİHAYAT: Çorum Province. Type V
Page 125 and 126: UNCONFIRMED PROVENANCE ( Ankara Col
Page 127 and 128: UNCONFIRMED PROVENANCE (Private Col
show all

EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL ... - Bilkent University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?