- Page 1 and 2:
EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL
- Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS I
- Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I am
- Page 7 and 8:
3.5 Chronological Labels………
- Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The beginnin
- Page 11 and 12:
Western Europe which covers a time
- Page 13 and 14:
There are a limited number of excav
- Page 15 and 16:
chronology shows the existence of w
- Page 17 and 18:
2.1 Definition Nevertheless, a simp
- Page 19 and 20:
It should be accepted, at least the
- Page 21 and 22:
3.1 Chronological Limits of Early B
- Page 23 and 24:
accepted as belonging to the second
- Page 25 and 26:
If this is taken as a starting poin
- Page 27 and 28:
The majority of the dagger finds in
- Page 29 and 30:
4.2 The Key Sites in Central Anatol
- Page 31 and 32:
evidence cannot be taken as a defin
- Page 33 and 34:
dated to the second half of the thi
- Page 35 and 36:
Hans Henning Von der Osten suggeste
- Page 37 and 38:
Depata with red cross decoration fi
- Page 39 and 40:
intentionally mutilating metal vess
- Page 41 and 42:
elations between Kültepe and Troy.
- Page 43 and 44:
Phase III in Polatlı is characteri
- Page 45 and 46:
place. This is most obvious by the
- Page 47 and 48:
destroyed in Anatolia and none of t
- Page 49 and 50:
of Yazır Höyük, Demirci Höyük
- Page 51 and 52:
CHAPTER V CENTRAL ANATOLIAN DAGGER
- Page 53 and 54:
and Önder Bilgi (1989), does not c
- Page 55 and 56:
Type Ic1 A dagger from the Ankara C
- Page 57 and 58:
has a wooden core wrapped in electr
- Page 59 and 60:
Type IId The flat midrib’s edges
- Page 61 and 62: and Type IVb (Cat. No: 20), come fr
- Page 63 and 64: 5.8 Type VII The only example of a
- Page 65 and 66: 6.1 Pontic Interactions When the ge
- Page 67 and 68: 39). Yenihayat is not a formaly exc
- Page 69 and 70: A shaft-hole axe hammer; a mace hea
- Page 71 and 72: of such a dagger in the Central Ana
- Page 73 and 74: daggers were, without a question, e
- Page 75 and 76: Some of the Yenihayat daggers’ mi
- Page 77 and 78: egional variance in the production
- Page 79 and 80: No.71-71), without an illustration,
- Page 81 and 82: Black Sea region. It is not a contr
- Page 83 and 84: lades have wide midrib; sloping sho
- Page 85 and 86: With the advancement of archaeometa
- Page 87 and 88: Similarly, there are cultural conne
- Page 89 and 90: Another benefit of experimental arc
- Page 91 and 92: -----. 1984. “Metal Objects from
- Page 93 and 94: Lloyd, Seton, Howard Frederick, and
- Page 95 and 96: Reade, J. 2001. “Assyrian King-Li
- Page 97 and 98: Yalçın, Ü. 2010. “ Alacahöyü
- Page 104 and 105: Fig. 1 APPENDIX C FIGURES 96
- Page 106 and 107: . Fig. 22 Fig. 26 Fig. 18 Fig. 19 F
- Page 108 and 109: 11. Stronach 1957:93, fig. 2/7. 12.
- Page 110 and 111: Type IId Type II b Cat. No: 4 Cat.
- Page 114 and 115: Çadır Höyük Type I c Cat. No: 1
- Page 116 and 117: Type I c Type IV a1 Type IVb Cat. N
- Page 118 and 119: Type II a1 Cat. No: 24 Kalınkaya n
- Page 120 and 121: POLATLI: Ankara province. Type II c
- Page 122 and 123: YAZILIKAYA: Afyon province. Type I
- Page 124 and 125: Type V b Type II a2 Type II a1 Cat.
- Page 126 and 127: Type I c2 Type ? Type III a Cat. No
- Page 128: Type I a Cat. No: 47 Sadberk Hanım