EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL ... - Bilkent University

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Type V b Type II a2 Type II a1 Cat. No: 37 Çorum Arkeoloji Müzesi. The museum records indicate the provenance as the Yenihayat cemetery. Wide, rounded midrib. No evidence of a rivet. EBA III context. Muller-Karpe, 1994: Taf.92 Yıldırım, 2001: 1-8. Cat. No: 38 Çorum Arkeoloji Müzesi. The museum records indicate the provenance as the Yenihayat cemetery. Flat wide midrib. Wide, triangular tang with a single rivet hole. EBA III context. Muller-Karpe, 1994: Taf.92 Yıldırım, 2001: 1-8. Cat. No: 39 Çorum Arkeoloji Müzesi. The museum records indicate the provenance as the Yenihayat cemetery. Flat wide midrib. Tang with a single rivet piercing.EBA III context. Muller-Karpe, 1994: Taf.92 Yıldırım, 2001: 1-8. 116
UNCONFIRMED PROVENANCE ( Ankara Collection): Çorum –Tokat-Amasya Region. Type I c1 Type I Cat. No: 40 Unconfirmed provenance, purchased in 1965 from a private dealer in Ankara. Length: 18cm. Özgüç 1978: 91. Özgüç 1978: 92.fig.77. Cat. No: 41 Unconfirmed provenance, purchased in 1965 from a private dealer in Ankara. Length: 11.8 cm. Özgüç 1978: 91. Özgüç 1978: 92.fig.78. Cat. No: 42 Unconfirmed provenance, purchased in 1965 from a private dealer in Ankara. Length: 12 cm. Özgüç 1978: 91. Özgüç 1978: 92.fig.79 117
Page 1 and 2:
EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL
Page 3 and 4:
ABSTRACT EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS I
Page 5 and 6:
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS First of all, I am
Page 7 and 8:
3.5 Chronological Labels………
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER I INTRODUCTION The beginnin
Page 11 and 12:
Western Europe which covers a time
Page 13 and 14:
There are a limited number of excav
Page 15 and 16:
chronology shows the existence of w
Page 17 and 18:
2.1 Definition Nevertheless, a simp
Page 19 and 20:
It should be accepted, at least the
Page 21 and 22:
3.1 Chronological Limits of Early B
Page 23 and 24:
accepted as belonging to the second
Page 25 and 26:
If this is taken as a starting poin
Page 27 and 28:
The majority of the dagger finds in
Page 29 and 30:
4.2 The Key Sites in Central Anatol
Page 31 and 32:
evidence cannot be taken as a defin
Page 33 and 34:
dated to the second half of the thi
Page 35 and 36:
Hans Henning Von der Osten suggeste
Page 37 and 38:
Depata with red cross decoration fi
Page 39 and 40:
intentionally mutilating metal vess
Page 41 and 42:
elations between Kültepe and Troy.
Page 43 and 44:
Phase III in Polatlı is characteri
Page 45 and 46:
place. This is most obvious by the
Page 47 and 48:
destroyed in Anatolia and none of t
Page 49 and 50:
of Yazır Höyük, Demirci Höyük
Page 51 and 52:
CHAPTER V CENTRAL ANATOLIAN DAGGER
Page 53 and 54:
and Önder Bilgi (1989), does not c
Page 55 and 56:
Type Ic1 A dagger from the Ankara C
Page 57 and 58:
has a wooden core wrapped in electr
Page 59 and 60:
Type IId The flat midrib’s edges
Page 61 and 62:
and Type IVb (Cat. No: 20), come fr
Page 63 and 64:
5.8 Type VII The only example of a
Page 65 and 66:
6.1 Pontic Interactions When the ge
Page 67 and 68:
39). Yenihayat is not a formaly exc
Page 69 and 70:
A shaft-hole axe hammer; a mace hea
Page 71 and 72:
of such a dagger in the Central Ana
Page 73 and 74: daggers were, without a question, e
Page 75 and 76: Some of the Yenihayat daggers’ mi
Page 77 and 78: egional variance in the production
Page 79 and 80: No.71-71), without an illustration,
Page 81 and 82: Black Sea region. It is not a contr
Page 83 and 84: lades have wide midrib; sloping sho
Page 85 and 86: With the advancement of archaeometa
Page 87 and 88: Similarly, there are cultural conne
Page 89 and 90: Another benefit of experimental arc
Page 91 and 92: -----. 1984. “Metal Objects from
Page 93 and 94: Lloyd, Seton, Howard Frederick, and
Page 95 and 96: Reade, J. 2001. “Assyrian King-Li
Page 97 and 98: Yalçın, Ü. 2010. “ Alacahöyü
Page 104 and 105: Fig. 1 APPENDIX C FIGURES 96
Page 106 and 107: . Fig. 22 Fig. 26 Fig. 18 Fig. 19 F
Page 108 and 109: 11. Stronach 1957:93, fig. 2/7. 12.
Page 110 and 111: Type IId Type II b Cat. No: 4 Cat.
Page 112 and 113: Type I f1 Type I F2 Cat. No: 7 Fune
Page 114 and 115: Çadır Höyük Type I c Cat. No: 1
Page 116 and 117: Type I c Type IV a1 Type IVb Cat. N
Page 118 and 119: Type II a1 Cat. No: 24 Kalınkaya n
Page 120 and 121: POLATLI: Ankara province. Type II c
Page 122 and 123: YAZILIKAYA: Afyon province. Type I
Page 126 and 127: Type I c2 Type ? Type III a Cat. No
Page 128: Type I a Cat. No: 47 Sadberk Hanım
show all

EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL ... - Bilkent University

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?