EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL ... - Bilkent University
EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL ... - Bilkent University
EARLY BRONZE AGE DAGGERS IN CENTRAL ... - Bilkent University
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
6.1 Pontic Interactions<br />
When the geographical limits of the region were outlined in the introduction<br />
chapter, however, the Central Black Sea region, north of Çorum district, was not<br />
included. Two important sites in the Central Black Sea region are very important for<br />
the cultural realm of Central Anatolia. İkiztepe and Dündartepe are so indispensable;<br />
they cannot be left out of any discussion concerning the EBA Central Anatolia,<br />
especially metallurgical realm. Both of these settlements show strong Central<br />
Anatolian cultural connections based on the pottery as well as metal forms. The Bafra<br />
plains importance (including Samsun) as a settlement site is the existence of the Halys<br />
River valley which served as a communication route between the Central Anatolia and<br />
the Black Sea region. The importance of this route is evident in the discussion of the<br />
dagger typologies. No one makes it clearer than Stronach when he states: “[the] oldest<br />
stratified type I dagger in Central Anatolia comes from Alişar. Similar ones also come<br />
from Dündartepe and Tekeköy” (Stronach, 1957: 90).<br />
In the following discussion, it will be clear that the Central Anatolian dagger<br />
typologies reflects the interactions between the local sites as well as the far reaching<br />
trade network of Central Anatolia from Troy to Mesopotamia.<br />
As it was stated, the organization of the dagger typologies into six main types<br />
did not indicate a certain developmental sequence or chronological framework. For<br />
example, Type IIIe dagger is not less developed nor placed in an earlier chronological<br />
frame than Type IVb dagger. The reason behind this approach is made clear by<br />
Maxwell-Hyslop when she stated that “…typological development must not be<br />
57