Lincoln University Digital Dissertation - Lincoln University Research ...
Lincoln University Digital Dissertation - Lincoln University Research ...
Lincoln University Digital Dissertation - Lincoln University Research ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
While tangible outcomes such as money as well as health and nutrition were<br />
also identified as important considerations associated with taewa production,<br />
it was the intangible outcomes that were of primary importance. Reasons for<br />
this include the prioritisation of traditional Maori values and ethics; however it<br />
also reflects the influence of associated external incomes. All growers had<br />
additional, external means for financial security which invariably contributed<br />
towards their ability to prioritise intangible assets associated with taewa<br />
production and is an important consideration.<br />
The significance of non-tangible outcomes within Maori society is supported<br />
by Lambert (2007) who comments that while Maori seek access to<br />
commercial markets they, “simultaneously participate in a broader cultural<br />
economy in which cultural concerns and practices to Maori may change, but<br />
are not sacrificed as they have historically defined Maori resilience” (Lambert,<br />
2007: 8). Therefore the SLA is supported, highlighting a range of outcomes<br />
which can be realised through taewa production for the growers concerned.<br />
5.4 Social and Cultural capital<br />
As described in Chapter 2, indigenous initiatives which draw on residual<br />
stocks of social/cultural capital for their impetus, provide useful insights into<br />
problems conceiving and operationalising ‘sustainable development’ (Loomis,<br />
2000). Putman (1994) further describes that “a region’s chances of achieving<br />
socioeconomic development [depend] less on its socioeconomic endowments<br />
than on its civic endowments” (Putman, 1994: 157). Therefore, social/cultural<br />
assets are a central consideration for this research.<br />
Enhancing and sustaining cultural assets enhances capabilities (human<br />
assets), ensures the relationships of people with their environment (natural<br />
assets) are sustained, gives people a sense of identity, self esteem and<br />
dignity, and enhances social assets and the relationships and trust between<br />
people (Bebbington, 1999; Overton et al, 1999). However, despite a number<br />
of authors noting that sustainable livelihoods analyses need to take more<br />
account of gender, age, ethnicity and class (Bebbington, 1999; Ellis, 2000) or<br />
63