27.10.2013 Views

Vaporization of JP-8 Jet Fuel in a Simulated Aircraft Fuel Tank ...

Vaporization of JP-8 Jet Fuel in a Simulated Aircraft Fuel Tank ...

Vaporization of JP-8 Jet Fuel in a Simulated Aircraft Fuel Tank ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Pressure, psia<br />

16<br />

14<br />

12<br />

10<br />

8<br />

6<br />

4<br />

2<br />

0<br />

P=14.56913<br />

P= -0.00523t+32.834<br />

P=4.896<br />

0 2000 4000 6000 8000 10000 12000 14000<br />

Time, seconds<br />

P=14.579<br />

P=0.005t-44.366<br />

Measured Pressure<br />

Adjusted Pressure<br />

Figure 5.0. Measured and adjusted pressure pr<strong>of</strong>iles for a 10,000’ altitude flight pr<strong>of</strong>ile test.<br />

5.1 Validation Tests<br />

5.1.1 <strong>Tank</strong> Mix<strong>in</strong>g<br />

Results with a dry tank test at 30,000’ altitude (4.6 psia) are displayed <strong>in</strong> figure 5.1,<br />

show<strong>in</strong>g the lower tank surface temperature and the measured ullage temperatures from<br />

the three thermocouples located at different positions <strong>in</strong> the ullage. Similar results are<br />

shown <strong>in</strong> figure 5.2 for a tank at sea level ambient pressure conta<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g liquid fuel at a<br />

load<strong>in</strong>g <strong>of</strong> 31.5 kg/m 3 . The results <strong>in</strong> figures 5.1 and 5.2 are typical <strong>of</strong> all <strong>of</strong> the data and<br />

show that all three ullage thermocouples measured about the same value or with<strong>in</strong> the<br />

measurement error <strong>of</strong> ±1°F. This confirmed that the bulk ullage gas <strong>in</strong> the test tank was<br />

well mixed due to the turbulent natural convection with<strong>in</strong> the tank.<br />

Figures 5.3 and 5.4 show a comparison <strong>of</strong> the mean measured ullage temperature<br />

(average <strong>of</strong> the three ullage thermocouple measurements) with the ullage temperature<br />

predicted by the model <strong>in</strong> ref [11]. The good agreement, with<strong>in</strong> approximately 2%,<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!