27.12.2013 Views

Philip Y. Kao PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Y. Kao PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

Philip Y. Kao PhD thesis - Research@StAndrews:FullText

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

one’s immediate environment, freeing the culturally-inflected and ageing soul for<br />

ontological respite and relief.<br />

The third point is what to make of the relation between professional (formal) caregivers<br />

and care receivers. Conventional wisdom suggests that family caregivers are somehow<br />

better caregivers, because they know and love their elders. Yet, there is the also idea that<br />

sometimes, family members are too emotional and close to their loved ones, making it<br />

hard for them to provide objective and effective care. What is the right distance then,<br />

and what does this say about the kind of intimacy and empathetic/emotive space being<br />

carved out by new forms of caregiving relations. This <strong>thesis</strong> has gestured toward<br />

exploring this aspect for further research. How people ground these emerging relations,<br />

especially in late life, is ontologically interesting. New subjectivities and commitments<br />

will continue to evolve no doubt.<br />

Lastly, the residents at Tacoma Pastures are not victims in the jerk sense that somehow<br />

the long-term facility has injured or taken away their personhood. Neither are they<br />

victims in the sense that society has offered them up for sacrifice in some kind of ritual<br />

arrangement. Rather, they are victims because they have been duped into thinking that<br />

life can and should be arranged and sorted, especially in old age. Many questions remain<br />

unanswered, and some have yet to be formulated. One question that I have not yet<br />

adequately answered is whether or not we can say that there is such a thing as a ‘bad<br />

caregiver’. In the face of human vulnerability, and given the fact that much of formal<br />

caregiving, at least in the context of American long-term care facilities, is reflexive across<br />

social and generational boundaries, and evokes certain ontological and relational<br />

commitments through empathy and vicarship, the probability of an amoral and<br />

indifferent caregiver seems unlikely. Caregivers are more than just manual labourers;<br />

they may also be moral agents of change. Their work cannot be viewed without this<br />

moral and emotional context. It is perhaps a mark of our evolutionary history that the<br />

longer we live, the more social and interconnected we find ourselves, and that money<br />

isn't really everything—even in the business of ageing.<br />

198

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!