29.12.2013 Views

View/Open - Dalhousie University

View/Open - Dalhousie University

View/Open - Dalhousie University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

question. While participants from one program spoke of the importance of their<br />

program-wide empowerment approach, no participants specifically named social<br />

change efforts as an example of their program’s work.<br />

The data collection process, and the interviews in particular, did make room for<br />

what Stake calls “late-emerging issues” (Stake, 2005, p. 453). Limiting the analysis and<br />

discussion to a predetermined outline of themes runs counter to the desire to hear<br />

what participants have to say; rather, one interview should inform the next. Thus, the<br />

structure, process, and tone of the interviews encouraged the naming and exploration<br />

of relevant new issues, right up until the end of the data collection.<br />

5.10 DATA ANALYSIS<br />

Through this study, I aimed to develop a rich description of these programs,<br />

which would give voice to their existence, and provide insight into their dynamics,<br />

strengths, and challenges. Drawing from my own professional experience and<br />

theoretical perspective, and my review of the literature, I began the study with some<br />

ideas and questions about home visiting programs. I collected data based in part on<br />

these ideas and questions, and also on the issues raised by participants during the<br />

interviews. Data analysis commenced with the collection of the first pieces of data; that<br />

is, ideas and issues were identified throughout the data collection process, allowing for<br />

additional relevant issues to be included in subsequent interviews. This was followed by<br />

thematic analysis of the data, outlined below.<br />

Once the interviews and review of agency documents began, I compiled<br />

reflective memos, paying attention to my own role as researcher and my influence on<br />

the project and on participants, as well as my feelings, reactions, and new ideas that<br />

were brought out through the data collection process. As noted on page 84, I sent each<br />

transcript and any related interpretive notes to each participant for feedback on the<br />

accuracy of the transcription and interpretation. I then made follow-up contacts, via<br />

88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!