29.12.2013 Views

View/Open - Dalhousie University

View/Open - Dalhousie University

View/Open - Dalhousie University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

(Atkinson, 2008). As well, the lack of family-positive public policies affects women more<br />

dramatically than men (Kershaw, 2009; UNICEF, 2008); indeed, the lack of child care in<br />

Canada and the U.S. has allowed the gender equality rankings of both countries to slip<br />

(UNICEF, 2008). Meanwhile, in Ireland, the lack of child care has relegated the majority<br />

of mothers of young children to low-paid, part-time employment with limited benefits<br />

and job protections (OECD, 2006). The lack of child care subsidies has disadvantaged<br />

Irish women further, as “on average, Irish parents pay more than 50% of the costs of<br />

child care. Without subsidisation or the capping of fees charged by providers, many<br />

women in low and moderate income jobs are unable to access child care of an<br />

acceptable level of quality” (OECD, 2006, p. 28). Thus, institutionalized sexism and<br />

misogyny continue to deny many women and children in these countries opportunities,<br />

rights, and quality of life.<br />

Societal beliefs and social structures merge in powerful ways, as illustrated by<br />

one deeply ingrained cornerstone of wealthy Anglo-Saxon countries: the concept of a<br />

public-private split, with early child development and family matters being classified as<br />

part of the private realm (Neysmith, 1998; Rossiter, 1988). This theme contributes to<br />

the exclusion of mothers from employment and schooling, and helps keep discussions of<br />

healthy child development and a national child care strategy relegated to the sidelines.<br />

Neysmith (1998) argues that issues of care-giving in general have been sidelined within<br />

the public policy arena in part because of sexism, and in part because of this publicprivate<br />

split: as long as something is a private matter, it does not belong in the<br />

discussion on public policy. Not surprisingly, the ability to embrace “private”<br />

responsibilities as public issues has been key to success in the development of public<br />

policy in Sweden (Bremberg, 2009) and other countries – where accordingly, the gender<br />

gap has narrowed (OECD, 2006; UNICEF, 2008).<br />

25

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!