29.12.2013 Views

View/Open - Dalhousie University

View/Open - Dalhousie University

View/Open - Dalhousie University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

study participants and in program documents) included empowerment approach,<br />

community development model, strengths-based, the Connect approach, asset-based,<br />

and parents as experts. This was true even for Good Beginnings, where many families<br />

were referred specifically due to an identified need for parenting education; one Good<br />

Beginnings volunteer related that each family was like a “boat in a storm in the middle<br />

of the sea, and we are like a ship. We come alongside and support them and help them,<br />

but we don't tell them what to do.” By and large, study participants also described<br />

many of the difficulties facing families as being externally rooted in the difficult social<br />

and economic structures of the larger community. One manager illustrated this<br />

poignantly. Reflecting on the high incidence of post-partum depression in the local<br />

area, she asked, with a tone of frustration and disbelief: “What have we done in our<br />

society, that women are so disconnected?” Many of the perspectives embraced by<br />

these programs are rooted in the feminist ideas that each woman is the expert on her<br />

own life, and that powerful, often oppressive, social and economic forces shape<br />

women’s lives.<br />

As outlined in Section 3.5.2, these perspectives are quite different from the more<br />

individual and deficit-oriented stances officially adopted by many home visiting<br />

programs in the second half of the twentieth century, particularly targeted programs<br />

with paid visitors. These programs often focused primarily on child-related outcomes<br />

(see page 35 for details), and lacked a critical analysis of the social determinants of wellbeing<br />

and the difficult positions of overburdened parents – most commonly, mothers,<br />

and particularly, low-income single mothers. As a result, implicitly or explicitly, some<br />

programs seemed to ignore mothers’ needs and/or blame mothers for their own and<br />

their children’s difficulties. As noted earlier, this stance can both mask the socially<br />

rooted difficulties faced by families, and impair the formation of an empowering and<br />

supportive therapeutic alliance between mothers and home visitors. The three<br />

programs in this study have shown that it is possible to work for children’s well-being by<br />

explicitly supporting mothers, as women and as parents; by following mothers’ lead on<br />

231

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!