29.12.2013 Views

View/Open - Dalhousie University

View/Open - Dalhousie University

View/Open - Dalhousie University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

However, given the funding challenges facing these and other mixed-delivery programs,<br />

particularly funding for the in-home work of paid staff members, a lack of awareness of<br />

the nature, extent and impact of staff members’ direct work with families is clearly not<br />

in the programs’ best interest.<br />

Staff members’ work should be communicated with both seriousness and a pride<br />

in the ways that this delivery model makes important differences for children and<br />

families. These programs are in an excellent position to educate people regarding the<br />

multifaceted effectiveness of providing ‘higher-needs’ families with longer-term service<br />

that is supportive, responsive, and highly skilled. Everyone – volunteers, stakeholders &<br />

partners, potential funders, the public – needs to know exactly what these staff<br />

members do, why their work is effective, and how valuable it is.<br />

2. As feasible, programs should seek out ongoing communication and/or<br />

collaboration with other home visiting programs, and in particular, other<br />

mixed-delivery home visiting programs.<br />

One of my own reflections regarding this study relates to the benefits I have<br />

received from learning about other programs. To the extent that distance and busy<br />

schedules will allow, program staff should be supported in efforts to be in contact with<br />

other programs. As a starting point, with the permission of the manager of each<br />

program, I will be forwarding a contact list to all mixed-delivery programs.<br />

3. As necessary, programs should enhance program evaluation and data<br />

collection.<br />

Home visiting programs should review their current ongoing data collection and<br />

evaluation methods vis-à-vis tracking the impact of the program on families, volunteers,<br />

and the broader community. If these are found to be lacking, it is recommended that<br />

programs make it a priority to improve these mechanisms. Once effective systems are<br />

in place, relevant data can be collected on an on-going basis, and can provide key<br />

contributions to program planning, development, and evaluation. As this will require<br />

additional resources, funders are urged to support such efforts.<br />

218

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!