Untitled - California State University, Long Beach
Untitled - California State University, Long Beach
Untitled - California State University, Long Beach
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
unknown,” the speaker reminds the readers “We say amiss / This or that<br />
is, / Thy word is all, if we could spell” (14, 19-21). This evokes an image<br />
of Christians corporately studying the Bible and engaging in debate over<br />
theology. Yet, the speaker asserts that in concentrating on Scripture, the<br />
Christians should “spell” (21). Here, spell likely means to “To engage in<br />
study or contemplation of something” (OED). Thus, the speaker paints<br />
a picture of corporate meditation assisting the readers in the stage of<br />
purgation or “killing and quick’ning” (16). The end goal being corporate<br />
sight, since God’s wonders are: “To make us see, we are but flowers that<br />
glide. / Which when we once can find and prove, / Thou hast a garden<br />
for us where to bide” (44-6). The metaphor of the dying and resurrecting<br />
flower is to be considered by the Christians so that they all gain access to<br />
a corporate place of unity abiding in Christ as flowers in a garden.<br />
Furthermore, while “Aaron” and “Love III” chronicle the individual<br />
believer’s interacting with God, the eventual goal of this individual’s<br />
meditation or “tuning” into God is corporate worship. In “Aaron,”<br />
after the speaker gets his “doctrine tuned by Christ,” he announces<br />
“Come people; Aaron’s dressed” (23, 25). Using the figure of Aaron<br />
allows Herbert to connect the speaker to a priest figure. Presumably,<br />
the speaker is a minister whose goal in individual sanctification and<br />
internal preparation is to engage with others leading corporate worship.<br />
Appropriately, the poem ends with this very occurrence as the speaker<br />
calls out for others to join him. In “Love III,” the speaker dialogues back<br />
and forth with God, or Love, about the act of glazing or meditation<br />
on Christ. At first the speaker is hesitant since in his sinful “unkind,<br />
ungrateful” state he cannot view Love (9-10). Yet, Love assures him by<br />
means of a rhetorical question that Love, or more specifically Christ,<br />
“bore the blame” (15). Then, Love directs the speaker to “‘sit down . . .<br />
and taste my meat’” (17). With this ending image of the speaker sitting<br />
before Christ partaking in the Eucharist, Herbert again alludes to a<br />
128 | Keery<br />
corporate act of worship. Theologically speaking, the Eucharist is to be<br />
an act of Christian communion both with Christ and other Christians;<br />
thus, this act is intimately linked with the Anglo-Catholic liturgy and<br />
in Calvinist Protestant circles made up one of the only ritualistic parts<br />
of their church service. Ultimately, taking the Eucharist is a communal<br />
meditation on Christ’s crucifixion. Thus, even when Herbert describes<br />
individual, private meditation, he often links it to communal worship.<br />
Thus, reading Donne and Herbert unbound from a specific faction<br />
of the Church of England allows for an uncovering of their individual<br />
visions of faith. Examining their use of verbal icons and combining this<br />
idea with the act of Ignatian meditation opens the way for a provocative<br />
reading of Donne’s and Herbert’s poetry. How Donne and Herbert<br />
navigate the theological complexities of using iconic imagery showcases<br />
differing views of the purpose of meditation—specifically, if it should<br />
be primarily an individual or corporate event. More importantly, this<br />
emphasis reveals Donne’s spiritual anxiety and vision of a faith defined<br />
by the individual seeking the gaze of God, and Herbert’s use of corporate<br />
meditation and vision of faith where, in community, the Christian must<br />
gaze at God. These differing models of faith call for more examination<br />
in other poems by Donne and Herbert as well as consideration of how<br />
these visions would influence their views of personal identity. Certainly<br />
these ideas would also be informed by Donne’s vision of the individual<br />
in “Everlasting night” and Herbert’s vision of communities drawn to<br />
“Immortal Heat.”<br />
Keery | 129