30.12.2013 Views

Untitled - California State University, Long Beach

Untitled - California State University, Long Beach

Untitled - California State University, Long Beach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

unknown,” the speaker reminds the readers “We say amiss / This or that<br />

is, / Thy word is all, if we could spell” (14, 19-21). This evokes an image<br />

of Christians corporately studying the Bible and engaging in debate over<br />

theology. Yet, the speaker asserts that in concentrating on Scripture, the<br />

Christians should “spell” (21). Here, spell likely means to “To engage in<br />

study or contemplation of something” (OED). Thus, the speaker paints<br />

a picture of corporate meditation assisting the readers in the stage of<br />

purgation or “killing and quick’ning” (16). The end goal being corporate<br />

sight, since God’s wonders are: “To make us see, we are but flowers that<br />

glide. / Which when we once can find and prove, / Thou hast a garden<br />

for us where to bide” (44-6). The metaphor of the dying and resurrecting<br />

flower is to be considered by the Christians so that they all gain access to<br />

a corporate place of unity abiding in Christ as flowers in a garden.<br />

Furthermore, while “Aaron” and “Love III” chronicle the individual<br />

believer’s interacting with God, the eventual goal of this individual’s<br />

meditation or “tuning” into God is corporate worship. In “Aaron,”<br />

after the speaker gets his “doctrine tuned by Christ,” he announces<br />

“Come people; Aaron’s dressed” (23, 25). Using the figure of Aaron<br />

allows Herbert to connect the speaker to a priest figure. Presumably,<br />

the speaker is a minister whose goal in individual sanctification and<br />

internal preparation is to engage with others leading corporate worship.<br />

Appropriately, the poem ends with this very occurrence as the speaker<br />

calls out for others to join him. In “Love III,” the speaker dialogues back<br />

and forth with God, or Love, about the act of glazing or meditation<br />

on Christ. At first the speaker is hesitant since in his sinful “unkind,<br />

ungrateful” state he cannot view Love (9-10). Yet, Love assures him by<br />

means of a rhetorical question that Love, or more specifically Christ,<br />

“bore the blame” (15). Then, Love directs the speaker to “‘sit down . . .<br />

and taste my meat’” (17). With this ending image of the speaker sitting<br />

before Christ partaking in the Eucharist, Herbert again alludes to a<br />

128 | Keery<br />

corporate act of worship. Theologically speaking, the Eucharist is to be<br />

an act of Christian communion both with Christ and other Christians;<br />

thus, this act is intimately linked with the Anglo-Catholic liturgy and<br />

in Calvinist Protestant circles made up one of the only ritualistic parts<br />

of their church service. Ultimately, taking the Eucharist is a communal<br />

meditation on Christ’s crucifixion. Thus, even when Herbert describes<br />

individual, private meditation, he often links it to communal worship.<br />

Thus, reading Donne and Herbert unbound from a specific faction<br />

of the Church of England allows for an uncovering of their individual<br />

visions of faith. Examining their use of verbal icons and combining this<br />

idea with the act of Ignatian meditation opens the way for a provocative<br />

reading of Donne’s and Herbert’s poetry. How Donne and Herbert<br />

navigate the theological complexities of using iconic imagery showcases<br />

differing views of the purpose of meditation—specifically, if it should<br />

be primarily an individual or corporate event. More importantly, this<br />

emphasis reveals Donne’s spiritual anxiety and vision of a faith defined<br />

by the individual seeking the gaze of God, and Herbert’s use of corporate<br />

meditation and vision of faith where, in community, the Christian must<br />

gaze at God. These differing models of faith call for more examination<br />

in other poems by Donne and Herbert as well as consideration of how<br />

these visions would influence their views of personal identity. Certainly<br />

these ideas would also be informed by Donne’s vision of the individual<br />

in “Everlasting night” and Herbert’s vision of communities drawn to<br />

“Immortal Heat.”<br />

Keery | 129

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!