30.12.2013 Views

Untitled - California State University, Long Beach

Untitled - California State University, Long Beach

Untitled - California State University, Long Beach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

trumpery” (Milton III. 474-75). Of course, Milton’s narrator is evoking<br />

the sects of priests who are identifiable by the colors of their cloaks. In<br />

a matter of twenty lines, Milton’s narrator condemns three layers of<br />

fragmentation: a new race of beings, the division of languages, and the<br />

factioning of the church—and all of this fragmentation stems from acts<br />

of physical reproduction which are separate from God.<br />

In contrast to these moments of reproduction which are separate<br />

from God, the birth of Eve is initially presented as a unifying moment<br />

that stresses likeness. When viewed through Wittig’s critical lens, Milton<br />

initially depicts Adam and Eve as genderless beings who are gendered on<br />

account of their social relationship to one another, rather than inherently<br />

gendered by God: Adam is both mother and husband to Eve and Eve<br />

initially desires to live in conformity with her mirror images, meaning<br />

both the immaculately productive earth and her personal reflection, rather<br />

than her opposite, Adam. Upon waking after her creation, according to<br />

her own recollection, Eve has no knowledge of gender difference and<br />

desires to remain with her own reflection rather than Adam (Milton<br />

IV. 460-80); she initially finds Adam “less fair, / Less winning soft, less<br />

amiably mild / than that smooth watery image” (Milton IV. 478-80) of<br />

herself in the mirrored pond. Furthermore, Eve is often likened to the<br />

earth, which is highly productive by means of God’s interaction, which<br />

doubly indicates her desire for unity, as she is literally seeing herself<br />

reflected in the earth. Schwartz suggests that Adam’s description of Eve’s<br />

birth “is the summation of all that God, in his goodness, has planned<br />

for his universe” (194). I would further this claim to suggest that God’s<br />

planned universe was initially egalitarian and unified on account of a<br />

lack of gender distinction. As Wittig suggests, without the binary of male<br />

gender, there is no female gender. Eve inherently seeks unification, but<br />

with the acceptance of Adam as her master, she acknowledges difference,<br />

resulting in divisions and leading to her separation from God, as she is<br />

50 | Coleman<br />

reliant on Adam as a mediator.<br />

Adam’s first interaction with Eve, wherein she “yields” to his seizing<br />

(Milton V. 489) hand, initiates difference in Eden, leading to Eve’s<br />

separation from God via Adam’s mediation; thus, Adam becomes the first<br />

divider by means of his relational position to Eve. After Eve leaves her<br />

reflection, God tells her that she is Adam’s “image” (Milton IV.472) and<br />

that he is “inseparably [hers]” (Milton IV. 473). This statement is relevant<br />

for two reasons: it demonstrates Eve’s desire for unity and shows that she<br />

initially has a direct relationship with God. However, upon seeing Adam,<br />

she perceives physical difference and flees, at which Adam speaks to her;<br />

he reasons, “Part of my soul I seek thee and thee claim / my other half”<br />

(Milton IV. 487-88). Adam demonstrates that he sees Eve as something<br />

to be claimed, and by seizing her hand he signifies that he is superior to<br />

her. Riggs suggests that in “the poem’s first human conversation a tension<br />

may be felt, a kindly pressure to misinterpret the reality of a marriage of<br />

peculiarly unequal equals” (368); indeed, Adam’s claiming of Eve, who<br />

is defined as complete in herself, is unsettling and introduces a sense<br />

of gender hierarchy that is discordant within the ideal space of Eden.<br />

Following Adam’s dominant act, Eve responds with her first recognition of<br />

gender difference, admitting that her “beauty is excelled by manly grace”<br />

(Milton IV. 490). In doing so, she exalts Adam above herself, unlike God<br />

who depicted them as equals, leading to gendering, as Eve begins to see<br />

herself only in contrast to Adam, her new master. Of this event, Schwartz<br />

suggests that Eve’s “desire for sameness gives way—at first unstably—to a<br />

desire for sameness in difference, which then leads to motherhood, which<br />

is ambiguously marked by an experience of both desire and submission”<br />

(204), supporting my argument that with difference comes submission,<br />

reproduction, and, I would add, separation from God by reliance on<br />

mediation. By recognizing Adam as her new master, she loses her direct<br />

relationship with God and becomes reliant on Adam’s mediation.<br />

Coleman | 51

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!