30.12.2013 Views

Untitled - California State University, Long Beach

Untitled - California State University, Long Beach

Untitled - California State University, Long Beach

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

himself to the land, which is, as previously established, a feminine force.<br />

But this is complicated, as the feminized earth itself is cursed (Milton X.<br />

202), and Adam is simply forced to engage with a cursed entity, rather<br />

than become a cursed entity himself. With Eve taking over the burden<br />

of productivity, Adam is forced to toil with unproductive soil. Thus,<br />

post-fall, reproduction is gendered as wholly feminine, while lack of<br />

productivity is masculinized.<br />

Thus, in a way, Adam and Eve are equalized in the sense that they are<br />

both subject to their gendered opposite and equally physically separated<br />

from God. Whereas pre-fall Adam had access to God directly and Eve<br />

was mediated by Adam, post-fall both are equally expelled from God’s<br />

presence and mediated only by Christ. In Book X, the son assumes the<br />

role of mediator, as the narrator relates, “from wrath more cool, / came<br />

the mild Judge and Intercessor both / to sentence Man” (Milton X.<br />

95b-97a). Thus, when Adam blames Eve and God for the fall (Milton X.<br />

135-145), it has already been established that Adam has been demoted<br />

as a viable judge of Eve, and thus his power is reduced. The Son rebukes<br />

Adam for “resign[ing] [his] manhood” (Milton X. 148), suggesting that<br />

through the diminishing of his authority, he has become ungendered.<br />

From this point on, Christ acts as the “Intercessor” between God, man<br />

and woman, allowing equal access to God amongst all humankind. Of<br />

course, Wittig would resist this reading, as Adam and Eve’s genders are<br />

still defined by their social interaction, especially since Eve is the domestic<br />

reproducer and Adam is the public laborer. However, while fallen, both<br />

are at least equally fallen and have equally limited access to God, which is<br />

a necessary step to reestablishing the perfect, genderless ideal, as promised<br />

through Christ’s birth.<br />

However, this equality shifts slightly, and temporarily, as through the<br />

promise of Christ’s birth, wherein God directly interacts with a woman<br />

alone, the hope of unity is restored, reestablishing the genderless, uniform<br />

ideal by means of an unmediated woman. As Michael relates, Christ is<br />

56 | Coleman<br />

promised “by the woman’s seed” (Milton XII. 601), through “Mary,<br />

second Eve” (Milton X. 183), allowing a chance for redemption through<br />

all-female reproduction. As previously established, reproduction that<br />

results from God’s direct influence is positive and unifying. Additionally,<br />

Christ’s birth allows for the possibility of a total restoration (XII. 623),<br />

implying a return to an egalitarian state of being; since Christ’s ransom<br />

allows people to go to heaven, a sphere inhabited by genderless spirits, his<br />

restoration reinstates a perfect, genderless space as Eden was intended to<br />

be, but failed on account of man’s mediatory role with woman.<br />

As contemporaries, both Cavendish and Milton wrote at a time<br />

of great dissention, turmoil and fragmentation on account of the Civil<br />

Wars. If adhering to Murphy’s reading that the family is a microcosmic<br />

site of larger social politics, than the fragmentation of the family via<br />

reproduction and gender hierarchies can be read as representative of larger<br />

social concerns about political divisions. Thus, both writers attempt to<br />

recreate a space wherein the possibility for unification becomes a reality;<br />

however, neither can believe this reality without destroying gender, for,<br />

as Wittig astutely notes, with gender comes difference and division. Both<br />

depict physical, gendered reproduction in a negative light, as physical<br />

reproduction is an act that divides men from women, andcreates further<br />

fragmentation through an increase in population. Therefore, in their<br />

respective ways, they create worlds that praise ungendered reproduction<br />

as means to establish unity and equality within society.<br />

Coleman | 57

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!