Annual Report 2010 - Hannover Re
Annual Report 2010 - Hannover Re
Annual Report 2010 - Hannover Re
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Enterprise management<br />
Declaration of the Executive Board regarding the Corporate<br />
Governance of the Company as defined by § 289 a Para. 1<br />
Commercial Code (HGB)<br />
contracts). In its implementation of the version of the Code<br />
dated 26 May <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Hannover</strong> Rückversicherung AG again diverges<br />
from the recommendations in one respect:<br />
Code Item 4.2.3 Para. 4; Caps on severance payments in management<br />
board contracts<br />
German Corporate Governance Code<br />
In the previous year <strong>Hannover</strong> <strong>Re</strong> was not in compliance<br />
with one recommendation of the German Corporate Governance<br />
Code (DCGK); this year, the company’s implementation<br />
of the recommendations of the Code as amended 18 June 2009<br />
and 26 May <strong>2010</strong> again diverges in one respect. In each case<br />
the recommendation in question refers to the inclusion of a<br />
cap on severance payments when concluding or renewing an<br />
Executive Board contract. The reason for this divergence is<br />
set out in the following Declaration of Conformity pursuant<br />
to § 161 Stock Corporation Act (AktG) regarding compliance<br />
with the German Corporate Governance Code. The present<br />
and all previous Declarations of Conformity of the company<br />
are published on its website (http://www.hannover-re.com/<br />
about/corporate/declaration/index.html).<br />
Declaration of Conformity<br />
pursuant to § 161 Stock Corporation Act (AktG) regarding<br />
compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code at<br />
<strong>Hannover</strong> Rückversicherung AG<br />
The German Corporate Governance Code sets out major statutory<br />
requirements governing the management and supervision<br />
of German listed companies. It contains both nationally and<br />
internationally recognised standards of good and responsible<br />
enterprise management. The purpose of the Code is to foster<br />
the trust of investors, clients, employees and the general<br />
public in German corporate governance. Under § 161 Stock<br />
Corporation Act (AktG) it is incumbent on the management<br />
board and supervisory board of German listed companies<br />
to provide an annual declaration of conformity with the recommendations<br />
of the “German Corporate Governance Code<br />
Government Commission” published by the Federal Ministry<br />
of Justice or to explain which recommendations of the Code<br />
were/are not applied.<br />
The Executive Board and Supervisory Board declare pursuant<br />
to § 161 Stock Corporation Act (AktG) that in its implementation<br />
of the German Corporate Governance Code as amended<br />
18 June 2009 <strong>Hannover</strong> Rückversicherung AG diverged in one<br />
respect from the Code recommendations (Code Item 4.2.3<br />
Para. 4; Caps on severance payments in management board<br />
Premature termination of a service contract without serious<br />
cause may only take the form of cancellation by mutual<br />
consent. Even if the Supervisory Board insists upon setting<br />
a severance cap when concluding or renewing an Executive<br />
Board contract, this does not preclude the possibility of negotiations<br />
also extending to the severance cap in the event of<br />
a member leaving the Executive Board. Whilst it is true that<br />
the legal literature discusses structuring options that would<br />
permit the legally secure implementation of the recommendation<br />
contained in Item 4.2.3 Para. 4, it is, however, open to<br />
question whether qualified candidates for a position on the<br />
company’s Executive Board would accept appropriate clauses.<br />
In addition, the scope for negotiation over a member leaving<br />
the Executive Board would be restricted, which could be particularly<br />
disadvantageous in cases where there is ambiguity<br />
surrounding the existence of serious cause for termination. In<br />
the opinion of <strong>Hannover</strong> Rückversicherung AG, it is therefore<br />
in the interest of the company to diverge from the recommendation<br />
contained in Item 4.2.3 Para. 4.<br />
We are in compliance with all other recommendations of the<br />
Code.<br />
<strong>Hannover</strong>, 8 November <strong>2010</strong><br />
Executive Board<br />
Supervisory Board<br />
Statement of enterprise management<br />
practices<br />
<strong>Hannover</strong> <strong>Re</strong>’s objective continues to be the further expansion<br />
of its position as a major, well diversified reinsurer of aboveaverage<br />
profitability with a fast, flexible and undogmatic business<br />
approach. With motivation, power of innovation and the<br />
quality of our services we strive to be one of the three most<br />
profitable reinsurers in the world by boosting our profit and<br />
the value of the company by a double-digit percentage every<br />
year. All other goals, such as profitable growth, the protection<br />
of capital, motivated staff and a lean organisation, are derived<br />
from this overriding objective (http://www.hannover-re.com/<br />
about/strategy/index.html).<br />
80 Management report enterprise management<br />
<strong>Hannover</strong> <strong>Re</strong> Group annual report <strong>2010</strong>