06.01.2014 Views

Annual Report 2010 - Hannover Re

Annual Report 2010 - Hannover Re

Annual Report 2010 - Hannover Re

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Enterprise management<br />

Declaration of the Executive Board regarding the Corporate<br />

Governance of the Company as defined by § 289 a Para. 1<br />

Commercial Code (HGB)<br />

contracts). In its implementation of the version of the Code<br />

dated 26 May <strong>2010</strong> <strong>Hannover</strong> Rückversicherung AG again diverges<br />

from the recommendations in one respect:<br />

Code Item 4.2.3 Para. 4; Caps on severance payments in management<br />

board contracts<br />

German Corporate Governance Code<br />

In the previous year <strong>Hannover</strong> <strong>Re</strong> was not in compliance<br />

with one recommendation of the German Corporate Governance<br />

Code (DCGK); this year, the company’s implementation<br />

of the recommendations of the Code as amended 18 June 2009<br />

and 26 May <strong>2010</strong> again diverges in one respect. In each case<br />

the recommendation in question refers to the inclusion of a<br />

cap on severance payments when concluding or renewing an<br />

Executive Board contract. The reason for this divergence is<br />

set out in the following Declaration of Conformity pursuant<br />

to § 161 Stock Corporation Act (AktG) regarding compliance<br />

with the German Corporate Governance Code. The present<br />

and all previous Declarations of Conformity of the company<br />

are published on its website (http://www.hannover-re.com/<br />

about/corporate/declaration/index.html).<br />

Declaration of Conformity<br />

pursuant to § 161 Stock Corporation Act (AktG) regarding<br />

compliance with the German Corporate Governance Code at<br />

<strong>Hannover</strong> Rückversicherung AG<br />

The German Corporate Governance Code sets out major statutory<br />

requirements governing the management and supervision<br />

of German listed companies. It contains both nationally and<br />

internationally recognised standards of good and responsible<br />

enterprise management. The purpose of the Code is to foster<br />

the trust of investors, clients, employees and the general<br />

public in German corporate governance. Under § 161 Stock<br />

Corporation Act (AktG) it is incumbent on the management<br />

board and supervisory board of German listed companies<br />

to provide an annual declaration of conformity with the recommendations<br />

of the “German Corporate Governance Code<br />

Government Commission” published by the Federal Ministry<br />

of Justice or to explain which recommendations of the Code<br />

were/are not applied.<br />

The Executive Board and Supervisory Board declare pursuant<br />

to § 161 Stock Corporation Act (AktG) that in its implementation<br />

of the German Corporate Governance Code as amended<br />

18 June 2009 <strong>Hannover</strong> Rückversicherung AG diverged in one<br />

respect from the Code recommendations (Code Item 4.2.3<br />

Para. 4; Caps on severance payments in management board<br />

Premature termination of a service contract without serious<br />

cause may only take the form of cancellation by mutual<br />

consent. Even if the Supervisory Board insists upon setting<br />

a severance cap when concluding or renewing an Executive<br />

Board contract, this does not preclude the possibility of negotiations<br />

also extending to the severance cap in the event of<br />

a member leaving the Executive Board. Whilst it is true that<br />

the legal literature discusses structuring options that would<br />

permit the legally secure implementation of the recommendation<br />

contained in Item 4.2.3 Para. 4, it is, however, open to<br />

question whether qualified candidates for a position on the<br />

company’s Executive Board would accept appropriate clauses.<br />

In addition, the scope for negotiation over a member leaving<br />

the Executive Board would be restricted, which could be particularly<br />

disadvantageous in cases where there is ambiguity<br />

surrounding the existence of serious cause for termination. In<br />

the opinion of <strong>Hannover</strong> Rückversicherung AG, it is therefore<br />

in the interest of the company to diverge from the recommendation<br />

contained in Item 4.2.3 Para. 4.<br />

We are in compliance with all other recommendations of the<br />

Code.<br />

<strong>Hannover</strong>, 8 November <strong>2010</strong><br />

Executive Board<br />

Supervisory Board<br />

Statement of enterprise management<br />

practices<br />

<strong>Hannover</strong> <strong>Re</strong>’s objective continues to be the further expansion<br />

of its position as a major, well diversified reinsurer of aboveaverage<br />

profitability with a fast, flexible and undogmatic business<br />

approach. With motivation, power of innovation and the<br />

quality of our services we strive to be one of the three most<br />

profitable reinsurers in the world by boosting our profit and<br />

the value of the company by a double-digit percentage every<br />

year. All other goals, such as profitable growth, the protection<br />

of capital, motivated staff and a lean organisation, are derived<br />

from this overriding objective (http://www.hannover-re.com/<br />

about/strategy/index.html).<br />

80 Management report enterprise management<br />

<strong>Hannover</strong> <strong>Re</strong> Group annual report <strong>2010</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!