22.01.2014 Views

download searchable PDF of Circuit Design book - IEEE Global ...

download searchable PDF of Circuit Design book - IEEE Global ...

download searchable PDF of Circuit Design book - IEEE Global ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Four Important Passband Shapes 313<br />

Table 8.6.<br />

Fano ~injmum Lowpass·Overshoot Droop Values<br />

N 2 3 4 5 6 7 8<br />

L d (dB) 15.40 19.49 27.11 34.76 42.41 50.Q7<br />

MaxL d 9.54 16.99 24.61 32.26 39.91 47.57 55.22<br />

A typical set <strong>of</strong> values for the undercoupled, lossy-source case is shown in<br />

Table 8.5. Note the available arbitrary choices that do not affect the response<br />

shape: not only resistance levels, but also distributions for a given decibel<br />

droop. However, two <strong>of</strong> each set in Table 8.5 simply turn the network end for<br />

end. An undercoupled example for N=4 and a 6=dB droop is worked in<br />

complete detail in Section 8.6.<br />

Fano examined the step response <strong>of</strong> his lowpass filters and recommended<br />

certain decibel droop values versus N for minimum overshoot. Although the<br />

frequency mapping in (6.83) causes some distortion <strong>of</strong> group delay, and the<br />

inverters will cause more, Fano's criterion for good transient response is a<br />

useful guide. His equation for the recommended decibel droop applies for<br />

N>2:<br />

I + (sinh' 0.8814N)<br />

L d = 1010g,o 3.28 dB. (8.86)<br />

Some <strong>of</strong> these values are tabulated in Table 8.6 along with the maximum<br />

possible droop values from (8.80).<br />

8.4.4. Comparison <strong>of</strong>Elliptic Family Responses. The defining response equations<br />

for the overcoupled, maximally flat, and undercoupled response shapes<br />

may be compared to the ideal selectivity asymptote equation, represented in<br />

(8.18), to identify the loaded-Q product (semilogarithmic breakpoint) in each<br />

case. Ignoring the - 6-dB term, the loaded-Q product for overcoupled filters is<br />

20 log IIQ LK = - N2010g F p<br />

+ 2010ge+6(N - I) dB. (8.87)<br />

The loaded-Q product for maximally flat filters is<br />

2010gIIQLK = - N20 log F p<br />

+ 2010ge dB. (8.88)<br />

The loaded-Q product for undercoupled filters is<br />

2010gTIQLK = - N20 log F d +2010gq +6(N-I) -2010g(sinh O.8814N) dB.<br />

(8.89)<br />

Table 8.7 compares the overcoupled and undercoupled cases to the Butterworth<br />

case on the basis <strong>of</strong> (I) relative decibel selectivity for constant<br />

passband width and (2) percentage <strong>of</strong> Butterworth passband width for a fixed<br />

stopband selectivity (L,). It is noted that the defined Fano undercoupled<br />

bandwidth is the decibel droop in Table 8.7. However, an arbitrary basis for<br />

defining the undercoupled bandwidth is available using (8.82).

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!