23.01.2014 Views

32nd Meeting of Academic Council - IGNOU

32nd Meeting of Academic Council - IGNOU

32nd Meeting of Academic Council - IGNOU

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

1) Keeping in view the above it is proposed that the following<br />

remuneration may be considered for approval:<br />

a. VSA-(1-2 Marks) @ Rs.15 per question along with<br />

marking scheme / answers<br />

b. MCQ-(4 choices) @ Rs. 20 per question along with<br />

marking scheme / answers<br />

c. SA-(3-9 Marks) @ Rs. 30 per question along with marking<br />

scheme / value points<br />

d. LA-(10 Marks and above) @ Rs. 50 per question along<br />

with marking scheme / points<br />

2) It is also proposed that the existing norm <strong>of</strong> 50% <strong>of</strong> the amount<br />

fixed for setting <strong>of</strong> question paper/ per question be extended for<br />

translation <strong>of</strong> each <strong>of</strong> the above.<br />

3) In order to encourage internal faculty for question bank<br />

development this is proposed that the faculty members may also<br />

be given payment at the above proposed rates for developing<br />

questions for the question bank for On-Demand Exam.<br />

AC 52.3.2<br />

During the discussion Pr<strong>of</strong>. M. Aslam, Director, SOCE suggested that the<br />

Registrar, SED who is dealing with the examination <strong>of</strong> the University may<br />

be involved in working out the remuneration structure for questions and<br />

development <strong>of</strong> Question Bank <strong>of</strong> On-demand Examination. Pr<strong>of</strong>. Pandav<br />

Nayak suggested for more number <strong>of</strong> Multiple Choice Question (MCQ)<br />

and NCIDE should conduct seminar for involving the academics and the<br />

experts in development <strong>of</strong> Question Bank. The members insisted that the<br />

university should not deviate from the pattern <strong>of</strong> remuneration being<br />

followed by the SED.<br />

It was decided that a Committee constituting <strong>of</strong> the Registrar, SED; Pr<strong>of</strong>.<br />

Sunita Malthotra, Director, SOS; and representative <strong>of</strong> the F&A Division<br />

may be constituted under the chairmanship <strong>of</strong> concerned PVC/ in the<br />

absence <strong>of</strong> PVC, the VC to review the proposal and make<br />

recommendations on the remuneration for preparing various types <strong>of</strong><br />

questions and for developing Question Bank for On-demand Examination<br />

in respect <strong>of</strong> various Courses/Programmes.<br />

AC 52.3.3<br />

ITEM NO. 4<br />

AC 52.4.1<br />

The <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong> considered and resolved to entrust the work with<br />

the above mentioned committee and authorized the Vice-Chancellor to act<br />

on the basis <strong>of</strong> recommendation <strong>of</strong> the committee.<br />

To consider and approve the minutes <strong>of</strong> the 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the ACSC<br />

held on 24 th February 2010<br />

The 30 th <strong>Meeting</strong> <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Academic</strong> <strong>Council</strong>’s Standing Committee was<br />

held on 24 th February 2010.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!