pdf: 6.426kb - University of South Africa
pdf: 6.426kb - University of South Africa
pdf: 6.426kb - University of South Africa
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
`capture', control and financial exploitation <strong>of</strong> cocaine<br />
(non-state actors are the main perpetrators), legal<br />
cases against corrupt senior <strong>of</strong>ficials abusing their<br />
position <strong>of</strong> power and influence to share in cocaine<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>its are quite common. Even the country's highest<br />
<strong>of</strong>fice, the presidency, has been implicated in the past.<br />
Oil multinationals are also not without blame ± for<br />
example, by allowing the Angolan government to<br />
mortgage its future oil production for short-term highinterest<br />
loans for the above purposes, the former<br />
continue to turn a blind eye to corruption, resource<br />
capture, and a crime against the people <strong>of</strong> Angola.<br />
Chevron's complicity in this regard is evident, as it<br />
accounts for about two-thirds <strong>of</strong> Angola's daily<br />
production <strong>of</strong> 500 000 barrels (Maier 1996:62).<br />
Interestingly, Amnesty International has made a<br />
similar observation with regard to the alleged role <strong>of</strong><br />
oil (MNC, BP) in Colombia. In the absence <strong>of</strong><br />
adequate state protection <strong>of</strong> its recent investment in<br />
a 880 km long oil pipeline to the Caribbean coast, BP<br />
has hired a UK-based mercenary firm, Defence<br />
Systems Limited, to train an e lite mobile army group<br />
in counter-guerrilla tactics to protect this pipeline<br />
against FARC and ELN sabotage. Given the Colombian<br />
army's bad human rights record and its grave<br />
atrocities against civilians, in collaboration with<br />
rightwing paramilitaries, such BP involvement is<br />
unfortunate (Global Witness 1998).<br />
Reference has already been made to UNITA's main<br />
objective in the above regard ± to sell diamonds to<br />
finance its costly war effort. Without diamond sales<br />
(estimated at US$ 3,5 billion (1992±1999), its war<br />
effort would be crippled; it would loose its monopoly<br />
over power and legitimacy in large parts <strong>of</strong> Angola,<br />
and would no longer be able to finance its leadership's<br />
greed (Global Witness 1998). And the civil war<br />
would end. It is therefore evident that UNITA has a<br />
vested interest in seeing that their principal source <strong>of</strong><br />
income (diamonds) is not interfered with. If and when<br />
this happens, the consequence there<strong>of</strong> is escalating<br />
violence. As such, political and economic motives are<br />
increasingly intertwined. Currently, UNITA utilizes a<br />
supply route running through both Uganda and the<br />
DRC (also a failed state case), or Zambia and<br />
Rwanda, with or without the <strong>of</strong>ficial consent <strong>of</strong> the<br />
respective governments, en route to the international<br />
diamond markets <strong>of</strong> Antwerp, London and Tel Aviv.<br />
Weapons are smuggled more or less along the same<br />
routes, with Kigali (Rwanda) allegedly acting as a<br />
rendezvous for the conclusion <strong>of</strong> deals in the above<br />
regard. It could be argued that globalization (easy<br />
access to markets and advanced technological communication),<br />
has also become a friend <strong>of</strong> the<br />
guerrillas. Against this background, it is evident that<br />
constraining the illicit diamond trade curse, thus<br />
increasing opportunities for a political solution to<br />
the war, would be extremely difficult (Mail and<br />
Guardian 1 April 1999; Business Report 16 March<br />
2000:1; Global Witness 1998).<br />
The UN, a key player in recent peace initiatives and<br />
preventive diplomacy in Angola, has taken responsibility<br />
for achieving the above objective by extending<br />
the Security Council embargo on the sale <strong>of</strong> weapons<br />
and oil to UNITA (introduced in 1993) to also include<br />
an embargo against diamond smuggling, effective<br />
from June 1998. Whilst resulting in a significant<br />
decrease in UNITA's diamond sales, the implementation<br />
<strong>of</strong> UNSC Res. 1176 appears token at best. This is<br />
confirmed by the UN-sponsored Fowler Report on<br />
UNITA sanctions busting (<strong>of</strong> 15 March 2000), listing<br />
at least 10 <strong>Africa</strong>n countries assisting UNITA in one<br />
way or another (Time 27 March 2000:41) Today,<br />
UNITA, through its control <strong>of</strong> diamond producing<br />
areas, as well as the lack <strong>of</strong> adequate law enforcing<br />
capacity in neighbouring states, is still able to secure<br />
outlet routes for diamond smuggling, as well as inlet<br />
supply routes for weapons procurement. Particularly<br />
Eastern European countries such as Bulgaria, Ukraine<br />
and Russia are eager to do business with UNITA<br />
leader, Jonas Savimbi. Interestingly, FARC also obtain<br />
weapons from these countries (Pierre 1997). The<br />
Fowler Report implicates these and other countries,<br />
such as Burkina Faso, Togo and Gabon in allegedly<br />
aiding UNITA. Reference is also made to <strong>South</strong><br />
<strong>Africa</strong>n diamond and arms dealers' alleged involvement<br />
in the diamond-for-arms network <strong>of</strong> illicit UNITA<br />
suppliers. With the world's premier market for uncut<br />
diamonds situated in Antwerp, Belgium is obviously a<br />
key player with significant responsibility to enforce UN<br />
sanctions to curb UNITA's illicit diamond trade. The<br />
Fowler Report strongly criticizes the Antwerp High<br />
Council for Diamond trading for lax and inadequate<br />
control measures, such as verification <strong>of</strong> certificates <strong>of</strong><br />
origin. However, this seems almost an impossible task,<br />
as diamonds imported from neighbouring Zambia,<br />
Congo-Brazzaville and the DRC do not require any<br />
verification <strong>of</strong> source. After all, how do you distinguish<br />
between a `politically correct' and `politically flawed'<br />
uncut diamond? Furthermore, corrupt <strong>of</strong>ficials in these<br />
countries are more than eager to share in UNITA's<br />
lucrative trade, selling false certificates <strong>of</strong> origin<br />
(priced at about US$100). There is also little in terms<br />
<strong>of</strong> effective border policing. Another key factor has<br />
been the large number <strong>of</strong> middlemen involved in the<br />
diamond trade and smuggling ± cases have been<br />
reported where Angolan army generals and UNITA use<br />
the same middlemen to secure this lucrative trade on<br />
the open market. It is extremely difficult to accurately<br />
trace the movements and origins <strong>of</strong> uncut diamonds.<br />
Above all, Belgium and, for example, Israel have a<br />
strong demand for Angolan type uncut diamonds,<br />
encouraging trade through a generous system <strong>of</strong> tax<br />
breaks. There is thus an underlying incentive to evade<br />
the terms and spirit <strong>of</strong> Res. 1176 (Global Witness<br />
1998; Time 27 March 2000:41).<br />
ISSN 0256±6060±Unisa Lat. Am. Rep. 16(2) 2000 29