02.02.2014 Views

pdf: 6.426kb - University of South Africa

pdf: 6.426kb - University of South Africa

pdf: 6.426kb - University of South Africa

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

`capture', control and financial exploitation <strong>of</strong> cocaine<br />

(non-state actors are the main perpetrators), legal<br />

cases against corrupt senior <strong>of</strong>ficials abusing their<br />

position <strong>of</strong> power and influence to share in cocaine<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>its are quite common. Even the country's highest<br />

<strong>of</strong>fice, the presidency, has been implicated in the past.<br />

Oil multinationals are also not without blame ± for<br />

example, by allowing the Angolan government to<br />

mortgage its future oil production for short-term highinterest<br />

loans for the above purposes, the former<br />

continue to turn a blind eye to corruption, resource<br />

capture, and a crime against the people <strong>of</strong> Angola.<br />

Chevron's complicity in this regard is evident, as it<br />

accounts for about two-thirds <strong>of</strong> Angola's daily<br />

production <strong>of</strong> 500 000 barrels (Maier 1996:62).<br />

Interestingly, Amnesty International has made a<br />

similar observation with regard to the alleged role <strong>of</strong><br />

oil (MNC, BP) in Colombia. In the absence <strong>of</strong><br />

adequate state protection <strong>of</strong> its recent investment in<br />

a 880 km long oil pipeline to the Caribbean coast, BP<br />

has hired a UK-based mercenary firm, Defence<br />

Systems Limited, to train an e lite mobile army group<br />

in counter-guerrilla tactics to protect this pipeline<br />

against FARC and ELN sabotage. Given the Colombian<br />

army's bad human rights record and its grave<br />

atrocities against civilians, in collaboration with<br />

rightwing paramilitaries, such BP involvement is<br />

unfortunate (Global Witness 1998).<br />

Reference has already been made to UNITA's main<br />

objective in the above regard ± to sell diamonds to<br />

finance its costly war effort. Without diamond sales<br />

(estimated at US$ 3,5 billion (1992±1999), its war<br />

effort would be crippled; it would loose its monopoly<br />

over power and legitimacy in large parts <strong>of</strong> Angola,<br />

and would no longer be able to finance its leadership's<br />

greed (Global Witness 1998). And the civil war<br />

would end. It is therefore evident that UNITA has a<br />

vested interest in seeing that their principal source <strong>of</strong><br />

income (diamonds) is not interfered with. If and when<br />

this happens, the consequence there<strong>of</strong> is escalating<br />

violence. As such, political and economic motives are<br />

increasingly intertwined. Currently, UNITA utilizes a<br />

supply route running through both Uganda and the<br />

DRC (also a failed state case), or Zambia and<br />

Rwanda, with or without the <strong>of</strong>ficial consent <strong>of</strong> the<br />

respective governments, en route to the international<br />

diamond markets <strong>of</strong> Antwerp, London and Tel Aviv.<br />

Weapons are smuggled more or less along the same<br />

routes, with Kigali (Rwanda) allegedly acting as a<br />

rendezvous for the conclusion <strong>of</strong> deals in the above<br />

regard. It could be argued that globalization (easy<br />

access to markets and advanced technological communication),<br />

has also become a friend <strong>of</strong> the<br />

guerrillas. Against this background, it is evident that<br />

constraining the illicit diamond trade curse, thus<br />

increasing opportunities for a political solution to<br />

the war, would be extremely difficult (Mail and<br />

Guardian 1 April 1999; Business Report 16 March<br />

2000:1; Global Witness 1998).<br />

The UN, a key player in recent peace initiatives and<br />

preventive diplomacy in Angola, has taken responsibility<br />

for achieving the above objective by extending<br />

the Security Council embargo on the sale <strong>of</strong> weapons<br />

and oil to UNITA (introduced in 1993) to also include<br />

an embargo against diamond smuggling, effective<br />

from June 1998. Whilst resulting in a significant<br />

decrease in UNITA's diamond sales, the implementation<br />

<strong>of</strong> UNSC Res. 1176 appears token at best. This is<br />

confirmed by the UN-sponsored Fowler Report on<br />

UNITA sanctions busting (<strong>of</strong> 15 March 2000), listing<br />

at least 10 <strong>Africa</strong>n countries assisting UNITA in one<br />

way or another (Time 27 March 2000:41) Today,<br />

UNITA, through its control <strong>of</strong> diamond producing<br />

areas, as well as the lack <strong>of</strong> adequate law enforcing<br />

capacity in neighbouring states, is still able to secure<br />

outlet routes for diamond smuggling, as well as inlet<br />

supply routes for weapons procurement. Particularly<br />

Eastern European countries such as Bulgaria, Ukraine<br />

and Russia are eager to do business with UNITA<br />

leader, Jonas Savimbi. Interestingly, FARC also obtain<br />

weapons from these countries (Pierre 1997). The<br />

Fowler Report implicates these and other countries,<br />

such as Burkina Faso, Togo and Gabon in allegedly<br />

aiding UNITA. Reference is also made to <strong>South</strong><br />

<strong>Africa</strong>n diamond and arms dealers' alleged involvement<br />

in the diamond-for-arms network <strong>of</strong> illicit UNITA<br />

suppliers. With the world's premier market for uncut<br />

diamonds situated in Antwerp, Belgium is obviously a<br />

key player with significant responsibility to enforce UN<br />

sanctions to curb UNITA's illicit diamond trade. The<br />

Fowler Report strongly criticizes the Antwerp High<br />

Council for Diamond trading for lax and inadequate<br />

control measures, such as verification <strong>of</strong> certificates <strong>of</strong><br />

origin. However, this seems almost an impossible task,<br />

as diamonds imported from neighbouring Zambia,<br />

Congo-Brazzaville and the DRC do not require any<br />

verification <strong>of</strong> source. After all, how do you distinguish<br />

between a `politically correct' and `politically flawed'<br />

uncut diamond? Furthermore, corrupt <strong>of</strong>ficials in these<br />

countries are more than eager to share in UNITA's<br />

lucrative trade, selling false certificates <strong>of</strong> origin<br />

(priced at about US$100). There is also little in terms<br />

<strong>of</strong> effective border policing. Another key factor has<br />

been the large number <strong>of</strong> middlemen involved in the<br />

diamond trade and smuggling ± cases have been<br />

reported where Angolan army generals and UNITA use<br />

the same middlemen to secure this lucrative trade on<br />

the open market. It is extremely difficult to accurately<br />

trace the movements and origins <strong>of</strong> uncut diamonds.<br />

Above all, Belgium and, for example, Israel have a<br />

strong demand for Angolan type uncut diamonds,<br />

encouraging trade through a generous system <strong>of</strong> tax<br />

breaks. There is thus an underlying incentive to evade<br />

the terms and spirit <strong>of</strong> Res. 1176 (Global Witness<br />

1998; Time 27 March 2000:41).<br />

ISSN 0256±6060±Unisa Lat. Am. Rep. 16(2) 2000 29

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!