04.02.2014 Views

A prolific painter of portraits before and after the French Revolution ...

A prolific painter of portraits before and after the French Revolution ...

A prolific painter of portraits before and after the French Revolution ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

ch07.qxd 12/2/04 11:59 AM Page 348<br />

348<br />

Chapter 7<br />

explaining<br />

as <strong>the</strong> first step in her semester portfolio project. Following this explaining essay, she<br />

wrote a persuasive essay, arguing against English-only legislation. For this initial<br />

essay, however, she focused on reading key articles about English only, exploring <strong>the</strong><br />

issues in each article, <strong>and</strong> explaining key arguments on both sides. Her goal was not<br />

to argue for one side or <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r, but to explore <strong>the</strong> issues <strong>and</strong> explain <strong>the</strong> arguments<br />

on both sides <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> English-only debate. As you read her essay, see if she explains <strong>the</strong><br />

major arguments for both sides in a clear <strong>and</strong> balanced manner.<br />

TEACHING TIP<br />

Perhaps <strong>the</strong> most exciting<br />

new teaching tool in <strong>the</strong><br />

classroom combines <strong>the</strong><br />

computer screen with <strong>the</strong><br />

overhead projector. Many<br />

schools now have portable<br />

computers that can project<br />

computer screens overhead<br />

so that <strong>the</strong> whole class can<br />

observe one student in <strong>the</strong><br />

actual process <strong>of</strong> revising.<br />

You do not have to be in a<br />

computer lab to use this<br />

technology. You just need<br />

<strong>the</strong> portable equipment<br />

<strong>and</strong> students who are drafting<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir essays on a compatible<br />

program. Ask a<br />

student to sit at <strong>the</strong> computer<br />

<strong>and</strong> actually make<br />

changes in his or her draft<br />

as suggested by <strong>the</strong> class.<br />

Prewriting for Topic Proposal<br />

The English-only issue is a very controversial issue. Some say America should<br />

adopt an <strong>of</strong>ficial language policy. O<strong>the</strong>rs think that this is a very racist idea. I<br />

have been reviewing reports <strong>of</strong> a recent vote on making Puerto Rico a state. Part<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> legislation centered on making <strong>the</strong> people <strong>of</strong> Puerto Rico (which is predominantly<br />

Spanish-speaking) adopt English as <strong>the</strong>ir <strong>of</strong>ficial language. Supporters<br />

<strong>of</strong> this bill claim that it is necessary that <strong>the</strong> Puerto Ricans learn English<br />

to become Americanized. O<strong>the</strong>r people feel this will take away <strong>the</strong>ir language<br />

rights. Some people speculate that <strong>the</strong> English-only movement is a xenophobic<br />

reaction to <strong>the</strong> 1960 immigration amendments.These amendments made<br />

it illegal to restrict citizenship to America based on race. With this new amendment,<br />

<strong>the</strong>re has been an influx in immigrants from diverse places. This influx<br />

<strong>of</strong> people could lead to xenophobia (fear <strong>of</strong> strangers or foreigners). I feel this<br />

speculation may be true. In 1912, when New Mexico became a state, it was allowed<br />

to keep Spanish as its <strong>of</strong>ficial language provided that English was also<br />

an <strong>of</strong>ficial language. Why such a radical change in policy when Puerto Rico applies<br />

to be a state? Is America afraid that it will lose its identity to non-<br />

English-speaking people? America started out as a conglomerate <strong>of</strong> immigrants<br />

who did not all speak <strong>the</strong> same language. What now?<br />

I would like to explore this topic more. The two main positions on<br />

English-only legislation are as follows:<br />

1. English needs to be <strong>the</strong> <strong>of</strong>ficial language <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> United States because<br />

we need one unifying language. Without English-only laws,<br />

immigrants will not learn English <strong>and</strong> will not contribute to society.<br />

2. It is unfair to expect current citizens in <strong>the</strong> United States to learn English.<br />

Making English <strong>of</strong>ficial will make people not learn o<strong>the</strong>r languages.<br />

I know some about this subject, but I haven’t done much research on<br />

my own. The questions I have are whe<strong>the</strong>r I could tie this into racism <strong>and</strong><br />

whe<strong>the</strong>r I will be able to get enough information in <strong>the</strong> library <strong>and</strong> on <strong>the</strong><br />

Internet.<br />

PROFESSIONAL COPY—NOT FOR RESALE

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!