BDS market development guide.pdf - PACA
BDS market development guide.pdf - PACA
BDS market development guide.pdf - PACA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
63<br />
• How well?—the quality dimension to performance: indicators should offer insight into<br />
the quality of the change they have helped to bring about.<br />
• Is it feasible to measure? there really is a difference between what we would like to learn<br />
and what can be learned: indicators need to be set that can be measured given the<br />
practical limitations of resources and expertise available.<br />
• Are there “intermediate indicators”?- a plausible pathway to the bottom line: indicators<br />
should reflect changes closer to the point of consumption of <strong>BDS</strong> and not rely only on<br />
bottom-line changes in SME performance that may be influenced by many other factors.<br />
• Precise?—”tightness” in definition: without real specificity in the definition of indicators,<br />
interventions lack focus.<br />
• Is it business-like?—the overarching need to “think business”: indicators need to reflect<br />
SMEs and providers own priorities and business realities. Anything else undermines the<br />
general business-like message of <strong>BDS</strong>.<br />
Big Problems that Don’t Go Away<br />
The world of small businesses that <strong>BDS</strong> interventions seek to improve in some way is<br />
inherently complicated. SMEs do not exist by themselves; they compete in <strong>market</strong>s against<br />
other businesses, have relationships with a range of suppliers, are influenced by government<br />
actions, and are subject to the whims of <strong>market</strong> trends. Their world is complex. Indeed, often<br />
in small informal businesses where the distinction between business and household is<br />
blurred, this complexity is greater than in the formal sector.<br />
This complexity poses great challenges for monitoring and evaluation. A question illustrates<br />
this point: if an SME has changed positively apparently as a result of a project, how do we<br />
know that?<br />
• This change would not have happened without us; all the other myriad influences on a<br />
business have not caused change, rather than our project alone; and<br />
• This change is not at the expense of another SME nearby; it does not merely displace<br />
economic activity from one place to another without any real net addition.<br />
These issues of attribution are always relevant in business <strong>development</strong> situations, and<br />
(regrettably) there is no magical fix to call on to address them 42 .<br />
42 See Oldsman, E; "Evaluation as an effective management toool"; Paper presented to conference on "Business<br />
services for small enterprises in Asia: developing <strong>market</strong>s and measuring performance"; Hanoi, 3 rd -6 th April,<br />
2000 for a more detailed analysis of fundamental challenges inherent in rigorous approaches to evaluation.<br />
Chapter Five—How do We Assess Our Performance?—<br />
Monitoring and Evaluation <strong>BDS</strong> Interventions