05.02.2014 Views

BDS market development guide.pdf - PACA

BDS market development guide.pdf - PACA

BDS market development guide.pdf - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

63<br />

• How well?—the quality dimension to performance: indicators should offer insight into<br />

the quality of the change they have helped to bring about.<br />

• Is it feasible to measure? there really is a difference between what we would like to learn<br />

and what can be learned: indicators need to be set that can be measured given the<br />

practical limitations of resources and expertise available.<br />

• Are there “intermediate indicators”?- a plausible pathway to the bottom line: indicators<br />

should reflect changes closer to the point of consumption of <strong>BDS</strong> and not rely only on<br />

bottom-line changes in SME performance that may be influenced by many other factors.<br />

• Precise?—”tightness” in definition: without real specificity in the definition of indicators,<br />

interventions lack focus.<br />

• Is it business-like?—the overarching need to “think business”: indicators need to reflect<br />

SMEs and providers own priorities and business realities. Anything else undermines the<br />

general business-like message of <strong>BDS</strong>.<br />

Big Problems that Don’t Go Away<br />

The world of small businesses that <strong>BDS</strong> interventions seek to improve in some way is<br />

inherently complicated. SMEs do not exist by themselves; they compete in <strong>market</strong>s against<br />

other businesses, have relationships with a range of suppliers, are influenced by government<br />

actions, and are subject to the whims of <strong>market</strong> trends. Their world is complex. Indeed, often<br />

in small informal businesses where the distinction between business and household is<br />

blurred, this complexity is greater than in the formal sector.<br />

This complexity poses great challenges for monitoring and evaluation. A question illustrates<br />

this point: if an SME has changed positively apparently as a result of a project, how do we<br />

know that?<br />

• This change would not have happened without us; all the other myriad influences on a<br />

business have not caused change, rather than our project alone; and<br />

• This change is not at the expense of another SME nearby; it does not merely displace<br />

economic activity from one place to another without any real net addition.<br />

These issues of attribution are always relevant in business <strong>development</strong> situations, and<br />

(regrettably) there is no magical fix to call on to address them 42 .<br />

42 See Oldsman, E; "Evaluation as an effective management toool"; Paper presented to conference on "Business<br />

services for small enterprises in Asia: developing <strong>market</strong>s and measuring performance"; Hanoi, 3 rd -6 th April,<br />

2000 for a more detailed analysis of fundamental challenges inherent in rigorous approaches to evaluation.<br />

Chapter Five—How do We Assess Our Performance?—<br />

Monitoring and Evaluation <strong>BDS</strong> Interventions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!