05.02.2014 Views

BDS market development guide.pdf - PACA

BDS market development guide.pdf - PACA

BDS market development guide.pdf - PACA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

67<br />

Beyond SMEs—Unchanged Indicators<br />

The emergence of the <strong>market</strong> <strong>development</strong> approach to <strong>BDS</strong> does not affect the ultimate<br />

objectives of interventions or the indicators applied to them. 44 However, in practice, because<br />

of the difficulty of measuring these, greater acceptance of proxy indicators may be necessary.<br />

For example, growing usage of <strong>BDS</strong> by SMEs owned by priority groups (such as women—<br />

characteristically relatively poor) may be used as proxy indicator for poverty reduction.<br />

Market-based monitoring and evaluation means greater use and acceptance of proxy<br />

indicators. Underpinning the entire approach to performance measurement in <strong>BDS</strong> is a<br />

practical recognition that greater reliance on proxy indicators is inevitable, necessary, and to<br />

be welcomed. Proxies are, of course, not new in <strong>development</strong>—they are an inherent part of<br />

the flow of cause and effect that interventions seek to initiate. 45 However, here we place<br />

proxy <strong>market</strong>-based indicators at the forefront of monitoring and evaluation because:<br />

• The analysis at the heart of <strong>BDS</strong> <strong>market</strong> <strong>development</strong> is explicit—better-functioning<br />

<strong>market</strong>s are good for business and ultimately good for the poor; and<br />

• There is growing acceptance that either (1) we can’t or (2) it’s too expensive to know<br />

directly the final impact of interventions on business and on people.<br />

For many in <strong>development</strong> agencies, this assertion may be difficult to accept. But anything<br />

else is less than realistic.<br />

WHAT’S NEW IN MONITORING AND EVALUATION: HOW WE MEASURE<br />

Differences in approaches to measurement follow on from the different emphasis in<br />

indicators, as shown in Figure 16. Some of factors should be noted.<br />

Market-Level—The Same Tools in Evaluation as in Design<br />

A <strong>market</strong> focus requires that we use the same kind of tools—UAI, FGDs, etc.—throughout<br />

the cycle of an intervention (see Chapter Two).<br />

Providers—Using Standard Business-Analysis Tools<br />

Assessing the performance in-depth of providers—as commercial players in a <strong>market</strong>place—requires<br />

use of the kind of approaches used in “normal” business (outside the<br />

44<br />

Development agencies increasingly agree on what these are through the DAC.<br />

45<br />

This causal flow is, of course, the logic at the heart of key planning tools such as the logframe.<br />

Chapter Five—How do We Assess Our Performance?—<br />

Monitoring and Evaluation <strong>BDS</strong> Interventions

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!