Strona 2_redak - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana DobrzaÅskiego ...
Strona 2_redak - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana DobrzaÅskiego ...
Strona 2_redak - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana DobrzaÅskiego ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
35<br />
The micropolar elasto-plastic constitutive model of a granular material with<br />
isotropic hardening and softening differs from the classical theory of plasticity by<br />
the presence of rotations, couple stresses, and a characteristic length corresponding to<br />
the mean grain diameter. Due to the introduction of rotations into the kinematics, each<br />
material point in the 3D case has three translational and three rotational degrees of<br />
freedom, while in 2D and in axis-symmetrical cases two translational and one<br />
rotational degree of freedom. The gradient components of the rotation cause<br />
curvatures that are associated with the couple stresses. This makes the stress and<br />
strain tensors non-symmetric, and the constitutive equation contains the characteristic<br />
length. The micropolar elasto-plastic model in Mühlhaus’s approach [119] was<br />
formed by the extension of the non-associated elasto-plastic flow rule of Drucker-<br />
Prager with isotropic hardening and softening by the Cosserats’ rotations, curvatures,<br />
couple stresses, and mean grain diameter. As a result, the micropolar model includes<br />
the characteristic length and at the same t<strong>im</strong>e retains the essence of the continuous<br />
medium. The constitutive model of granular materials formulated by Mühlhaus<br />
contains a number of constants and of material functions that have to be determined<br />
exper<strong>im</strong>entally. These include the modulus of elasticity, Poisson constant, cohesion,<br />
dependence of internal friction angle on plastic strain, dependence of dilatation angle<br />
on plastic strain, mean grain diameter, and micropolar constants.<br />
a) b)<br />
c) d)<br />
Fig. 3.15. Comparison of the particle displacement (a, b) and rotation (c, d) fields obtained from the<br />
discrete method (a, c) and the continuum method (b, d) for the case of loading by (a, b) normal and<br />
shear stress (c, d) couple stresses [32]