05.03.2014 Views

Strona 2_redak - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana Dobrzańskiego ...

Strona 2_redak - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana Dobrzańskiego ...

Strona 2_redak - Instytut Agrofizyki im. Bohdana Dobrzańskiego ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

41<br />

Tapped density provides information on the susceptibility of a granular material<br />

to compaction through vibrations. The relevant standard provides for a measurement<br />

consisting in bringing a known mass of a granular material to the lowest volume<br />

possible through the application of vibrations of constant amplitude and frequency<br />

[138. The tapped density of cereal grain is higher than the bulk density by several<br />

percent, and in some cases even by over twenty percent [159.<br />

Chang et al. [31] showed that distributed filling of silo increases the density of<br />

granular material by from 5.1 to 9.2% as compared to filling from centrally located<br />

spout of conveyor. Stephens and Foster [155] observed increases in density of the<br />

order of 3 to 5% above the bulk density values in condensed filling from spout of a<br />

conveyor, and 7% in the case of distributed filling. Versavel and Britton [166]<br />

showed that density depends on the falling height, the degree of contamination, and<br />

on the filling rate. The researchers noted a considerable increase in density, of the<br />

order of 8-10%, and in the case of high filling rates a decrease in density. S<strong>im</strong>ilar<br />

relations were found by Schott and Britton [150] in laboratory studies. With<br />

increasing grain falling height the kinetic energy of the grain increases, which<br />

increases the packing density of the material [116]. That effect disappears above<br />

a certain height, due to increasing aerodynamic drag during the free fall of the grain.<br />

Table 5.1. Bulk density, porosity and specific gravity of grain [3]<br />

Grain<br />

Barley<br />

Rape<br />

Maize<br />

Linseed<br />

Oat<br />

Rice<br />

Rye<br />

Soy<br />

Wheat<br />

Bulk density<br />

(kg m -3 )<br />

618<br />

669<br />

721<br />

721<br />

412<br />

579<br />

721<br />

772<br />

772<br />

Moisture<br />

(%)<br />

9.7-10.7<br />

6.5-6.7<br />

9-15<br />

5.8<br />

9.4-10.3<br />

11.9-12.4<br />

9.7<br />

6.9-7.0<br />

9.8<br />

Porosity<br />

(%)<br />

39.5-57.6<br />

38.4-38.9<br />

40.0-44.0<br />

34.6<br />

47.6-55.5<br />

46.5-50.4<br />

41.2<br />

33.8-36.1<br />

39.6-42.6<br />

Specific gravity<br />

(kN m -3 )<br />

12.1-13.3<br />

11.0-11.5<br />

11.9-13.0<br />

11.0<br />

9.5-10.6<br />

11.1-11.2<br />

12.3<br />

11.3-11.8<br />

12.9-13.2<br />

In view of the wide range of variation and considerable number of factors affecting<br />

density, attempts are made at developing methods for the determination of „apparent<br />

density” that would correspond to the density of a material in a silo. Therefore, it is<br />

necessary to search for general rules applicable to the determination of the actual<br />

density of granular media in containers that would be common for as extensive a class<br />

of materials as possible. Basing on exper<strong>im</strong>ental results obtained so far it is recommended<br />

to est<strong>im</strong>ate the density of a granular material in a silo by assuming an<br />

average density increase of 6% with relation to the density value determined from the<br />

mass of 1 hectolitre [22]. It appears, however, that application of more accurate<br />

methods for the prediction of density of granular material deposit is a necessity.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!