05.03.2014 Views

Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA

Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA

Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 7. <strong>Flare</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Family</strong><br />

in the baseline scenario or to the new internal combustion engine drivers for power<br />

generation in the project scenario; 21<br />

• Fuel combustion and fugitive emissions from operation of the engine drivers for power<br />

generation on crude oil fuel in the baseline scenario and primarily on associated gas in the<br />

project scenario;<br />

• Electric pumps powered by the on-site engine drivers will continue to be used for<br />

transporting crude oil by pipeline to an off-site point of sale, as is the case in the baseline<br />

scenario; and<br />

• No substantive life cycle or leakage issues are caused by the project activity.<br />

Table 7-10 lists the potential emission sources within the assessment boundary and affords a<br />

comparison between the types of emissions present in the baseline scenario and project activity.<br />

Table 7-10. Case Study #3 Assessment Boundary Determination<br />

Baseline Scenario<br />

Extraction and<br />

Separation of<br />

Produced Oil and<br />

Associated Gas<br />

Gas Treatment<br />

Potential Emission Sources<br />

CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O<br />

combustion emissions<br />

from the extraction and<br />

separation of associated<br />

gas from produced oil<br />

Vented and fugitive CH 4<br />

emissions, associated with<br />

the separation of the<br />

associated gas from<br />

produced oil<br />

CO 2 , CH 4 and N 2 O<br />

combustion emissions<br />

from dehydration and<br />

compression of associated<br />

gas<br />

Vented and fugitive CH 4<br />

emissions from<br />

dehydration and<br />

compression of associated<br />

gas<br />

Relation to the<br />

<strong>Project</strong><br />

Proponent<br />

Controlled<br />

Controlled<br />

Considerations<br />

Emissions are unchanged by the<br />

project activity, and thus cancel<br />

out in the calculation of project<br />

emission reductions<br />

Emissions are unchanged by the<br />

project activity, and thus cancel<br />

out in the calculation of project<br />

emission reductions<br />

21 Compression and removal of water from the gas stream sent to the flare is assumed in this hypothetical case for<br />

the baseline scenario. Depending on site-specific factors, including the pressure and moisture content of the<br />

associated gas, this equipment may not be necessary for the gas stream to the flare.<br />

October 2009 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!