05.03.2014 Views

Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA

Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA

Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 7. <strong>Flare</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Family</strong><br />

Table 7-11. Applicability and History of Approved CDM Baseline Methodologies for <strong>Flare</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> <strong>Project</strong>s,<br />

continued<br />

Methodology<br />

AM0009<br />

(continued)<br />

Version<br />

Date<br />

Approved<br />

History of Methodology<br />

Development<br />

and Revisions<br />

Notes<br />

The explicit prohibition against the use of AM0009 for projects<br />

involved with gas lift could exclude a fairly high fraction of oil wells<br />

from CDM consideration.<br />

A clarification was requested (AM_CLA_0073) as to whether<br />

projects that replace non-associated gas with previously flared gas<br />

would qualify under Version 03. This was denied by the<br />

Methodology Panel on the grounds that associated gas and its<br />

products can only be used for energy purposes.<br />

A revision was proposed to: (1) expand AM0009 activities to include<br />

projects where captured associated gas is compressed and transported<br />

by trucks to end-users (i.e., CNG); and (2) allow for mixing of<br />

associated and non-associated gas while ensuring that only emissions<br />

from flaring of associated gas are counted in the baseline emissions.<br />

The request for revision was not approved for the following reasons:<br />

• The baseline selection should include a procedure to identify<br />

baseline scenarios for end-user facilities (What fuel would be<br />

used in the absence of the project?)<br />

• At its 36th meeting, the CDM EB clarified that project<br />

activities that result in emission reductions due to the use of a<br />

product produced in the project activity are only eligible as a<br />

CDM project activity if: (1) the users of the product are<br />

included in the project boundary; and (2) monitoring takes<br />

place of the actual use and location of the product used by<br />

consumers. This means end-user facilities must be included<br />

in the project boundary.<br />

In response to this guidance from the EB, the Methodology Panel<br />

determined that procedures for monitoring the final use of CNG at<br />

end-user facilities needed to be developed.<br />

03 30<br />

November<br />

2007<br />

Revised methodology: Amendments<br />

expanded applicability to include project<br />

activities where associated gas is vented in<br />

the baseline. Other changes included the<br />

following:<br />

• The term “gas recovered at oil<br />

wells” used in previous versions of<br />

the methodology was changed to<br />

“associated gas.”<br />

• A restriction prohibiting the use of<br />

the methodology for recovered gas<br />

streams used for gas lift was<br />

added, as was a direction to<br />

evaluate project additionality using<br />

a new “Additionality Tool”<br />

developed by UNFCCC.<br />

• Changes were made in the<br />

algorithms for calculation of<br />

project emissions to rely more<br />

heavily on measurements.<br />

• A new limitation was added to<br />

limit changes in the production of<br />

high pressure gas extracted at the<br />

production site.<br />

October 2009 58

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!