Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA
Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA
Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Section 7. <strong>Flare</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Family</strong><br />
Table 7-11. Applicability and History of Approved CDM Baseline Methodologies for <strong>Flare</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> <strong>Project</strong>s,<br />
continued<br />
Methodology<br />
AM0009<br />
(continued)<br />
Version<br />
Date<br />
Approved<br />
History of Methodology<br />
Development<br />
and Revisions<br />
Notes<br />
The explicit prohibition against the use of AM0009 for projects<br />
involved with gas lift could exclude a fairly high fraction of oil wells<br />
from CDM consideration.<br />
A clarification was requested (AM_CLA_0073) as to whether<br />
projects that replace non-associated gas with previously flared gas<br />
would qualify under Version 03. This was denied by the<br />
Methodology Panel on the grounds that associated gas and its<br />
products can only be used for energy purposes.<br />
A revision was proposed to: (1) expand AM0009 activities to include<br />
projects where captured associated gas is compressed and transported<br />
by trucks to end-users (i.e., CNG); and (2) allow for mixing of<br />
associated and non-associated gas while ensuring that only emissions<br />
from flaring of associated gas are counted in the baseline emissions.<br />
The request for revision was not approved for the following reasons:<br />
• The baseline selection should include a procedure to identify<br />
baseline scenarios for end-user facilities (What fuel would be<br />
used in the absence of the project?)<br />
• At its 36th meeting, the CDM EB clarified that project<br />
activities that result in emission reductions due to the use of a<br />
product produced in the project activity are only eligible as a<br />
CDM project activity if: (1) the users of the product are<br />
included in the project boundary; and (2) monitoring takes<br />
place of the actual use and location of the product used by<br />
consumers. This means end-user facilities must be included<br />
in the project boundary.<br />
In response to this guidance from the EB, the Methodology Panel<br />
determined that procedures for monitoring the final use of CNG at<br />
end-user facilities needed to be developed.<br />
03 30<br />
November<br />
2007<br />
Revised methodology: Amendments<br />
expanded applicability to include project<br />
activities where associated gas is vented in<br />
the baseline. Other changes included the<br />
following:<br />
• The term “gas recovered at oil<br />
wells” used in previous versions of<br />
the methodology was changed to<br />
“associated gas.”<br />
• A restriction prohibiting the use of<br />
the methodology for recovered gas<br />
streams used for gas lift was<br />
added, as was a direction to<br />
evaluate project additionality using<br />
a new “Additionality Tool”<br />
developed by UNFCCC.<br />
• Changes were made in the<br />
algorithms for calculation of<br />
project emissions to rely more<br />
heavily on measurements.<br />
• A new limitation was added to<br />
limit changes in the production of<br />
high pressure gas extracted at the<br />
production site.<br />
October 2009 58