05.03.2014 Views

Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA

Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA

Part III: Flare Reduction Project Family - IPIECA

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Section 7. <strong>Flare</strong> <strong>Reduction</strong> <strong>Project</strong> <strong>Family</strong><br />

compression to prepare this gas for use as fuel in the generator engine drivers in the<br />

project scenario. 22 Similarly, the minor combustion and fugitive emissions associated<br />

with oil-gas separation in the baseline scenario are unchanged by implementation of the<br />

project.<br />

• All of the gas flared in the baseline scenario is used as fuel in the project scenario.<br />

However the quantity of gas is sufficient to meet only 90% of the required annual fuel<br />

stream to the replacement engines, with the remaining 10% of the fuel still supplied in the<br />

form of crude oil.<br />

• Electric power generating capacity in the baseline scenario using the existing engines is<br />

950 kW. The thermal efficiency of these engines burning only crude oil is 28%. Most of<br />

the produced electrical energy is used to drive electric pumps for shipment of the<br />

remaining produced crude oil to an off-site destination.<br />

What the project will change:<br />

• The quantity of crude oil used for power generation in the project scenario is 2,362<br />

barrels per year. This scenario thus enables 11,601 additional barrels of crude to be<br />

shipped to markets compared with the baseline scenario. The increase in fugitive<br />

emissions associated with this increment of crude oil shipping is negligibly small.<br />

• Electric power generating capacity in the project scenario uses new, more efficient<br />

engines rated at 1350 kW, and these engines are configured to operate on both associated<br />

gas and crude oil fuel. The thermal efficiency of the replacement engines is 33% on<br />

associated gas fuel and 30% on crude oil.<br />

EXHIBIT 7.3:<br />

<strong>Flare</strong> Gas Recovery for On-Site Power Generation<br />

<strong>Project</strong> Information (based on hypothetical, measured data):<br />

• 2.62×10 6 m 3 /year (92.56×10 6 scf/yr) of processed associated gas is sent to the flare in<br />

the baseline scenario.<br />

• The carbon content of the processed associated gas is 0.65 kg carbon/m 3 (0.0404 lb<br />

C/scf).<br />

• In the baseline scenario, crude oil fuel consumption for operation of the internal<br />

combustion engine drivers used to generate electricity for on-site combustion is 13,963<br />

barrels per year.<br />

• Average carbon content of the produced crude after gas and water separation is 85%<br />

by weight, and the higher heating value of this crude oil is 570 MMBtu/barrel.<br />

22 As noted previously, if gas dehydration and compression equipment were not present in the baseline scenario,<br />

their addition in the project scenario would create new emissions.<br />

October 2009 50

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!