29.03.2014 Views

May 2011 - Illuminating Engineering Society

May 2011 - Illuminating Engineering Society

May 2011 - Illuminating Engineering Society

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

APPS + ANSWERS<br />

Defeating Incrementalism<br />

by Don Peifer<br />

As we walk the<br />

halls of LIGHTFAIR,<br />

it’s fair to ask:<br />

is the industry<br />

evolving at a quick<br />

enough pace?<br />

We work in the field of light. How<br />

cool is that? Yet, at the end of<br />

the day, the tools of the trade<br />

that the specifier community<br />

has at its disposal seem banal. Every<br />

once in a while something noteworthy<br />

pops out of the weeds—an impressive<br />

performance here, or an interesting form<br />

factor there. Those instances seem few<br />

and far between, however.<br />

If I meet my deadline, this article will be<br />

handed out to the participants at LIGHTFAIR<br />

in Philadelphia. Amidst the glare of streetlights<br />

and everything LED, the spectacle<br />

has become, on the one hand, overwhelming<br />

from the standpoint of sheer scale and,<br />

on the other hand, underwhelming from the<br />

standpoint of innovation. Formulaic is the<br />

word that comes to mind. To the practiced<br />

eye, themes quickly emerge as you walk the<br />

space. Manufacturers in the era of reverse<br />

engineering may be reluctant to fully open<br />

the kimono, but that results in offerings that<br />

are by and large tame. As an industry, we<br />

take incremental steps each year. I think it<br />

is fair to pose the question: are we evolving<br />

at a quick enough pace?<br />

The reason I ask is that it seems that in<br />

other industries, there is a much more prodigious<br />

race to compete, more of a mandate<br />

to innovate and take chances. Considering<br />

how far LED technology has come in the<br />

last few years, you would think we could<br />

expect more from luminaires. The DOE<br />

recently announced the winners of the Next<br />

Generation Luminaire awards for LED products.<br />

The general illumination winner had<br />

flux of 1,615 lumens. The judges said that<br />

while they appreciated the aesthetics (i.e.,<br />

this is the only product we would consider<br />

specifying), they questioned whether the<br />

light output was sufficient. I’ll save you the<br />

suspense: it’s not. It is, in fact, a non-starter.<br />

There are some very impressive LED performers<br />

out there currently. Where is the<br />

luminaire, however, that is that rare combination<br />

of performance, quality, value and<br />

aesthetics? That shoe has been in the air<br />

forever it seems, and you wonder if the<br />

creation of that product is even encoded into<br />

the industry’s DNA? LIGHTFAIR is a walking<br />

billboard to this disconnect with its separate<br />

design pavilion where “decorative lighting”<br />

is displayed. If you are looking for design, go<br />

here; for everything else, go there.<br />

LESSONS FROM OUTSIDE OUR WORLD<br />

I spoke to an industrial designer recently<br />

and asked him to show me an example of<br />

an interesting product. He reached into his<br />

pocket and pulled out a PDA. The fact that<br />

(a) it wasn’t an iPhone and (b) the product<br />

was exceedingly cool really hit me. It is survival<br />

of the fittest in that industry—evolution<br />

at a much faster pace as a function of<br />

market pressure. If you look at the Apple<br />

product catalog—especially against the<br />

canvas of the competitive space—there<br />

are several observations that could be<br />

used as a primer in our industry.<br />

1. Differentiate. Products in the lighting<br />

industry are more often than not what<br />

I call laterally derivative. One manufacturer’s<br />

luminaire is indiscernible<br />

from another’s. That doesn’t happen at<br />

Apple. Much of that is a function of having<br />

very few decision makers. It seems<br />

inevitable in luminaire companies that<br />

engineers beat up a design, manufacturing<br />

does the same and the end result<br />

is homogenous and uninspired. Apple<br />

demands the impossible. Products are<br />

34 <strong>May</strong> <strong>2011</strong> | LD+A www.ies.org

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!