05.04.2014 Views

Hawai'i Fisheries Initiative - The Hawaii Institute for Public Affairs

Hawai'i Fisheries Initiative - The Hawaii Institute for Public Affairs

Hawai'i Fisheries Initiative - The Hawaii Institute for Public Affairs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

u Leases may not conflict with konohiki<br />

fishing rights, including the right to sublease<br />

private konohiki fishing grounds. 127<br />

u Revenue from state marine waters leases is<br />

deposited into a special land development<br />

fund earmarked <strong>for</strong> planning, research, and<br />

development of the aquaculture industry,<br />

excluding the portion of revenues subject<br />

to chapter 10, the public land trust fund. 128<br />

u State aquaculture loans (financial assistance<br />

<strong>for</strong> development of the aquaculture<br />

industry in the state) are administered by<br />

the Department of Agriculture. 129<br />

Environmental Concerns:<br />

Is Aquaculture Simply<br />

an “Open Ocean Feed Lot”?<br />

Environmental concerns – escape of farmed<br />

fish into the wild population and possible<br />

resulting genetic contamination, excess<br />

feed, water pollution – are required by the<br />

Act to be addressed by measures intended<br />

to avoid, minimize, or mitigate impacts.<br />

NOAA is also authorized to take emergency<br />

corrective measures if necessary. 130 Funding<br />

<strong>for</strong> research and technology is included<br />

in the 2007 bill, but absent is a provision<br />

<strong>for</strong> royalty or lease payments <strong>for</strong> private<br />

use of the ocean, a public resource. This is<br />

unlike other federal laws, such as those <strong>for</strong><br />

offshore oil and gas leases. 131<br />

Open-ocean aquaculture meets differing<br />

receptions. Calls <strong>for</strong> action – cooperative<br />

action between fishers and environmental<br />

groups – support strong legislative controls<br />

and en<strong>for</strong>cement to ensure that aquaculture<br />

operations do not threaten living marine<br />

resources, fishers’ livelihoods, or the<br />

environment. In an opinion article <strong>for</strong> the<br />

Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen’s<br />

Associations, fishers called <strong>for</strong> specific<br />

controls: “[No] aquaculture should be<br />

permitted in coastal waters or the EEZ<br />

unless it can first be demonstrated to:<br />

1) be non-polluting; 2) not spread disease<br />

or parasites into the wild; 3) not allow<br />

escape of fish; 4) use only native stocks,<br />

and no non-natives or genetically<br />

modified fish; 5) not interfere with or<br />

impair fishing or maritime activities; and<br />

6) result in a net increase in usable protein<br />

(not the net loss that now occurs with<br />

shrimp, salmon and most carnivorous<br />

finfish aquaculture operations).” 132<br />

Photo courtesy Aquaculture Development Program<br />

33

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!