05.04.2014 Views

Hawai'i Fisheries Initiative - The Hawaii Institute for Public Affairs

Hawai'i Fisheries Initiative - The Hawaii Institute for Public Affairs

Hawai'i Fisheries Initiative - The Hawaii Institute for Public Affairs

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

U.S. Zones: From<br />

Shoreline to Sea<br />

n Territorial Sea: measured from the baseline<br />

(the mean low water line) seaward to 12 nm.<br />

A nation has absolute sovereignty<br />

within this zone, subject to innocent passage<br />

by <strong>for</strong>eign vessels.<br />

n Contiguous Zone: from 12 to 24 nm, a zone<br />

of “limited en<strong>for</strong>cement jurisdiction.” This zone<br />

enables en<strong>for</strong>cement of provisions <strong>for</strong> drug<br />

interdiction, <strong>for</strong> example.<br />

n Exclusive Economic Zone (EEZ): Including<br />

the Contiguous Zone, the EEZ begins at the<br />

territorial sea’s boundary and extends to<br />

200 nm from the baseline.<br />

n High seas and deep seabed: beyond a<br />

nation’s EEZ, this area is subject to international<br />

agreements, treaties, and customary<br />

law of the sea. 357<br />

<strong>The</strong> U.S. agenda included preservation of<br />

its navigational and overflight rights <strong>for</strong><br />

its navy and air <strong>for</strong>ces; in the midst of the<br />

Cold War, the United States did not want<br />

interference with its ability to send its<br />

<strong>for</strong>ces throughout the world, so it opposed<br />

the extension of jurisdiction. U.S. fishing<br />

fleets were divided: <strong>The</strong> coastal fishermen<br />

preferred a 200-mile zone and the distantwater<br />

fishers did not. 353<br />

In 1976, in response to increased near-shore<br />

fishing pressure from <strong>for</strong>eign fleets and in<br />

the midst of UNCLOS III discussions, the<br />

U.S. Congress passed the Fishery Conservation<br />

and Management Act (precursor to<br />

today’s Magnuson-Stevens Act), effectively<br />

establishing a 200-nm exclusive fishing zone<br />

to protect the domestic fishing industry. 354<br />

This action ensured two things: that this<br />

measure would be part of the U.N. Law of<br />

the Sea Treaty, and that the 200-mile EEZ<br />

was on its way to becoming customary<br />

international law. Ultimately in 1982, the<br />

U.S. voted against the treaty largely due<br />

to its provisions on deep-seabed mining.<br />

Internationally, however, the treaty was<br />

broadly accepted; 155 nations became<br />

parties by June 2007. 355 While the U.S.<br />

is not a party, it remains bound by the<br />

treaty’s impact on the customary law of<br />

the sea. 356 Among the recommendations<br />

of the Joint Oceans Commission is that<br />

the U.S. accede to UNCLOS III, suggesting<br />

that doing so would allow the U.S. to lead<br />

the way in international policymaking <strong>for</strong><br />

deep-seabed mining, energy, scientific<br />

research, pollution control, and environmental<br />

protection.<br />

In 1983, the United States followed the<br />

treaty provisions and extended its EEZ by<br />

proclamation. In 1988, the United States<br />

extended its territorial sea to 12 nm, and<br />

then to 24 nm in 1999. An important aside<br />

is that the 1988 proclamation was limited<br />

to its effects on international relations, and<br />

is not applicable to domestic law as it is<br />

applied to the territorial sea.<br />

75

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!