Child Pornography: - Center for Problem-Oriented Policing
Child Pornography: - Center for Problem-Oriented Policing
Child Pornography: - Center for Problem-Oriented Policing
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
424. INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF CHILD ABUSE, supra note 345, at 106.<br />
425. Id.<br />
426. See Privacy Protection Act, 42 U.S.C. § 2000aa et seq.; Electronics Communications Privacy Act, 42<br />
U.S.C. §§ 2510 et seq. & 2701 et seq.; Cable Communications Policy Act, 47 U.S.C. § 251 et seq. See also<br />
Armagh, Battaglia & Lanning, supra note 5, at 20-22.<br />
427. For a comprehensive guide on these issues, see the Department of Justice's portable guide Use of<br />
Computers in the Sexual Exploitation of <strong>Child</strong>ren. Armagh, Battaglia & Lanning, supra note 5.<br />
428. Lanning & Farley, supra note 95, at 21.<br />
429. INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF CHILD ABUSE, supra note 345, at 106.<br />
430. Lanning, Cyber "Pedophiles, "supra note 7, *\ 4.13.<br />
431. Id.<br />
432. Id.<br />
433. See Id.<br />
434. PROSECUTING INTERNET CHILD EXPLOITATION CRIMES (James M. Peters ed., US Department of Justice, USABook<br />
in press). For sample search warrants, see INVESTIGATION AND PROSECUTION OF CHILD ABUSE, supra note 345; PROS-<br />
ECUTING INTERNET CHILD EXPLOITATION CRIMES, supra this note; CHILD SEXUAL EXPLOITATION INVESTIGATIONS (TRAINING<br />
MANUAL) (Office of Juvenile Justice and Delinquency Prevention & Fox Valley Technical College 2000).<br />
435. Walsh, supra note 412, at 10-5.<br />
436. Personal communication from Lieutenant William Walsh, Dallas (Texas) Police Department (December<br />
10,2000).<br />
437. Lanning & Farley, supra note 95, at 19.<br />
438. Personal communication from Lieutenant William Walsh, Dallas (Texas) Police Department (January<br />
18,2001).<br />
439. Personal communication from Lieutenant William Walsh, Dallas (Texas) Police Department (December<br />
10,2000).<br />
440. Armagh, Battaglia & Lanning, supra note 5, at 14.<br />
441. Id.<br />
442. See Armagh, Battaglia & Lanning, supra note 5; Janet E. Kosid, Considerations in Obtaining and<br />
Using Expertise Search Warrants in Cases of Preferential <strong>Child</strong> Molesters, see Lanning, CHILD MOLESTERS,<br />
supra note 31; Lanning & Farley, supra note 95, at 17, 19.<br />
443. Id. See United States v. Rabe, 848 F.2d 994 (9th Cir. 1988) (search warrant executed in 1986 based in<br />
part on 1984 seizure of obscene materials mailed to defendant upheld); State v. Batchelder, 824F.2d563 (7th<br />
Circuit 1988) upholding warrant issued on nine-month-old in<strong>for</strong>mation).<br />
444. Armagh, Battaglia & Lanning, supra note 5, at 15. See also State v. Smith, 805 P.2d (Wash. Ct. App.<br />
1991) (law-en<strong>for</strong>cement expert's opinion that defendant fit "pedophile profile" did not create probable cause<br />
to search when affidavit failed to set <strong>for</strong>th description of recent criminal conduct); Hightower v. State, 736<br />
S.W.2d 949 (Tex. Ct. App. 1987), aff'd, 822 S.W.2d 48 (Tex. Crim. App. 1991) (photographs of children,<br />
pedophiliac literature, and pornographic materials reasonably included in warrant because officer testified<br />
child molesters often possess such materials); In re Duncan, 234 Cal. Rptr. 877 (Ct. App.), cert. denied, 484<br />
U.S. 985 (1987) (expert's assertions that defendant fit characteristics of pedophile and likely retained<br />
materials <strong>for</strong> personal gratification, along with copy of letter to undercover agent with sexually explicit<br />
photographs of children sufficient to constitute probable cause); People v. Frank, 700 P.2d 415 (Cal. 1985),<br />
cert. denied, 111 S. Ct. 2816 (1991); People v. Holmsen, 219 Cal. Rptr. 598 (Ct. App. 1985). See also Kosid,<br />
in Lanning, CHILD MOLESTERS, supra note 31, Lanning, CHILD SEX RINGS, supra note 77.<br />
445. For a more detailed analysis of these exceptions, especially as they relate to computers used in the<br />
sexual exploitation of children, see Armagh, Battaglia & Lanning, supra note 5, at 15-23.<br />
446. United States v. Reed, 935 F.2d 641 (4th Cir.), cert. denied, 1125 S.Ct. 923 (1991).<br />
CHILD PORNOGRAPHY: THE CRIMINAL-JUSTICE-SYSTEM RESPONSE- 143