17.06.2014 Views

Notes for the Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul - Rudy Rucker

Notes for the Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul - Rudy Rucker

Notes for the Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul - Rudy Rucker

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Notes</strong> <strong>for</strong> The <strong>Lifebox</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Seashell</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Soul</strong>, by <strong>Rudy</strong> <strong>Rucker</strong><br />

How to Use a New Kind of Science to Change Your Life<br />

Waking Up From <strong>the</strong> Dream of Logic To Surf <strong>the</strong> Seas of Postmodern Gnarly<br />

Computation<br />

Secret of Reality?<br />

Secrets of <strong>the</strong> Universe<br />

What one cyberpunk learned in Silicon Valley about gnarly computation, ultimate<br />

reality, <strong>the</strong> meaning of life, <strong>and</strong> how to be happy.<br />

(d) Wolfram mentioned of course his own NKS <strong>and</strong> Misner, Thorne <strong>and</strong> Wheeler's<br />

Gravitation as being memorably striking books-as-totem-objects. He thinks it's useful if <strong>the</strong><br />

cover without <strong>the</strong> dust jacket look totemic as well. Should I start kicking ideas around with<br />

Georgia? I kind of like that image I made <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> title page, though it would be better if it<br />

were shaped more like a brain, which could be done.<br />

Does totemic have to mean black with yellow like NKS?<br />

***<br />

Oakes says stick with <strong>the</strong> equations, don’t listen to Wolfie too much because, after<br />

all, W got famous first <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>n had a publishing success, he’s not necessarily that<br />

knowledgeable about publishing.<br />

Oakes likes <strong>the</strong> subtitle idea, though. I’m liking it like this:<br />

The <strong>Lifebox</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Seashell</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Soul</strong><br />

What Gnarly Computation Taught Me about<br />

Ultimate Reality, <strong>the</strong> Meaning Of Life, <strong>and</strong> How To Be Happy<br />

Or use “Teaches Us” instead of “Taught Me” to be less egotrippic? On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

h<strong>and</strong>, <strong>the</strong> transreal memoir aspect is good.<br />

December 3-6, 2004. Revising.<br />

12/3/2004. So I didn’t touch <strong>the</strong> book <strong>for</strong> about two months. I was waiting <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

peer suggestions, mostly I got <strong>the</strong>m from Scott Aaronson <strong>and</strong> John Walker, also two of<br />

Wolfram’s assistants Boguta <strong>and</strong> Crawley chimed in. There were so many nitpicks that <strong>for</strong><br />

awhile I couldn’t face <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

Meanwhile I worked on getting my novel Ma<strong>the</strong>maticians In Love going. A nice<br />

change, getting back to fiction. Got <strong>the</strong> first chapter done, <strong>and</strong> something of a plot outline.<br />

Then I was running into plot problems so went back to face <strong>the</strong> <strong>Lifebox</strong> music. I did all <strong>the</strong><br />

fixes over <strong>the</strong> last couple of weeks, by <strong>the</strong> end I was ready to choke Walker <strong>and</strong> Aaronson,<br />

which shows what a bad, ungrateful person I am. After my seventeenth day of revisions, I<br />

made <strong>the</strong> mistake of emailing <strong>the</strong>m <strong>and</strong> telling <strong>the</strong>m that I wanted to choke <strong>the</strong>m; Walker’s<br />

used to me <strong>and</strong> understood, I’m not sure about Scott, haven’t heard back from him, better<br />

send an apology.<br />

And now I printed out <strong>the</strong> fixed version <strong>and</strong> am rereading that <strong>and</strong> correcting. This<br />

will be my first full read-through, so I’m expecting to catch a lot of continuity things. Today<br />

I did section 1.1, what a mess, I was floundering when I wrote it, unsure where I was going<br />

<strong>and</strong> had a lot of extra crap. I cut 1,500 words from it. I hope <strong>the</strong> rest of <strong>the</strong> manuscript isn’t<br />

as bad. I have to say that doing this work is hard, I’m somehow not that into <strong>the</strong> project<br />

anymore, I just want it out of my life. But maybe I’ll get excited again.<br />

p. 137

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!