Notes for the Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul - Rudy Rucker
Notes for the Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul - Rudy Rucker
Notes for the Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul - Rudy Rucker
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Notes</strong> <strong>for</strong> The <strong>Lifebox</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Seashell</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Soul</strong>, by <strong>Rudy</strong> <strong>Rucker</strong><br />
Thought Experiment 6 “Hello Infinity”<br />
A lawyer doing his taxes becomes able to count up to infinity in seconds (seems like a<br />
T ~ P phenomenon). His wife, a research microbiologist has a new “skinscope” that can<br />
zoom in infinitely far in a finite amount of time (seems like P ~ T). They join <strong>for</strong>ces to make<br />
a new kind of computer (P = T = C after all).<br />
Thought Experiment 6A: “The Next Big Thing”<br />
A woman meets a man from <strong>the</strong> future who tries to tell her about an energy <strong>for</strong>ce<br />
called kvaar, but at first she can’t underst<strong>and</strong> him. And <strong>the</strong>n she realizes that kvaar is<br />
consciousness, <strong>the</strong> next big thing after computation.<br />
Maybe instead I should do Deutsch’s experiment?<br />
And how about a parody story called “Quantum In<strong>for</strong>mation” about all those dumbsounding<br />
Alice <strong>and</strong> Bob examples in “The Heisenberg Representation of Quantum<br />
Computers,” by Daniel Gottesman.<br />
Thought Experiment 6B: “The Best Show Ever”<br />
A woman experiences <strong>the</strong> Singularity over <strong>the</strong> course of an afternoon, sitting on her<br />
couch watching news TV. The Web wakes up. At <strong>the</strong> end she falls into <strong>the</strong> TV, which has<br />
become a universal quantum Turing machine.<br />
Titles<br />
I’m listing <strong>the</strong>se ideas in categories, <strong>and</strong> in reverse order within each category, with<br />
<strong>the</strong> newer ones come first.<br />
“The Facts” titles are straight-up <strong>and</strong> with a single-meaning. The “Beyond <strong>the</strong> Facts”<br />
titles try <strong>and</strong> put in something like a dialectic triad <strong>and</strong>/or to avoid <strong>the</strong> word “computer.” The<br />
“Quirky” titles are miscellaneous odd notions.<br />
Re: “The Facts,” I have been thinking it would be nice to have a book I could use as a<br />
text <strong>for</strong> our SJSU course, who’s catalog description is as follows. “CS 040: Introduction to<br />
Computers. For students with little or no computer experience. Topics include: history of<br />
computing, user interfaces, computer applications, programming, hardware <strong>and</strong> software,<br />
computer networks.”<br />
If <strong>the</strong> book were to work as a possible CS 40 text, you wouldn’t want to put too much<br />
reverse-English on <strong>the</strong> title.<br />
Computation <strong>and</strong> Reality<br />
Computers <strong>and</strong> Reality. Straight up, <strong>the</strong> truth about what <strong>the</strong> book is. Harks back to<br />
my very first non-fiction book title ever, “Geometry <strong>and</strong> Reality,” <strong>the</strong> title of <strong>the</strong> notes that<br />
later grew into my Dover book on 4D. But is “reality” too much of an old-time stoner word?<br />
:) Funny question to ask, harrumph, is <strong>the</strong> very ground of our being an outmoded concept?<br />
No, I think reality is okay, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> pairing is clear. The high concept is simply that<br />
my book is about ways in which (a) <strong>the</strong> physical world is or isn’t like a computation <strong>and</strong> (b)<br />
<strong>the</strong> mind is or isn’t like a computation<br />
Variations on this <strong>the</strong>me.<br />
p. 29