17.06.2014 Views

Notes for the Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul - Rudy Rucker

Notes for the Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul - Rudy Rucker

Notes for the Lifebox, the Seashell, and the Soul - Rudy Rucker

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>Notes</strong> <strong>for</strong> The <strong>Lifebox</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Seashell</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Soul</strong>, by <strong>Rudy</strong> <strong>Rucker</strong><br />

ma<strong>the</strong>matics <strong>and</strong> I’ve published three somewhat philosophical books about ma<strong>the</strong>matics:<br />

Infinity <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> Mind, The Fourth Dimension, <strong>and</strong> Mind Tools.<br />

Each of those earlier non-fiction books was devoted to a specific <strong>the</strong>me, <strong>and</strong> so is<br />

The <strong>Lifebox</strong>, <strong>the</strong> <strong>Seashell</strong>, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Soul</strong>. The earlier books treated infinity, higher<br />

dimensions, <strong>and</strong> in<strong>for</strong>mation. And <strong>the</strong> book you hold is about computation.<br />

Levels of Software (The Tao of Duh)<br />

To be quite general, we might let <strong>the</strong> system software includes all <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r software<br />

hidden in <strong>the</strong> machine. At <strong>the</strong> lowest level <strong>the</strong>re’s something called microcode that lives on<br />

<strong>the</strong> computer chip <strong>and</strong> tells it how to interpret machine-language instructions. A step up is<br />

<strong>the</strong> BIOS (Basic Input/Output Services) software, which also lives on a chip. The BIOS<br />

helps <strong>the</strong> computer wake up <strong>and</strong> begin reading <strong>the</strong> software that lives on <strong>the</strong> hard drive. At a<br />

third level of system software we find an operating system such as Windows, Linux, or <strong>the</strong><br />

Mac OS.<br />

Taken toge<strong>the</strong>r, <strong>the</strong> various layers of system software are, if you will, like <strong>the</strong><br />

unconscious, memorized knowledge of <strong>the</strong> machine. And <strong>the</strong> application software is like <strong>the</strong><br />

specific instructions <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> specific task at h<strong>and</strong>.<br />

Ordinary users (it’s interesting that society employs <strong>the</strong> same word <strong>for</strong> computer<br />

owners <strong>and</strong> drug addicts!) rarely change <strong>the</strong>ir system software. The only way to get new<br />

microcode is to physically install a new processor chip. Changing <strong>the</strong> BIOS involves a<br />

perilous process called “flashing <strong>the</strong> EPROM,” <strong>and</strong> is normally attempted only by true geeks<br />

(we, of course, love doing it). And even changing <strong>the</strong> operating system, e.g. by succumbing<br />

to a Windows “upgrade,” has a substantial probability of turning your computer into a<br />

doorstop.<br />

***<br />

Returning to <strong>the</strong> notion of hardware, in our personal computers we distinguish<br />

between <strong>the</strong> microprocessor chip <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> memory. In any generalized kind of rule-obeying<br />

system, if we can single out some element that embodies <strong>the</strong> action of <strong>the</strong> rules, we’ll call<br />

this element <strong>the</strong> processor. And, by <strong>the</strong> same token, if <strong>the</strong>re’s some element of <strong>the</strong> system<br />

that retains traces of <strong>the</strong> system’s states, we’ll call this <strong>the</strong> memory.<br />

Bohr’s Walking Stick, Illustrating Stored Program Concept<br />

In this connection I’d like to mention an analogy I once read in an essay by <strong>the</strong><br />

physicist Niels Bohr. The essay was about <strong>the</strong> relationship between observers, <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

experimental apparatus, <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> reality <strong>the</strong>y investigate. But <strong>the</strong> pattern is <strong>the</strong> same.<br />

p. 47

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!