Annual Meeting Preliminary Program - Full Brochure (PDF) - SME
Annual Meeting Preliminary Program - Full Brochure (PDF) - SME
Annual Meeting Preliminary Program - Full Brochure (PDF) - SME
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
TECHNICAL PROGRAM<br />
2:25 PM<br />
Investigation of Pit Slope Depressurisation for an Open Pit Iron<br />
Ore Mine in the Pilbara, Western Australia<br />
A. Dodman, G. Beale and J. Rodriguez Casanova; Schlumberger<br />
Water Services, Perth, WA, Australia<br />
Iron Ore mining operations in the Pilbara region of Western Australia are currently<br />
undergoing unprecedented growth. Expansion of active open-cut mines<br />
and development of new deposits below the pre-mining water table, present significant<br />
challenges in terms of general mine dewatering and pit slope depressurisation.<br />
This paper presents a case study of a staged hydrogeological study for a<br />
large high wall at an active iron ore mine in the Pilbara. The bulk stratigraphy is<br />
structurally complex, defined by alternating banded iron formation (BIF) and<br />
shale macro-band sequences, with a saturated low permeability footwall shale<br />
and potential hydraulic connectivity between the local ore body groundwater<br />
system and a regional dolomite aquifer. Installed vibrating wire piezometers<br />
(VWPs) show a strong response to pumping within the mineralised BIF. In contrast,<br />
high pore pressures prevail within the deep shale units. The study demonstrates<br />
the importance of integration between hydrogeological and geotechnical<br />
programs to provide adequate planning for the design and implementation of<br />
dewatering and slope depressurisation systems, and presents key learning outcomes<br />
for similar environments.<br />
2:45 PM<br />
Measurement of Inflow to Underground Mines for Water Balance<br />
and Operational Mine Water Management<br />
L. Cope; SRK Consulting Inc., Fort Collins, CO<br />
Integral to developing a mine water balance is the need to accurately measure the<br />
variety of flows that can occur in an underground operation. Groundwater inflow<br />
to an underground mine can be complex, and if not done carefully, can result<br />
in overestimates of flow by redundant measurements or under estimates by<br />
missing flow. Further, a flow measurement system, if not carefully conceived can<br />
fail to provide the information that can drive decisions about mixing or segregating<br />
water for discharge, treatment, or process makeup. With clear objectives to<br />
quantifying specific areas of inflow and the locations of mixed and un-mixed waters,<br />
an investigator can identify sources of water using water chemistry and precipitation<br />
pulses. With care, inflows can be identified as sourced by rapid<br />
recharge from the surface, or by inflows from mineralized, mining impacted, and<br />
un-mineralized volumes of rock. The paper presents lessons learned about the<br />
relative strengths and weaknesses of a variety of measurement methods, and describes<br />
design and installation techniques that can maximize value of the data<br />
collected. Data are presented that illustrate effective measurement techniques.<br />
3:05 PM<br />
Use of High Efficiency Electrical Submersible Pumps for Large<br />
Scale Mine Dewatering<br />
K. Lang 1 and M. Hartmann 2 ; 1 Schlumberger, Denver, CO and<br />
2<br />
Schlumberger, Denver, CO<br />
A case study is presented that highlights the successful use of high efficiency electrical<br />
submersible pumps (ESPs) adapted from the oil and gas industry for a large<br />
scale, open pit mine dewatering operation. In this case, Goldcorps PeÒasquito<br />
Mine, PeÒasco and Chile Colorado open pit developments in Zacatecas, Mexico.<br />
Specific advantages associated with the use of ESPs for mine dewatering operations<br />
are provided. At the time of publication there were 18 vertical bedrock dewatering<br />
wells producing an average flow rate of 350 liters per second (lps) at the<br />
PeÒasco and Chile Colorado open pit developments. Average pumping rate per<br />
well was 18 lps, with a maximum of 44 lps. The depth of wells varies from 330 to<br />
800 meters, and includes both in-pit and ex-pit pumping centers. A network of 50<br />
piezometers, was used to monitor the response of groundwater levels to pumping.<br />
Since dewatering operations were initiated in 2007, groundwater elevations<br />
decreased overall, from approximately 1950 meters above sea level (masl) to<br />
around 1625 masl, for a total of 340 meters of drawdown. The pit floor elevation<br />
was approximately 1655 masl.<br />
3:25 PM<br />
Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC) How Will It Affect the<br />
Phosphate Industry in Florida?<br />
S. Bandy; Mosaic, Lithia, FL<br />
In December 2010, as a part of the consent decree, EPA published its rule for numeric<br />
nutrient standards for lakes, flowing waters, and springs within Florida.<br />
The rule was immediately challenged by various entities including the State of<br />
Florida. On June 13, 2012, FDEP submitted the State NNC rule as an alternative<br />
and requested EPA to adopt it in place of the federal rule. EPA, in its initial response,<br />
recognized that states have the primary role in establishing/implementing<br />
water quality standards, and indicated that EPA is prepared to withdraw the<br />
federal inland standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, the state approach.<br />
Numeric nutrient standards will have profound impact on Floridas phosphate industry.<br />
This paper provides a brief history of the rule making, highlights the complexities<br />
due to numerous legal challenges against the EPA rule, and illustrates<br />
the state approach for implementing numeric standards. The paper also addresses<br />
the challenges likely to be faced by the industry to maintain compliance with the<br />
NNC requirements, and discusses available strategies for existing NPDES outfalls,<br />
as well as potential challenges associated with permitting new outfalls.<br />
chair:<br />
Mining & exploration:<br />
Management: construction/Startup<br />
Project Management<br />
2:00 PM • Wednesday, February 27<br />
2:00 PM<br />
Introductions<br />
J. Robertson, Hatch, Scottsdale, AZ<br />
2:05 PM<br />
NIMBYs and the Politics of the Permitting Process<br />
D. Copeland; Calvert Street Group, Nashville, TN<br />
When seeking a new mining permit, the Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) crowd<br />
can derail the best-laid plans. Managing local politics can help secure necessary<br />
permits. This presentation is designed to highlight real-world community and public<br />
relations techniques to overcome permitting challenges. We will focus on opportunities<br />
applicable to landowners, companies, developers, and operators of any<br />
size. Mining companies have a good story to tell, yet they can be vilified during the<br />
permitting process. They provide resources, create jobs, and drive the local economy.<br />
Yet there will always be vocal critics. How can effective public relations, outreach,<br />
and education overcome negative attitudes and minimize opposition?<br />
Tactics will be based around the following: pre-empting negative information;<br />
sharing positive information and education; handling angry constituents; managing<br />
elected officials; dealing with the press; strategic sponsorships and events; and<br />
utilizing the resources around you. We will include real-world case studies of best<br />
(and worst) practices. We will close with time for Q&A and encourage attendees<br />
to discuss real-world examples of how to apply our tactics.<br />
2:25 PM<br />
The Role of the Project Management Professional<br />
During Project Start-up<br />
J. Anderson; Rider Levett Bucknall, Phoenix, AZ<br />
A construction project can rarely conclude successfully if the start-up is poorly<br />
executed. However, there can be a sense that all that is needed to achieve construction<br />
start-up is to simply issue the construction team with a Notice to<br />
Proceed. Most industry professionals understand from either their own experience<br />
or from that of their industry friends that this is nowhere near the whole<br />
story. From the perspective of a construction management professional, lessons<br />
learned from starting up complex vertical construction projects apply very well to<br />
other project types and can be used to avoid undesirable outcomes. This presentation<br />
will highlight some lessons learned and describe a systematic, project management<br />
based, approach to delivering on five key points in construction start-up,<br />
namely (1) defining the key objectives, (2) communication with the construction<br />
team, (3) client reporting (4) implementing QA/QC procedures and (5) budget<br />
and schedule management.<br />
2:45 PM<br />
Construction Completion and Startup<br />
T. Erhart; Hatch, Scottsdale, AZ<br />
This presentation will cover the importance of the Construction Management<br />
team members in the early stages of the project, and how to effectively plan a<br />
project from the beginning throughout the completion and start-up of the facility.<br />
The presentation will go into the detail of how the Construction Management<br />
personnel will: Work with Commissioning in the Pre-Feasibility Phase of the<br />
project to ensure the initial construction sequencing is aligned with the commissioning<br />
of the facilities; Be involved with the project from the beginning of the<br />
Feasibility Phase to conduct site visits, prepare construction execution plans and<br />
provide input to the project team regarding site conditions; Work with<br />
Engineering to define the Construction Work Package boundaries which are the<br />
This is the Technical <strong>Program</strong> as of September 1, 2012. IT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.<br />
117<br />
Please see the Onsite <strong>Program</strong> for final details.