11.07.2014 Views

Annual Meeting Preliminary Program - Full Brochure (PDF) - SME

Annual Meeting Preliminary Program - Full Brochure (PDF) - SME

Annual Meeting Preliminary Program - Full Brochure (PDF) - SME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TECHNICAL PROGRAM<br />

2:25 PM<br />

Investigation of Pit Slope Depressurisation for an Open Pit Iron<br />

Ore Mine in the Pilbara, Western Australia<br />

A. Dodman, G. Beale and J. Rodriguez Casanova; Schlumberger<br />

Water Services, Perth, WA, Australia<br />

Iron Ore mining operations in the Pilbara region of Western Australia are currently<br />

undergoing unprecedented growth. Expansion of active open-cut mines<br />

and development of new deposits below the pre-mining water table, present significant<br />

challenges in terms of general mine dewatering and pit slope depressurisation.<br />

This paper presents a case study of a staged hydrogeological study for a<br />

large high wall at an active iron ore mine in the Pilbara. The bulk stratigraphy is<br />

structurally complex, defined by alternating banded iron formation (BIF) and<br />

shale macro-band sequences, with a saturated low permeability footwall shale<br />

and potential hydraulic connectivity between the local ore body groundwater<br />

system and a regional dolomite aquifer. Installed vibrating wire piezometers<br />

(VWPs) show a strong response to pumping within the mineralised BIF. In contrast,<br />

high pore pressures prevail within the deep shale units. The study demonstrates<br />

the importance of integration between hydrogeological and geotechnical<br />

programs to provide adequate planning for the design and implementation of<br />

dewatering and slope depressurisation systems, and presents key learning outcomes<br />

for similar environments.<br />

2:45 PM<br />

Measurement of Inflow to Underground Mines for Water Balance<br />

and Operational Mine Water Management<br />

L. Cope; SRK Consulting Inc., Fort Collins, CO<br />

Integral to developing a mine water balance is the need to accurately measure the<br />

variety of flows that can occur in an underground operation. Groundwater inflow<br />

to an underground mine can be complex, and if not done carefully, can result<br />

in overestimates of flow by redundant measurements or under estimates by<br />

missing flow. Further, a flow measurement system, if not carefully conceived can<br />

fail to provide the information that can drive decisions about mixing or segregating<br />

water for discharge, treatment, or process makeup. With clear objectives to<br />

quantifying specific areas of inflow and the locations of mixed and un-mixed waters,<br />

an investigator can identify sources of water using water chemistry and precipitation<br />

pulses. With care, inflows can be identified as sourced by rapid<br />

recharge from the surface, or by inflows from mineralized, mining impacted, and<br />

un-mineralized volumes of rock. The paper presents lessons learned about the<br />

relative strengths and weaknesses of a variety of measurement methods, and describes<br />

design and installation techniques that can maximize value of the data<br />

collected. Data are presented that illustrate effective measurement techniques.<br />

3:05 PM<br />

Use of High Efficiency Electrical Submersible Pumps for Large<br />

Scale Mine Dewatering<br />

K. Lang 1 and M. Hartmann 2 ; 1 Schlumberger, Denver, CO and<br />

2<br />

Schlumberger, Denver, CO<br />

A case study is presented that highlights the successful use of high efficiency electrical<br />

submersible pumps (ESPs) adapted from the oil and gas industry for a large<br />

scale, open pit mine dewatering operation. In this case, Goldcorps PeÒasquito<br />

Mine, PeÒasco and Chile Colorado open pit developments in Zacatecas, Mexico.<br />

Specific advantages associated with the use of ESPs for mine dewatering operations<br />

are provided. At the time of publication there were 18 vertical bedrock dewatering<br />

wells producing an average flow rate of 350 liters per second (lps) at the<br />

PeÒasco and Chile Colorado open pit developments. Average pumping rate per<br />

well was 18 lps, with a maximum of 44 lps. The depth of wells varies from 330 to<br />

800 meters, and includes both in-pit and ex-pit pumping centers. A network of 50<br />

piezometers, was used to monitor the response of groundwater levels to pumping.<br />

Since dewatering operations were initiated in 2007, groundwater elevations<br />

decreased overall, from approximately 1950 meters above sea level (masl) to<br />

around 1625 masl, for a total of 340 meters of drawdown. The pit floor elevation<br />

was approximately 1655 masl.<br />

3:25 PM<br />

Numeric Nutrient Criteria (NNC) How Will It Affect the<br />

Phosphate Industry in Florida?<br />

S. Bandy; Mosaic, Lithia, FL<br />

In December 2010, as a part of the consent decree, EPA published its rule for numeric<br />

nutrient standards for lakes, flowing waters, and springs within Florida.<br />

The rule was immediately challenged by various entities including the State of<br />

Florida. On June 13, 2012, FDEP submitted the State NNC rule as an alternative<br />

and requested EPA to adopt it in place of the federal rule. EPA, in its initial response,<br />

recognized that states have the primary role in establishing/implementing<br />

water quality standards, and indicated that EPA is prepared to withdraw the<br />

federal inland standards if FDEP adopts, and EPA approves, the state approach.<br />

Numeric nutrient standards will have profound impact on Floridas phosphate industry.<br />

This paper provides a brief history of the rule making, highlights the complexities<br />

due to numerous legal challenges against the EPA rule, and illustrates<br />

the state approach for implementing numeric standards. The paper also addresses<br />

the challenges likely to be faced by the industry to maintain compliance with the<br />

NNC requirements, and discusses available strategies for existing NPDES outfalls,<br />

as well as potential challenges associated with permitting new outfalls.<br />

chair:<br />

Mining & exploration:<br />

Management: construction/Startup<br />

Project Management<br />

2:00 PM • Wednesday, February 27<br />

2:00 PM<br />

Introductions<br />

J. Robertson, Hatch, Scottsdale, AZ<br />

2:05 PM<br />

NIMBYs and the Politics of the Permitting Process<br />

D. Copeland; Calvert Street Group, Nashville, TN<br />

When seeking a new mining permit, the Not In My Back Yard (NIMBY) crowd<br />

can derail the best-laid plans. Managing local politics can help secure necessary<br />

permits. This presentation is designed to highlight real-world community and public<br />

relations techniques to overcome permitting challenges. We will focus on opportunities<br />

applicable to landowners, companies, developers, and operators of any<br />

size. Mining companies have a good story to tell, yet they can be vilified during the<br />

permitting process. They provide resources, create jobs, and drive the local economy.<br />

Yet there will always be vocal critics. How can effective public relations, outreach,<br />

and education overcome negative attitudes and minimize opposition?<br />

Tactics will be based around the following: pre-empting negative information;<br />

sharing positive information and education; handling angry constituents; managing<br />

elected officials; dealing with the press; strategic sponsorships and events; and<br />

utilizing the resources around you. We will include real-world case studies of best<br />

(and worst) practices. We will close with time for Q&A and encourage attendees<br />

to discuss real-world examples of how to apply our tactics.<br />

2:25 PM<br />

The Role of the Project Management Professional<br />

During Project Start-up<br />

J. Anderson; Rider Levett Bucknall, Phoenix, AZ<br />

A construction project can rarely conclude successfully if the start-up is poorly<br />

executed. However, there can be a sense that all that is needed to achieve construction<br />

start-up is to simply issue the construction team with a Notice to<br />

Proceed. Most industry professionals understand from either their own experience<br />

or from that of their industry friends that this is nowhere near the whole<br />

story. From the perspective of a construction management professional, lessons<br />

learned from starting up complex vertical construction projects apply very well to<br />

other project types and can be used to avoid undesirable outcomes. This presentation<br />

will highlight some lessons learned and describe a systematic, project management<br />

based, approach to delivering on five key points in construction start-up,<br />

namely (1) defining the key objectives, (2) communication with the construction<br />

team, (3) client reporting (4) implementing QA/QC procedures and (5) budget<br />

and schedule management.<br />

2:45 PM<br />

Construction Completion and Startup<br />

T. Erhart; Hatch, Scottsdale, AZ<br />

This presentation will cover the importance of the Construction Management<br />

team members in the early stages of the project, and how to effectively plan a<br />

project from the beginning throughout the completion and start-up of the facility.<br />

The presentation will go into the detail of how the Construction Management<br />

personnel will: Work with Commissioning in the Pre-Feasibility Phase of the<br />

project to ensure the initial construction sequencing is aligned with the commissioning<br />

of the facilities; Be involved with the project from the beginning of the<br />

Feasibility Phase to conduct site visits, prepare construction execution plans and<br />

provide input to the project team regarding site conditions; Work with<br />

Engineering to define the Construction Work Package boundaries which are the<br />

This is the Technical <strong>Program</strong> as of September 1, 2012. IT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.<br />

117<br />

Please see the Onsite <strong>Program</strong> for final details.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!