11.07.2014 Views

Annual Meeting Preliminary Program - Full Brochure (PDF) - SME

Annual Meeting Preliminary Program - Full Brochure (PDF) - SME

Annual Meeting Preliminary Program - Full Brochure (PDF) - SME

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

TECHNICAL PROGRAM<br />

causes are decision errors of omission or commission. Stopping here is often<br />

called witch hunting and is counterproductive to effective RCA as well as overall<br />

operational reliability. I will discuss the TRUE causes of failures. The Latent<br />

Root Causes and the rationale for the decisions we make.<br />

2:45 PM<br />

An Analysis of Recent MSHA Accident Data for Underground<br />

Metal Mines Using Backfill<br />

J. Seymour, L. Martin, C. Clark, D. Tesarik and M. Stepan; OMSHR,<br />

NIOSH, Spokane, WA<br />

This paper provides an overview of the current use of backfill for ground support<br />

in underground metal mines in the United States and a summary of recent accident<br />

data reported for these mines by the Mine Safety and Health Administration<br />

(MSHA). Backfill mines comprise a major part of the underground metal mining<br />

industry and are particularly important in terms of the fatalities and injuries impacting<br />

this workforce. MSHA reported several different types of accidents involving<br />

backfill at these mines. These backfill-related accidents accounted for 63<br />

percent of the fatalities. Ground falls were the single leading cause of fatal accidents<br />

accounting for 50 percent of the fatalities. While backfill ground falls do<br />

not occur frequently, these accidents result in a much higher proportion of fatalities<br />

than host rock ground falls. Backfill ground fall accidents are especially hazardous<br />

in underhand cut-and-fill mining operations where employees are working<br />

directly beneath the backfill. MSHA accident data indicates that further<br />

cooperative research with the mining industry is needed to identify and address<br />

ground fall problems in underground metal mines using backfill.<br />

3:05 PM<br />

Managing Blasting Service Risk In Order to Reduce Blasting<br />

Service Liability<br />

B. Fidler and D. Lilly; Indsutry Sales Support, Dyno Nobel,<br />

Salt Lake City, UT<br />

A sound framework of risk oversight, risk management and internal control is<br />

fundamental to good corporate governance of a mining or quarry operation. A<br />

solid risk management program underpins reliable customer service for a blasting<br />

service, regulatory compliance with relevant laws and regulations for effective<br />

and efficient operations, and fragmented material to ensure mining efficiencies.<br />

A risk evaluation or profile needs to be conducted for each new customer or<br />

new blasting project based on a Risk Evaluation Tool in order to accurately and<br />

subjectively understand the actual risks prior to obtaining/starting the work.<br />

Risk is the possibility that an event will occur and adversely affect the achievement<br />

of objectives. Risk Assessing/Evaluation Tool would be used at all levels<br />

of drill or blast work utilizing multiple risk ratings. Developing a risk evaluation<br />

tool to help ensure the job, project or customer contract bid is performed which<br />

reviews and understands the possible liability associated with providing sufficient<br />

blasting service.<br />

3:25 PM<br />

RISKGATE – A Case Study of Effectively Sharing Risk Controls in<br />

Australian Coal Operations<br />

P. Kirsch 1 , J. Harris 1 , S. Goater 1 , D. Sprott 2 , J. Joy 3 and D. Cliff 1 ;<br />

1<br />

MISHC, University of Queensland, St. Lucia, QLD, Australia; 2<br />

Design Solutions Pty Ltd, Buddina, QLD, Australia and 3 JK Tech Pty<br />

Ltd, Indooroopilly, QLD, Australia<br />

The Australian Coal Association Research <strong>Program</strong> (ACARP) is funded by a<br />

levy on all Australian black coal producers. RISKGATE is the largest single<br />

ACARP occupational health and safety (OHS) initiative to date. RISKGATE is<br />

an interactive online risk management system developed by the Minerals<br />

Industry Safety and Health Centre (MISHC; University of Queensland) to assist<br />

the mining industry in implementing continual improvement in management of<br />

major unwanted events so maximising health and safety performance. All major<br />

Australian mining companies are contributing topic experts to this broad industry<br />

initiative. RISKGATE generates substantive and leading edge controls to assist<br />

industry stakeholders in the design, management and reporting of organisational<br />

and regulatory compliance requirements. From a broader industry<br />

perspective, RISKGATE provides an environment for knowledge capture and<br />

knowledge exchange to drive innovation and best practice in the identification,<br />

assessment and management of risk. By capturing operational knowledge from<br />

industry experts, RISKGATE provides a cumulative corporate memory at a time<br />

of high personnel turnover in the coal industry.<br />

3:45 PM<br />

Using Bowtie Diagrams for Analysing and Assessing the Risk of<br />

Major Hazards in the Mining Industry<br />

G. Lyle 1 , P. Foster 2 , V. Pakalnis 1 and D. Millar 1 ; 1 MIRARCO,<br />

Sudbury, ON, Canada and 2 University of Exeter, Cornwall,<br />

United Kingdom<br />

Where risk assessment has been used in the mining industry there has been little<br />

consideration between “major” hazards (high consequence-low likelihood risks<br />

such as explosions, fires, and major falls of ground) and “occupational” hazards<br />

(lower consequence-higher likelihood risks). These different types of hazards are<br />

assessed together using a single risk assessment process. This paper will argue<br />

against this, stating that these types of hazard should be managed separately<br />

using different risk assessment techniques and advocating Bowtie analysis as a<br />

technique when looking at major hazards. A Bowtie diagram is a graphical<br />

means of assessment that focuses on identifying all the specific causes and consequences<br />

of major events, from which all the pre-event and post-event control<br />

measures can be identified. From this critical control measures can be identified<br />

and monitoring/assurance systems can be established. It is this assessment of<br />

control measures and their effectiveness that replaces the more traditional evaluation<br />

of risk. This paper will use examples of real Bowtie assessments and look at<br />

some of the techniques used for assessing control effectiveness.<br />

chair:<br />

Mining & exploration:<br />

technology: how Software technology<br />

Makes My Job easier<br />

2:00 PM • Tuesday, February 26<br />

2:00 PM<br />

Introductions<br />

A. Garcia, Maptek, Lakewood, CO<br />

2:05 PM<br />

Real Time Monitoring Techniques for Haul Fleet<br />

Reliabiltiy Improvement<br />

D. Fisk; Mining Solutions, Honeywell Advanced Solutions, Toronto,<br />

ON, Canada<br />

Numerous mines have implemented real time tools to monitor the health of their<br />

hauling andloading fleets with significant successes. We will look at the workflows,<br />

methodologies and results from a North American mine who have been<br />

using real time health monitoring on their fleet for a number of years. The impact<br />

on reliability and cost will be reviewed<br />

2:25 PM<br />

Geotechnical Data Collection and Analysis<br />

Z. Hladysz 1 , S. Otto 1 , K. Hachmeister 1 , C. Randolph-Loar 2 and<br />

S. Schiele 3 ; 1 Golder Associates, Lakewood, CO; 2 Lachel and<br />

Associates, Golden, CO and 3 Maptek, Lakewood, CO<br />

Recent hardware and software developments in the acquisition and processing of<br />

geotechnical data allow the engineer to perform geotechnical assessments with a<br />

new level of efficiency and accuracy. This provides an important edge as the increasingly<br />

competitive market for mineral resources demands corresponding increases<br />

in productivity without jeopardizing mine safety. This paper presents the<br />

authors experience with the digital mapping technology used for geotechnical assessment<br />

of the rock mass at the former Homestake Mine as a site of Sanford<br />

Underground Research Facility. The results of the geotechnical investigations,<br />

which involved laser scanners and I-Site Studio software, were used for excavation<br />

design. Significant advantages of this technology were fast and safe data acquisition,<br />

efficient processing, and cost-effective and accurate geotechnical analysis.<br />

2:45 PM<br />

New Trends in Energy Management Systems and Its Benefits for<br />

Mining Applications<br />

R. Kaushik and F. Mielli; Schneider Electric, Alpharetta, GA<br />

Key performance indicators and advanced analytics help mining operations manage<br />

energy in financial terms and gain unique insight into the impacts of power<br />

quality on their business and all energy assets. Stakeholders from management to<br />

plant level are able to be empowered by actionable energy intelligence to reveal<br />

This is the Technical <strong>Program</strong> as of September 1, 2012. IT IS SUBJECT TO CHANGE.<br />

91<br />

Please see the Onsite <strong>Program</strong> for final details.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!