25.07.2014 Views

NOAA Protocols for Fisheries Acoustics Surveys and Related ...

NOAA Protocols for Fisheries Acoustics Surveys and Related ...

NOAA Protocols for Fisheries Acoustics Surveys and Related ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

transmitted signal, however. The NWFSC does not apply a post-processing correction <strong>for</strong><br />

signal attenuation due to bubbles.<br />

Transducer Motion – As with bubble attenuation, transducer motion is associated with vessel<br />

motion, placement of the transducer, <strong>and</strong> sea state, thus many of the same considerations <strong>and</strong><br />

remediation methods apply. “Dropouts” on an echogram are a typical manifestation of<br />

transducer motion. As with bubble attenuation, if transducer motions become excessive, vessel<br />

speed or suspension of operations may be considered to preserve the quality of the data (see<br />

Protocol 4, Sampling).<br />

Bio-fouling – Bio-fouling refers to biological growth (e.g. barnacles) on the face of the<br />

transducers. The effects of biofouling can be identified by unusual calibration results or<br />

system per<strong>for</strong>mance measures (see Protocol 1, Calibration <strong>and</strong> System Per<strong>for</strong>mance).<br />

Transducer faces should be inspected <strong>and</strong> cleaned if necessary be<strong>for</strong>e the beginning of a survey<br />

or field season.<br />

Error<br />

Noise, bubble attenuation, excessive transducer motion, <strong>and</strong> biofouling will degrade system<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>and</strong> lower the signal to noise ratio of the data <strong>and</strong> any resulting biomass estimates.<br />

Considerations<br />

Remediation – If possible, the above sources of reduced per<strong>for</strong>mance should be avoided by<br />

proper planning <strong>and</strong> setup, troubleshooting <strong>and</strong> elimination of noise problems encountered<br />

during the survey, or post-cruise processing to remove or otherwise account <strong>for</strong> the problem, as<br />

described in each section above. The error resulting from issues that reduce sounder<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance should be well understood.<br />

Improvements – If applicable, motion sensor data may be used to correct acoustic<br />

measurements.<br />

Data Management<br />

Acoustic Data<br />

Raw data files <strong>and</strong> .ev files are logged, written to an external hard drive, <strong>and</strong> live viewed with<br />

Echoview software. File size is limited to 10 MB to facilitate file h<strong>and</strong>ling <strong>and</strong> data transfer.<br />

Raw data files are copied to a second external hard drive at the end of each transect or at the end<br />

of a day’s operation to ensure that two shipboard copies of the raw data exist. This copy of the<br />

raw data is judged with Echoview <strong>and</strong> saved on both external hard drives. Raw data, .ev files,<br />

<strong>and</strong> judged data are burned to a DVD when enough data to fill the DVD (approximately 4.75<br />

GB) have been accumulated. A total of three copies of the data are thus created.<br />

Upon completion of the survey all data are uploaded to a server in the Seattle FRAM facility.<br />

Duplicate DVD copies are archived to the Newport FRAM <strong>and</strong> Nanaimo DFO facilities such<br />

that, overall, raw data from the survey reside in three separate physical locations.<br />

117

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!