25.07.2014 Views

NOAA Protocols for Fisheries Acoustics Surveys and Related ...

NOAA Protocols for Fisheries Acoustics Surveys and Related ...

NOAA Protocols for Fisheries Acoustics Surveys and Related ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Techniques<br />

Be<strong>for</strong>e conducting a calibration important issues to consider are:<br />

1) The calibration should be conducted in the same environmental conditions (water<br />

temperature <strong>and</strong> salinity) as are experienced during the survey.<br />

2) Water depths must be sufficient to exceed near-field limitations <strong>and</strong>/or system limitations<br />

<strong>for</strong> the echo sounder frequencies to be calibrated (Table 1).<br />

3) Calibrations must be conducted be<strong>for</strong>e the survey begins to establish proper echo sounder<br />

operation, <strong>and</strong> after or near the end of the survey to ensure no significant changes have<br />

occurred. Additional calibrations during the survey are valuable <strong>for</strong> maintaining system<br />

per<strong>for</strong>mance <strong>and</strong> ensuring high-quality data.<br />

4) Calibrations must be conducted with the same pulse durations, transmit powers, <strong>and</strong><br />

b<strong>and</strong>widths used during the survey.<br />

Software<br />

Echo sounder manufacturers provide detailed instructions <strong>and</strong> software programs <strong>for</strong><br />

calibrating their systems. These instructions must be followed to ensure proper calibration <strong>and</strong><br />

system stability. Because software upgrades occur, software version identification (both<br />

calibration software <strong>and</strong> echo sounder software) should be documented.<br />

St<strong>and</strong>ard values<br />

Table 1 provides a list of common st<strong>and</strong>ard values <strong>for</strong> calibration. The calibration sphere<br />

target strength is dependent on the water temperature <strong>and</strong> salinity (i.e., sound speed dependent).<br />

The copper spheres specified <strong>for</strong> each frequency have been shown to be “optimal” in that the<br />

target strengths of the specified spheres vary minimally <strong>for</strong> a normal range of temperatures <strong>and</strong><br />

salinities (Foote, 1982; 1983a). However, one should confirm that the theoretical TS is valid <strong>for</strong><br />

the measured environmental conditions.<br />

.<br />

Frequency [kHz]<br />

Calibration<br />

Sphere<br />

EK500 Minimum<br />

Target Range [m]<br />

Nominal<br />

TS [dB]*<br />

12 45 mm Cu 35 -40.4<br />

18 64 mm Cu 22 -34.4<br />

38 60 mm Cu 10 -33.6<br />

38 38.1 mm WC 10 -42.2<br />

120 23 mm Cu 10 -40.4<br />

120 38.1 mm WC 10 -39.6<br />

200 13.7 mm Cu 10 -45.0<br />

200 38.1 mm WC 10 -39.5<br />

Table 1. Calibration st<strong>and</strong>ard values.<br />

Calibration sphere measurements are the sphere diameter. ‘Cu’ denotes a copper calibration<br />

sphere, <strong>and</strong> ‘WC’ denotes a tungsten carbide with 6% cobalt binder calibration sphere. The<br />

‘EK500 Minimum Target Range’ applies to the SIMRAD EK500 <strong>and</strong> was derived as a<br />

combination of the far field of the transducer <strong>and</strong> electronic limitations of the echo sounder<br />

14

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!