Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...
Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...
Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> and Demographic Research<br />
Table 4-11<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> Emergency Management Agency Grants:<br />
States' Per Capita Expenditures as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> the National Per Capita Expenditure<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> Fiscal Years 1996 <strong>to</strong> 2009<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> FY 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
U.S. Per Cap. Exp. $ 5.24 $ 18.62 $ 5.49 $ 6.85 $ 7.01 $ 8.58 $ 11.09 - - - - - - -<br />
Alabama 231% 55% 175% 210% 184% 132% 54% - - - - - - -<br />
Alaska 366% 157% 284% 94% 130% 69% 92% - - - - - - -<br />
Arizona 29% 44% 75% 35% 46% 13% 23% - - - - - - -<br />
Arkansas 96% 79% 59% 91% 40% 759% 70% - - - - - - -<br />
California 261% 339% 138% 241% 220% 168% 140% - - - - - - -<br />
Colorado 27% 24% 32% 30% 38% 38% 41% - - - - - - -<br />
Connecticut 10% 21% 13% 14% 16% 8% 8% - - - - - - -<br />
Delaware 123% 3% 106% 60% 72% 60% 30% - - - - - - -<br />
<strong>Florida</strong> 182% 37% 162% 163% 187% 112% 96%<br />
Refer <strong>to</strong> Homeland Security<br />
Georgia 108% 198% 181% 103% 123% 47% 32% - - - - - - -<br />
Hawaii 322% 116% 266% 61% 53% 82% 31% - - - - - - -<br />
Idaho 186% 205% 195% 60% 53% 32% 20% - - - - - - -<br />
Illinois 51% 52% 58% 53% 29% 27% 11% - - - - - - -<br />
Indiana 30% 22% 49% 45% 11% 18% 14% - - - - - - -<br />
Iowa 106% 36% 110% 107% 119% 57% 45% - - - - - - -<br />
Kansas 73% 8% 68% 112% 54% 48% 146% - - - - - - -<br />
Kentucky 81% 180% 199% 53% 59% 39% 46% - - - - - - -<br />
Louisiana 97% 22% 69% 130% 60% 157% 44% - - - - - - -<br />
Maine 54% 61% 449% 226% 111% 67% 34% - - - - - - -<br />
Maryland 81% 9% 26% 16% 29% 37% 16% - - - - - - -<br />
Massachusetts 60% 47% 39% 27% 29% 34% 27% - - - - - - -<br />
Michigan 11% 19% 72% 39% 21% 82% 7% - - - - - - -<br />
Minnesota 36% 336% 520% 219% 133% 109% 77% - - - - - - -<br />
Mississippi 40% 12% 26% 151% 95% 126% 71% - - - - - - -<br />
Missouri 97% 16% 41% 42% 30% 16% 96% - - - - - - -<br />
Montana 70% 29% 121% 32% 291% 200% 199% - - - - - - -<br />
Nebraska 151% -57% 354% 117% 65% 50% 32% - - - - - - -<br />
Nevada 20% 132% 47% 39% 32% 16% 8% - - - - - - -<br />
New Hampshire 42% 40% 103% 119% 44% 50% 33% - - - - - - -<br />
New Jersey 75% 18% 12% 9% 74% 41% 86% - - - - - - -<br />
New Mexico 33% 13% 29% 21% 45% 52% 26% - - - - - - -<br />
New York 46% 42% 56% 50% 55% 124% 580% - - - - - - -<br />
North Carolina 65% 298% 120% 137% 509% 341% 133% - - - - - - -<br />
North Dakota 355% 2415% 2088% 2001% 1536% 1236% 532% - - - - - - -<br />
Ohio 22% 47% 43% 32% 19% 14% 9% - - - - - - -<br />
Oklahoma 42% 7% 20% 188% 66% 468% 315% - - - - - - -<br />
Oregon 157% 97% 133% 90% 79% 48% 37% - - - - - - -<br />
Pennsylvania 124% 17% 37% 20% 37% 19% 12% - - - - - - -<br />
Rhode Island 77% 23% 20% 6% 29% 37% 16% - - - - - - -<br />
South Carolina 57% 24% 26% 23% 111% 38% 16% - - - - - - -<br />
South Dakota 426% 757% 454% 250% 123% 162% 85% - - - - - - -<br />
Tennessee 22% 21% 83% 103% 82% 35% 28% - - - - - - -<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Funding</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Florida</strong> in Fiscal Year 2009 Page 88