29.08.2014 Views

Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...

Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...

Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> and Demographic Research<br />

Table 4-11<br />

<strong>Federal</strong> Emergency Management Agency Grants:<br />

States' Per Capita Expenditures as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> the National Per Capita Expenditure<br />

<strong>Federal</strong> Fiscal Years 1996 <strong>to</strong> 2009<br />

<strong>Federal</strong> FY 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />

U.S. Per Cap. Exp. $ 5.24 $ 18.62 $ 5.49 $ 6.85 $ 7.01 $ 8.58 $ 11.09 - - - - - - -<br />

Alabama 231% 55% 175% 210% 184% 132% 54% - - - - - - -<br />

Alaska 366% 157% 284% 94% 130% 69% 92% - - - - - - -<br />

Arizona 29% 44% 75% 35% 46% 13% 23% - - - - - - -<br />

Arkansas 96% 79% 59% 91% 40% 759% 70% - - - - - - -<br />

California 261% 339% 138% 241% 220% 168% 140% - - - - - - -<br />

Colorado 27% 24% 32% 30% 38% 38% 41% - - - - - - -<br />

Connecticut 10% 21% 13% 14% 16% 8% 8% - - - - - - -<br />

Delaware 123% 3% 106% 60% 72% 60% 30% - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>Florida</strong> 182% 37% 162% 163% 187% 112% 96%<br />

Refer <strong>to</strong> Homeland Security<br />

Georgia 108% 198% 181% 103% 123% 47% 32% - - - - - - -<br />

Hawaii 322% 116% 266% 61% 53% 82% 31% - - - - - - -<br />

Idaho 186% 205% 195% 60% 53% 32% 20% - - - - - - -<br />

Illinois 51% 52% 58% 53% 29% 27% 11% - - - - - - -<br />

Indiana 30% 22% 49% 45% 11% 18% 14% - - - - - - -<br />

Iowa 106% 36% 110% 107% 119% 57% 45% - - - - - - -<br />

Kansas 73% 8% 68% 112% 54% 48% 146% - - - - - - -<br />

Kentucky 81% 180% 199% 53% 59% 39% 46% - - - - - - -<br />

Louisiana 97% 22% 69% 130% 60% 157% 44% - - - - - - -<br />

Maine 54% 61% 449% 226% 111% 67% 34% - - - - - - -<br />

Maryland 81% 9% 26% 16% 29% 37% 16% - - - - - - -<br />

Massachusetts 60% 47% 39% 27% 29% 34% 27% - - - - - - -<br />

Michigan 11% 19% 72% 39% 21% 82% 7% - - - - - - -<br />

Minnesota 36% 336% 520% 219% 133% 109% 77% - - - - - - -<br />

Mississippi 40% 12% 26% 151% 95% 126% 71% - - - - - - -<br />

Missouri 97% 16% 41% 42% 30% 16% 96% - - - - - - -<br />

Montana 70% 29% 121% 32% 291% 200% 199% - - - - - - -<br />

Nebraska 151% -57% 354% 117% 65% 50% 32% - - - - - - -<br />

Nevada 20% 132% 47% 39% 32% 16% 8% - - - - - - -<br />

New Hampshire 42% 40% 103% 119% 44% 50% 33% - - - - - - -<br />

New Jersey 75% 18% 12% 9% 74% 41% 86% - - - - - - -<br />

New Mexico 33% 13% 29% 21% 45% 52% 26% - - - - - - -<br />

New York 46% 42% 56% 50% 55% 124% 580% - - - - - - -<br />

North Carolina 65% 298% 120% 137% 509% 341% 133% - - - - - - -<br />

North Dakota 355% 2415% 2088% 2001% 1536% 1236% 532% - - - - - - -<br />

Ohio 22% 47% 43% 32% 19% 14% 9% - - - - - - -<br />

Oklahoma 42% 7% 20% 188% 66% 468% 315% - - - - - - -<br />

Oregon 157% 97% 133% 90% 79% 48% 37% - - - - - - -<br />

Pennsylvania 124% 17% 37% 20% 37% 19% 12% - - - - - - -<br />

Rhode Island 77% 23% 20% 6% 29% 37% 16% - - - - - - -<br />

South Carolina 57% 24% 26% 23% 111% 38% 16% - - - - - - -<br />

South Dakota 426% 757% 454% 250% 123% 162% 85% - - - - - - -<br />

Tennessee 22% 21% 83% 103% 82% 35% 28% - - - - - - -<br />

<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Federal</strong> <strong>Funding</strong> <strong>to</strong> <strong>Florida</strong> in Fiscal Year 2009 Page 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!