Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...
Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...
Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> and Demographic Research<br />
Table 4-13<br />
U.S. Department <strong>of</strong> Homeland Security Grants:<br />
States' Per Capita Expenditures as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> the National Per Capita Expenditure<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> Fiscal Years 1996 <strong>to</strong> 2009<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> FY 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
U.S. Per Cap. Exp. - - - - - - - $ 15.17 $ 17.89 $ 26.36 $ 31.68 $ 17.70 $ 37.57 $ 56.44<br />
Alabama - - - - - - - 76% 103% 249% 129% 99% 83% 76%<br />
Alaska - - - - - - - 54% 259% 161% 187% 221% 243% 206%<br />
Arizona - - - - - - - 13% 60% 32% 19% 23% 55% 60%<br />
Arkansas - - - - - - - 88% 155% 90% 85% 50% 109% 172%<br />
California - - - - - - - 99% 145% 78% 50% 55% 77% 70%<br />
Colorado - - - - - - - 23% 70% 100% 27% 38% 64% 67%<br />
Connecticut - - - - - - - 19% 91% 37% 27% 32% 63% 57%<br />
Delaware - - - - - - - 33% 190% 92% 174% 80% 154% 143%<br />
<strong>Florida</strong> Refer <strong>to</strong> <strong>Federal</strong> Emergency Management Agency<br />
65% 87% 344% 289% 191% 127% 87%<br />
Georgia - - - - - - - 19% 59% 42% 23% 31% 56% 47%<br />
Hawaii - - - - - - - 22% 114% 95% 38% 32% 155% 134%<br />
Idaho - - - - - - - 12% 103% 56% 31% 33% 95% 93%<br />
Illinois - - - - - - - 0% 56% 38% 28% 32% 63% 71%<br />
Indiana - - - - - - - 16% 69% 52% 18% 28% 53% 83%<br />
Iowa - - - - - - - 28% 87% 56% 23% 74% 125% 229%<br />
Kansas - - - - - - - 36% 89% 94% 620% 600% 372% 180%<br />
Kentucky - - - - - - - 55% 125% 60% 35% 41% 70% 111%<br />
Louisiana - - - - - - - 227% 114% 333% 1406% 1678% 886% 783%<br />
Maine - - - - - - - 27% 139% 88% 53% 109% 147% 136%<br />
Maryland - - - - - - - 26% 105% 46% 28% 27% 79% 67%<br />
Massachusetts - - - - - - - 28% 101% 74% 34% 23% 61% 73%<br />
Michigan - - - - - - - 8% 57% 31% 24% 26% 53% 54%<br />
Minnesota - - - - - - - 48% 86% 38% 19% 43% 65% 60%<br />
Mississippi - - - - - - - 59% 92% 139% 952% 1031% 407% 281%<br />
Missouri - - - - - - - 43% 90% 40% 34% 142% 104% 99%<br />
Montana - - - - - - - 24% 215% 158% 43% 54% 170% 163%<br />
Nebraska - - - - - - - 28% 116% 76% 57% 254% 191% 128%<br />
Nevada - - - - - - - 8% 107% 72% 410% 25% 80% 85%<br />
New Hampshire - - - - - - - 38% 126% 69% 79% 196% 156% 218%<br />
New Jersey - - - - - - - 30% 89% 33% 21% 22% 68% 64%<br />
New Mexico - - - - - - - 38% 157% 58% 16% 126% 199% 197%<br />
New York - - - - - - - 840% 111% 278% 50% 102% 105% 86%<br />
North Carolina - - - - - - - 92% 117% 59% 35% 38% 45% 43%<br />
North Dakota - - - - - - - 160% 316% 941% 172% 127% 229% 262%<br />
Ohio - - - - - - - 19% 67% 56% 23% 32% 54% 60%<br />
Oklahoma - - - - - - - 65% 97% 61% 48% 146% 174% 134%<br />
Oregon - - - - - - - 57% 121% 76% 38% 53% 87% 84%<br />
Pennsylvania - - - - - - - 13% 67% 60% 25% 44% 55% 53%<br />
Rhode Island - - - - - - - 29% 126% 87% 33% 50% 148% 142%<br />
South Carolina - - - - - - - 17% 80% 39% 29% 24% 61% 56%<br />
South Dakota - - - - - - - 59% 183% 103% 115% 94% 204% 189%<br />
Tennessee - - - - - - - 16% 98% 47% 33% 32% 52% 48%<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Federal</strong> Funds <strong>to</strong> <strong>Florida</strong> in Fiscal Year 2009 Page 92
Change language