Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...

Office of Economic and Demographic Research
Table 4-14
U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development Grants:
States' Per Capita Expenditures as a Percentage of the National Per Capita Expenditure
Federal Fiscal Years 1996 to 2009
Federal FY 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
U.S. Per Cap. Exp. $ 82.35 $ 82.16 $ 95.96 $ 107.55 $ 110.59 $ 111.46 $ 123.44 $ 129.76 $ 132.02 $ 92.04 $ 134.89 $ 154.91 $ 129.59 $ 135.37
Alabama 87% 101% 100% 90% 87% 92% 92% 88% 89% 105% 88% 87% 80% 101%
Alaska 141% 274% 234% 266% 298% 271% 220% 251% 185% 318% 197% 184% 118% 161%
Arizona 66% 77% 68% 63% 59% 72% 73% 69% 63% 64% 56% 43% 53% 55%
Arkansas 94% 78% 73% 69% 72% 71% 71% 74% 81% 73% 66% 63% 59% 81%
California 96% 92% 98% 96% 92% 93% 97% 97% 99% 82% 93% 88% 93% 123%
Colorado 93% 69% 71% 73% 91% 80% 75% 81% 73% 62% 75% 61% 65% 67%
Connecticut 116% 141% 142% 146% 140% 146% 140% 147% 146% 146% 162% 147% 159% 181%
Delaware 73% 95% 100% 100% 101% 109% 104% 99% 103% 108% 99% 88% 84% 94%
Florida 63% 67% 68% 65% 63% 61% 64% 65% 61% 63% 62% 61% 69% 69%
Georgia 95% 87% 83% 90% 94% 81% 84% 81% 78% 82% 90% 78% 80% 91%
Hawaii 120% 129% 138% 123% 132% 105% 93% 112% 100% 100% 108% 93% 91% 120%
Idaho 93% 45% 53% 52% 55% 45% 45% 50% 48% 49% 39% 36% 43% 44%
Illinois 146% 134% 128% 130% 124% 128% 130% 122% 130% 142% 133% 118% 113% 134%
Indiana 68% 65% 69% 70% 73% 73% 71% 71% 72% 69% 70% 61% 57% 70%
Iowa 88% 61% 55% 58% 62% 69% 59% 64% 63% 61% 65% 55% 59% 64%
Kansas 79% 55% 50% 49% 55% 58% 56% 62% 62% 61% 60% 48% 47% 55%
Kentucky 90% 90% 90% 89% 88% 108% 97% 91% 96% 101% 88% 76% 77% 89%
Louisiana 102% 92% 96% 96% 95% 101% 103% 98% 96% 104% 104% 769% 639% 178%
Maine 194% 109% 118% 115% 138% 124% 112% 121% 118% 132% 136% 114% 127% 128%
Maryland 107% 116% 104% 113% 116% 105% 104% 108% 114% 125% 129% 11% 121% 142%
Massachusetts 194% 174% 178% 190% 187% 204% 190% 216% 221% 218% 227% 205% 201% 229%
Michigan 65% 71% 71% 77% 78% 76% 73% 73% 72% 81% 74% 71% 73% 82%
Minnesota 83% 88% 92% 91% 94% 95% 92% 95% 94% 103% 94% 83% 80% 94%
Mississippi 102% 80% 84% 81% 85% 82% 81% 82% 82% 88% 85% 429% 287% 218%
Missouri 109% 88% 79% 80% 80% 98% 84% 97% 94% 79% 78% 71% 67% 77%
Montana 90% 113% 106% 100% 121% 111% 96% 92% 101% 111% 97% 83% 63% 73%
Nebraska 88% 81% 72% 66% 70% 74% 70% 71% 71% 73% 66% 57% 60% 66%
Nevada 89% 83% 70% 62% 65% 63% 70% 64% 58% 53% 57% 51% 50% 61%
New Hampshire 129% 80% 89% 88% 86% 92% 87% 99% 95% 84% 104% 89% 100% 106%
New Jersey 117% 137% 135% 141% 146% 145% 130% 134% 132% 134% 151% 126% 126% 139%
New Mexico 87% 92% 97% 86% 87% 79% 78% 79% 76% 70% 72% 60% 70% 66%
New York 173% 211% 210% 207% 193% 198% 220% 217% 213% 209% 217% 188% 182% 208%
North Carolina 68% 70% 76% 71% 80% 76% 74% 73% 74% 76% 72% 63% 68% 68%
North Dakota 139% 131% 223% 197% 181% 115% 109% 108% 132% 110% 105% 96% 118% 121%
Ohio 88% 103% 99% 97% 105% 105% 104% 105% 106% 111% 105% 103% 92% 105%
Oklahoma 91% 102% 96% 103% 104% 102% 106% 102% 101% 99% 88% 70% 65% 75%
Oregon 88% 79% 79% 81% 85% 82% 83% 76% 79% 73% 71% 63% 66% 74%
Pennsylvania 124% 124% 127% 124% 124% 121% 119% 112% 117% 126% 111% 99% 106% 114%
Rhode Island 233% 192% 193% 197% 215% 190% 183% 211% 187% 207% 241% 185% 178% 87%
South Carolina 79% 68% 68% 70% 69% 70% 69% 68% 69% 75% 69% 63% 67% 35%
South Dakota 129% 149% 160% 150% 157% 118% 115% 125% 123% 143% 115% 96% 103% 75%
Tennessee 84% 85% 85% 84% 79% 84% 88% 81% 78% 92% 81% 70% 62% 32%
Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009 Page 94