Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...
Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...
Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
<strong>Office</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Economic</strong> and Demographic Research<br />
Table 4-4<br />
Corporation for National and Community Service Grants:<br />
States' Per Capita Expenditures as a Percentage <strong>of</strong> the National Per Capita Expenditure<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> Fiscal Years 1996 <strong>to</strong> 2009<br />
<strong>Federal</strong> FY 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009<br />
U.S. Per Cap. Exp. - - - - - - - $ 0.50 $ 0.38 $ 0.52 $ 0.51 $ 0.58 $ 0.62 $ 0.62<br />
Alabama - - - - - - - 9% 31% 41% 68% 83% 73% 64%<br />
Alaska - - - - - - - 588% 434% 456% 469% 451% 372% 590%<br />
Arizona - - - - - - - 122% 154% 103% 114% 99% 86% 82%<br />
Arkansas - - - - - - - 230% 248% 171% 172% 182% 183% 163%<br />
California - - - - - - - 186% 151% 276% 197% 168% 137% 125%<br />
Colorado - - - - - - - 166% 182% 105% 75% 176% 80% 93%<br />
Connecticut - - - - - - - 149% 152% 91% 106% 109% 95% 84%<br />
Delaware - - - - - - - 418% 423% 381% 386% 252% 322% 364%<br />
<strong>Florida</strong> No grant expenditures prior <strong>to</strong> 2003<br />
34% 26% 21% 70% 77% 67% 79%<br />
Georgia - - - - - - - 24% 27% 15% 20% 15% 5% 0%<br />
Hawaii - - - - - - - 122% 135% 172% 195% 121% 112% 137%<br />
Idaho - - - - - - - 337% 307% 229% 276% 229% 199% 178%<br />
Illinois - - - - - - - 13% 22% 4% 13% 20% 27% 22%<br />
Indiana - - - - - - - 10% 6% 1% 1% 15% 18% 20%<br />
Iowa - - - - - - - 14% 19% 13% 14% 12% 119% 171%<br />
Kansas - - - - - - - 227% 264% 174% 176% 137% 116% 120%<br />
Kentucky - - - - - - - 208% 198% 147% 157% 145% 146% 161%<br />
Louisiana - - - - - - - 0% 0% 0% 84% 259% 263% 237%<br />
Maine - - - - - - - 336% 405% 337% 397% 326% 338% 323%<br />
Maryland - - - - - - - 182% 502% 172% 216% 162% 198% 191%<br />
Massachusetts - - - - - - - 0% 0% 0% 66% 223% 252% 268%<br />
Michigan - - - - - - - 140% 101% 116% 121% 87% 110% 95%<br />
Minnesota - - - - - - - 0% 1% 2% 1% 1% 0% 0%<br />
Mississippi - - - - - - - 478% 488% 543% 443% 333% 430% 471%<br />
Missouri - - - - - - - 0% 0% 0% 23% 101% 85% 90%<br />
Montana - - - - - - - 641% 749% 717% 717% 611% 566% 634%<br />
Nebraska - - - - - - - 0% 0% 0% 57% 199% 165% 183%<br />
Nevada - - - - - - - 9% 13% 15% 5% 11% 95% 116%<br />
New Hampshire - - - - - - - 0% 0% 0% 52% 207% 232% 238%<br />
New Jersey - - - - - - - 113% 61% 109% 56% 148% 59% 100%<br />
New Mexico - - - - - - - 405% 205% 250% 128% 212% 162% 152%<br />
New York - - - - - - - 219% 187% 168% 224% 132% 156% 141%<br />
North Carolina - - - - - - - 13% 17% 10% 15% 12% 10% 11%<br />
North Dakota - - - - - - - 150% 266% 248% 295% 284% 235% 278%<br />
Ohio - - - - - - - 138% 163% 113% 121% 124% 97% 84%<br />
Oklahoma - - - - - - - 24% 31% 99% 22% 20% 18% 19%<br />
Oregon - - - - - - - 16% 21% 13% 1% 0% 0% 0%<br />
Pennsylvania - - - - - - - 13% 32% 15% 12% 7% 114% 116%<br />
Rhode Island - - - - - - - 59% 114% 68% 89% 75% 88% 87%<br />
South Carolina - - - - - - - 0% 0% 0% 28% 60% 50% 71%<br />
South Dakota - - - - - - - 30% 21% 18% 18% 9% 18% 22%<br />
Tennessee - - - - - - - 134% 135% 140% 120% 103% 94% 89%<br />
<strong>Review</strong> <strong>of</strong> <strong>Federal</strong> Funds <strong>to</strong> <strong>Florida</strong> in Fiscal Year 2009 Page 74