Review of Federal Funding to Florida - Office of Economic ...

Office of Economic and Demographic Research
Table 4-9
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Grants:
States' Per Capita Expenditures as a Percentage of the National Per Capita Expenditure
Federal Fiscal Years 1996 to 2009
Federal FY 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
U.S. Per Cap. Exp. $ 11.67 $ 10.94 $ 10.70 $ 11.46 $ 12.53 $ 13.58 $ 12.62 $ 13.73 $ 14.25 $ 11.21 $ 13.85 $ 13.75 $ 12.89 $ 11.60
Alabama 48% 71% 73% 60% 89% 85% 67% 59% 80% 104% 104% 78% 120% 73%
Alaska 335% 310% 669% 714% 1124% 726% 736% 872% 1088% 747% 749% 911% 1054% 1435%
Arizona 60% 58% 96% 101% 71% 101% 67% 53% 90% 70% 72% 82% 80% 89%
Arkansas 69% 84% 62% 44% 51% 54% 97% 89% 91% 100% 88% 100% 99% 99%
California 105% 77% 83% 69% 49% 70% 57% 52% 55% 63% 64% 76% 67% 55%
Colorado 61% 63% 83% 116% 126% 95% 96% 86% 90% 83% 79% 76% 81% 113%
Connecticut 76% 91% 87% 78% 73% 113% 88% 100% 59% 82% 113% 109% 99% 113%
Delaware 234% 256% 188% 153% 172% 177% 210% 156% 275% 261% 235% 323% 371% 267%
Florida 46% 48% 45% 55% 44% 49% 61% 58% 59% 49% 56% 58% 50% 39%
Georgia 41% 56% 57% 63% 53% 58% 43% 44% 69% 62% 54% 46% 64% 49%
Hawaii 127% 140% 106% 141% 143% 58% 220% 92% 71% 96% 166% 395% 213% 185%
Idaho 163% 140% 107% 186% 168% 187% 235% 176% 202% 239% 247% 246% 290% 388%
Illinois 70% 100% 62% 91% 89% 89% 89% 111% 91% 46% 54% 73% 63% 55%
Indiana 75% 81% 89% 91% 206% 221% 111% 55% 101% 35% 32% 114% 62% 69%
Iowa 118% 139% 120% 107% 123% 118% 170% 216% 163% 213% 197% 133% 149% 142%
Kansas 98% 111% 119% 132% 147% 103% 87% 110% 117% 118% 124% 78% 91% 105%
Kentucky 104% 107% 79% 81% 52% 59% 96% 91% 84% 90% 81% 130% 106% 139%
Louisiana 94% 85% 150% 112% 114% 85% 87% 70% 115% 85% 85% 99% 97% 95%
Maine 128% 154% 248% 227% 180% 158% 224% 257% 190% 211% 210% 199% 219% 322%
Maryland 140% 114% 141% 165% 125% 139% 155% 117% 122% 109% 109% 131% 123% 86%
Massachusetts 304% 362% 237% 206% 176% 168% 116% 165% 128% 137% 126% 106% 119% 113%
Michigan 134% 144% 153% 145% 161% 101% 104% 112% 106% 107% 111% 88% 119% 127%
Minnesota 71% 94% 70% 125% 178% 97% 121% 162% 92% 111% 100% 135% 81% 128%
Mississippi 92% 88% 93% 90% 96% 84% 135% 120% 129% 79% 96% 116% 123% 120%
Missouri 116% 93% 97% 143% 84% 116% 121% 169% 128% 117% 109% 128% 103% 104%
Montana 160% 179% 239% 275% 280% 265% 365% 435% 306% 317% 322% 301% 399% 465%
Nebraska 137% 124% 121% 123% 139% 153% 162% 89% 165% 134% 130% 102% 113% 178%
Nevada 68% 66% 68% 76% 121% 113% 90% 119% 87% 184% 169% 93% 102% 92%
New Hampshire 79% 122% 231% 262% 248% 153% 183% 225% 197% 200% 193% 174% 202% 231%
New Jersey 104% 96% 90% 62% 76% 74% 115% 115% 124% 165% 149% 100% 107% 102%
New Mexico 97% 151% 124% 117% 140% 142% 205% 237% 159% 147% 152% 192% 230% 159%
New York 153% 167% 144% 52% 145% 156% 114% 103% 119% 127% 109% 86% 93% 81%
North Carolina 69% 74% 64% 70% 74% 72% 99% 69% 76% 97% 100% 80% 77% 106%
North Dakota 177% 190% 272% 397% 217% 345% 402% 512% 299% 362% 402% 514% 416% 462%
Ohio 122% 62% 86% 108% 100% 114% 93% 78% 102% 120% 114% 96% 88% 102%
Oklahoma 90% 103% 123% 137% 90% 123% 123% 121% 117% 116% 134% 147% 128% 221%
Oregon 60% 76% 133% 238% 136% 83% 127% 116% 128% 130% 124% 79% 114% 148%
Pennsylvania 85% 73% 93% 86% 87% 88% 104% 91% 89% 85% 86% 101% 99% 78%
Rhode Island 144% 159% 192% 175% 177% 179% 226% 272% 219% 251% 224% 232% 207% 173%
South Carolina 64% 71% 41% 97% 108% 97% 71% 77% 78% 98% 94% 61% 66% 74%
South Dakota 176% 297% 242% 275% 245% 200% 220% 353% 331% 366% 360% 243% 255% 286%
Tennessee 62% 79% 72% 61% 56% 46% 51% 61% 81% 95% 94% 53% 63% 58%
Review of Federal Funding to Florida in Fiscal Year 2009 Page 84