Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 146 honest. : : : : Furthermore, I refuse to defend myself or any other pro-lifer I know : : : : against charges of sexism. : : : : : that makes sense. it wouldn’t work anyway. : : : : Once again, you conveniently deleted what came next. For those who did : : not read my previous article, I went on to say that any woman I know (even : : those who are pro-choice) know that I am not a sexist. Fortunately, : : my friends are open-minded. Mr. Keegan obviously is not. He seems to : : have a litmus test to determine a person’s level of mysogyny. : what level of misogyny do you assign someone who wishes : to control women? Throughout this thread, I have never claimed that Mr. Keegan wants to kill babies. I have tried to remain civil and stick to the facts. Mr. Keegan, on the other hand, simply resorts to name-calling. I *truly* do not believe that Mr. Keegan wants to kill babies. I would never stoop that low. Some others, like Randall Terry, make these charges. RT makes me ill. He is the worst possible thing that could happen to the pro-life movement. What I don’t understand is why Mr. Keegan insists on using one issue to determine if a person is sexist. There are many women whose lives are in no way affected by their right to an abortion. What about them? Am I a sexist if I defend their rights in the workplace? Am I a sexist if I supported the Equal Rights Amendment? Am I a sexist if I support family leave and increased access to child care? Am I a sexist if I help a friend who is in a battered women’s shelter? Does all of this indicate wanting to control women? Why do you insist on making everything black and white. Life is never that simple. : : Sexism is never that simple. : i imagine you’ve developed some good excuses for yours. See above paragraph. I will no longer defend myself against these ludicrous charges made by people who would rather demonize the opposition than admit that those who disagree may have good reasons for their beliefs. : -- : "A woman’s rights to her body should stop where : the fetus’s body begins." : Ray Fischer -- ============================================================================= Robert Huck rohuck@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu "That’s 6-4-3 if you’re scoring at home and even if you’re by yourself." Keith Olbermann Article 29 Reference 161478 From BGibbins@harris.com Date Tue, Aug 2, 1994 7:02 PM
APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 147 In article , ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) wrote: > >Easy. If you steal a 4 carat sapphire and swallow it, you gain _no_ >rights over it merely because it is now a content of your body. The >rightful owner retains all rights to it. > Yes, but did you (or you and partner) actually conceive that sapphire? No! The sapphire belonged to somebody else, you stole it and swallowed it. I don’t see that you can compare these two things. If you are an oyster and the object in question was a pearl you could, but that not what was stated was it? -- Brian ------ Article 30 Reference 161404 From jrmo@prpix2.pr.att.com Date Tue, Aug 2, 1994 7:40 PM Jeff Kirvin writes: >Prove that a >=3 month fetus is a sentient human being and not simply >a bag of tissues with the potential to _become_ a human being. Prove that a full grown Jewish descended figerum is a human being and not simply a bag of tissues that would like to be a human being. Prove that a full grown negro slave is a human being and not a possesion of a landowner, an animal, a beast of burden. To what extent are we allowed to impose our values and opinions on those who do not consider Jews or blacks to be real human beings. Joe Moore Article 31 Reference 161488 From frkorze@srv.PacBell.COM Date Tue, Aug 2, 1994 7:54 PM In article ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes: #keegan@helios.acm.rpi.edu (james g. keegan jr.) writes ... #>John Walkup wrote: #>: Criminy. For the last time: Pro-life supporters are NOT attempting #>: to legislate against anyone’s RIGHTS. #> #>prove that persons do not ahve the right to their #>bodies and the contents of their bodies. # #Easy. If you steal a 4 carat sapphire and swallow it, you gain _no_
Page 1 and 2:
Expanding the Public Sphere through
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Acknowledgements 7 1 Compu
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures 3.1 Structure of a
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements When one takes eig
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER 1. COMPUTERS, CONVERSATION
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 15 2.1
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 17 Sch
Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 19 sta
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 21 or
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 23 own
Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 25 new
Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 27 com
Page 29 and 30:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 29 Hab
Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 31 pub
Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 33 the
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 35 ori
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 37 gen
Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 39 pub
Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 41 By
Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3 Technology & the Public S
Page 45 and 46:
CHAPTER 3. TECHNOLOGY & THE PUBLIC
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 4 Abortion Discourse in the
Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 4. ABORTION DISCOURSE IN TH
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 5 Measuring the Public Sphe
Page 71 and 72:
CHAPTER 5. MEASURING THE PUBLIC SPH
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96: CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
Page 101 and 102: Chapter 7 The Expanding Public Sphe
Page 103 and 104: CHAPTER 7. THE EXPANDING PUBLIC SPH
Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 7. THE EXPANDING PUBLIC SPH
Page 107 and 108: Appendix A The talk.abortion newsgr
Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
Page 145: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
Page 163 and 164: Appendix B Density Scores Table B.1
Page 165 and 166: APPENDIX B. DENSITY SCORES 165 Tabl
Page 167 and 168: Appendix C Supplemental Analysis 16
Page 169 and 170: APPENDIX C. SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS 1
Page 177 and 178: BIBLIOGRAPHY 177 Best, Michael L. 1
Page 179 and 180: BIBLIOGRAPHY 179 Fisher, Bonnie, Mi
Page 181 and 182: BIBLIOGRAPHY 181 Hiltz, Starr Roxan
Page 183 and 184: BIBLIOGRAPHY 183 Mansbridge, Jane.
Page 185 and 186: BIBLIOGRAPHY 185 Pateman, Carole. 1
Page 187 and 188: BIBLIOGRAPHY 187 Savicki, Victor, D
Page 189: BIBLIOGRAPHY 189 U. S. Congress, Of
show all

Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?