Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 155<br />
>>since 1973?<br />
In article , kevin@rotag.mi.org (Kevin<br />
Darcy) wrote:<br />
>Illegitimacy rates were starting to skyrocket long before 1973 -- we’re just<br />
>seeing <strong>the</strong> continuation of a long-term trend.<br />
Could <strong>the</strong> two of you please define what "illegitimacy" means? When<br />
watching <strong>the</strong> 6pm news <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r night I found a newscaster in error (and I<br />
called <strong>the</strong> station). She said that "children born to unwed mo<strong>the</strong>rs have<br />
gone up (something like) 75% in <strong>the</strong> past 10 (or so) years". Then she made<br />
a comment that it was "sad that so many children lived with only one<br />
parent". Those two only have limited connection. Not all women who are<br />
single are NOT living with <strong>the</strong> fa<strong>the</strong>r. It just means that <strong>the</strong>y are<br />
unmarried. The woman is forced to list her marital status on <strong>the</strong> hospital<br />
admission papers, <strong>the</strong>n this information becomes a part of <strong>the</strong> "public"<br />
record where it is <strong>the</strong>n misinterpreted.<br />
BTW, not a flame.<br />
entirely accurate.<br />
I’m just pointing out that those figures are not<br />
Bright Blessings<br />
--<br />
Brian<br />
------<br />
Article 44<br />
Reference 161829<br />
From reddeg@VAX309.NHRC.NAVY.MIL<br />
Date Thu, Aug 4, 1994 1:31 PM<br />
You said:<br />
>It is very easy to portray pro-lifers in <strong>the</strong> worst manner possible. That is<br />
>it is easy if you ignore facts. I mentioned this in a posting on ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
>thread, but it bears repeating here. You say that "<strong>the</strong>re are no ’defenseless<br />
>children’ killed in an abortion". Prove it. Offer concrete medical<br />
>evidence to support your claim. I will not engage in name calling or<br />
>sloganeering. I wish to discuss only facts that can be proved by<br />
>scientific methods. In this spirit, I offer <strong>the</strong> following incontrovertable<br />
>scientific/medical evidence.<br />
><br />
>1) It is impossible for one person to have two blood types. When a woman<br />
>is pregnant, she has her blood type and <strong>the</strong> unborn child has her or his<br />
>blood type. In <strong>the</strong> case of fraternal twins, <strong>the</strong>re can be three different<br />
>blood types.<br />
><br />
>2) It is impossible for one person to have 46 pairs of chromosones. When<br />
>a woman is pregnant, she has <strong>the</strong> 23 pairs of chromosones she received<br />
>from her parents at conception and <strong>the</strong> unborn child has his or her 23<br />
>pairs (24 in <strong>the</strong> case of children with Down’s Syndrome) of<br />
>chromosones.<br />
><br />
>3) It is impossible for one person to have two hearts beating at different