Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 151
>Prove that a >=3 month fetus is a sentient human being and not simply
>a bag of tissues with the potential to _become_ a human being.
Prove to me that you are a sentient human being and not just a bag
of tissues with a somewhat complex system of organization (or for that
matter a computer program cleverly trained to mimic a human pro-choicer).
We are all just bags of tissues, friend.
BTW, are you endorsing restrictions on post-first-trimester abortions?
--
Charles P. Kalina, Lizard King of the Universe
"If women ran the world, there would be no wars. Instead, nations would
tease each other until they developed eating disorders."
My opinions are my own, but they should be everyone’s... :-)
Article 37
Reference 161510
From jrmo@prpix2.pr.att.com
Date Wed, Aug 3, 1994 1:44 PM
Lisa Ann Kazmier writes:
>Simply put, this group wishes by government action to compell
>any woman to take her pregnancy to term. Even when the law did
>so, many women sought ways around this, for their own reasons,
>which were numerous and cannot be classifed as typically
>convenience or economics or anything else. It seems the message
>is "we’ll leave you alone -- after you have the child." But by
>then that woman’s life is undeniably altered, whether or not
>she raises the baby.
Simply put, this group wishes by government action to compel
doctors to preserve human life. When the law did so, doctors
and quacks illegally performed procedures that undeniably
eliminated human lives for convenience or economics or something
else. This group doesn’t wish to compel women to breed. By
her own actions, the woman’s life is undeniably altered whether
or not she aborts or brings the child to term.
Joe Moore
Article 38
Article161522
From jrmo@prpix2.pr.att.com
Date Wed, Aug 3, 1994 2:02 PM
Jim C writes:
>I’m also well aware that in Puritan
>New England it was perfectly legal to kill your children until they were 16,
Well we certainly don’t want to intrude into people’s lives, I suggest we
return to the pro-choice stand and allow parents to raise (or kill)
their children as they choose. No one choice is right for all people.
What if they are poor and can’t afford the child? What if the child is
retarded? What if the child gets D’s in school? Not only should we
repeal all the child abuse laws and child murder laws, because children