03.09.2014 Views

Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

CHAPTER 5. MEASURING THE PUBLIC SPHERE 74<br />

of constraints imposed on <strong>the</strong> participants. Diversity is assessed at two levels: <strong>the</strong><br />

overall newsgroup, and within <strong>the</strong> newsgroup.<br />

Tractability measures <strong>the</strong> degree to which <strong>the</strong> volume or size of a public sphere<br />

zone changes on a day to day basis. High tractability would suggest that participants<br />

contract and expand <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong>ir public sphere according to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

own needs and desires. Low tractability would suggest ei<strong>the</strong>r low needs or desires<br />

to alter <strong>the</strong> size of <strong>the</strong> group, or external forces preventing <strong>the</strong> size from<br />

being altered. Tractability measures <strong>the</strong> capability of a medium to expand and<br />

contract depending on information flows. For example, <strong>the</strong> network news hole is<br />

30 minutes, news or no news. But television networks have tractability by being<br />

able to do special live broadcasts, or to break in to o<strong>the</strong>r programming with really<br />

important news. On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, network news is not contractable, so <strong>the</strong><br />

volume of news has a defined floor. Newsgroups, of course, expand and contract<br />

regularly over time, without being out of <strong>the</strong> ordinary. Tractability is measured<br />

by <strong>the</strong> number of days featuring messages outside <strong>the</strong> normal bounds of activity.<br />

High tractability would suggest a high level of diversity. The second aspect of<br />

diversity measures <strong>the</strong> presence of multiple conversational patterns within threads<br />

of messages. These patterns are measured by <strong>the</strong> number of messages within a<br />

thread, <strong>the</strong> spread of days associated with <strong>the</strong> thread’s existence, <strong>the</strong> number of<br />

days on which messages were posted, and <strong>the</strong> number and type of authors posting<br />

messages. Diverse patterns would suggest that participants take advantage of<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir ability to shape <strong>the</strong> nature of <strong>the</strong>ir conversations; a lack of diversity would<br />

suggest ei<strong>the</strong>r low desire, or external forces preventing participants from shaping<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir conversations.<br />

Reciprocity refers to <strong>the</strong> notion that people are engaged in conversation with each<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r, and that <strong>the</strong>ir messages are reflected upon and discussed by o<strong>the</strong>rs. A message<br />

is considered reciprocal to a previous message if it appears in <strong>the</strong> same thread<br />

within seven days of <strong>the</strong> previous message, or if it cites <strong>the</strong> message directly by<br />

message identification number. Authors are considered to have a reciprocal relationship<br />

if <strong>the</strong>ir messages are reciprocated. The primary indicators of reciprocity<br />

are based on authors, and measured in terms of messages and o<strong>the</strong>r authors. In<br />

<strong>the</strong> idealized public sphere, reciprocity would be maximized: that is, each author<br />

would establish a reciprocal relationship with every o<strong>the</strong>r author. Reciprocity is<br />

operationalized as <strong>the</strong> proportion of authors with whom a reciprocal relationship<br />

is established, and <strong>the</strong> number of authors which <strong>the</strong> average message reciprocates.<br />

The final dimension concerns quality. Quality in <strong>the</strong> informal zone of <strong>the</strong> public

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!