Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

More documents

Recommendations

Info

APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 156 >rates. > >4) It is impossible for one person to have two different sets of finger- >prints. > >5) It is impossible for one person to have two brains. > >6) It is impossible for one person to have four eyes (six if the woman >is pregnant with twins, eight with triplets, and so on). > >Considering all of the above, we have no choice but to conclude that >abortion kills a person. > >Do you get my point? Please address these specific, provable medical >facts. If you do not wish to discuss these issues, then do not bother >to respond. I refuse to throw labels and insults. Stick to the facts. >Furthermore, I refuse to defend myself or any other pro-lifer I know >against charges of sexism. If you wish to believe I am a sexist, so >be it. Any of the women I know will disagree with you on this (even >the women I know who are pro-choice). Their opinion is much more >important to me than yours is. If you do respond, >respond to the issues I have addressed. You may disagree with me, but >if you do, have the courtesy to offer concrete evidence to support >your assertion that the unborn child is not human. If not, why not? >My family is from Missouri - show me. > I say: I have been involved in pro-choice activities for years, and I have YET to have an answer to what I feel is the real question: WHAT GIVES ANY ONE THE RIGHT TO TELL ME WHAT TO DO WITH MY LIFE, MY BODY, AND MY DECISIONS? Article 45 Reference 161833 From waynet@indirect.com Date Thu, Aug 4, 1994 2:25 PM Joe Moore (jrmo@prpix2.pr.att.com) wrote: : Lisa Ann Kazmier writes: : >Simply put, this group wishes by government action to compell : >any woman to take her pregnancy to term. Even when the law did : >so, many women sought ways around this, for their own reasons, : >which were numerous and cannot be classifed as typically : >convenience or economics or anything else. It seems the message : >is "we’ll leave you alone -- after you have the child." But by : >then that woman’s life is undeniably altered, whether or not : >she raises the baby. : Simply put, this group wishes by government action to compel : doctors to preserve human life. When the law did so, doctors : and quacks illegally performed procedures that undeniably : eliminated human lives for convenience or economics or something : else. This group doesn’t wish to compel women to breed. By
APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9, 1994 157 : her own actions, the woman’s life is undeniably altered whether : or not she aborts or brings the child to term. But why do you think YOU should be the one to decide HOW her life is altered? ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Wayne (waynet@indirect.com) "My ancestors were Puritans from England. They arrived here in 1648 in the hope of finding greater restrictions than were permissible under English law at that time." - Garrison Keillor ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Article 46 Reference 161844 From n-peal@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu Date Thu, Aug 4, 1994 3:39 PM pcrotty@UWYO.EDU writes: >In article , ray@netcom.com (Ray Fischer) writes: >>prc@physics.physics.wm.edu (Patrick Crotty) writes ... >>> n-peal@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (peal nora c) writes: >> >>>>Why is the life of a fetus more important than the >>>>life of a woman? >>> >>>It’s not. It’s not any *less* important, either. Women generally do not >>>die during childbirth, so having a baby is usually not a threat to the >>>woman’s life. >> >>Having a baby is always a threat to a woman’s life, and always causes >>some injury. Why should a fetus have more rights to a woman’s body >>than does the woman herself? >Umm.....I am, to say the *least*, confused. Did you yourself not say >something along the lines of "A woman’s right to her body should end >where the fetus begins", or something to that effect? Yup. You’re right...he did. You’re not alone in your confusion, however...people on t.a. have been trying to get Ray to explain his abortion restriction views for months and months. >>>>I’d say they are very fortunate. I’d also say >>>>they should be thankful to currently have the >>>>freedom to make that extremely personal choice for >>>>themselves. >>> >>>Too bad their unborn child doesn’t have any say in the matter..... >> >>Just as poor people, even those dying, have no say in what you may do >>with your property. >> >>>>I can see how those acts would help women. How would banning >>>>abortion help women? >>>
Page 1 and 2:
Expanding the Public Sphere through
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Acknowledgements 7 1 Compu
Page 5 and 6:
List of Figures 3.1 Structure of a
Page 7 and 8:
Acknowledgements When one takes eig
Page 9 and 10:
CHAPTER 1. COMPUTERS, CONVERSATION
Page 11 and 12:
Page 13 and 14:
Page 15 and 16:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 15 2.1
Page 17 and 18:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 17 Sch
Page 19 and 20:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 19 sta
Page 21 and 22:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 21 or
Page 23 and 24:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 23 own
Page 25 and 26:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 25 new
Page 27 and 28:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 27 com
Page 29 and 30:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 29 Hab
Page 31 and 32:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 31 pub
Page 33 and 34:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 33 the
Page 35 and 36:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 35 ori
Page 37 and 38:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 37 gen
Page 39 and 40:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 39 pub
Page 41 and 42:
CHAPTER 2. THE PUBLIC SPHERE 41 By
Page 43 and 44:
Chapter 3 Technology & the Public S
Page 45 and 46:
CHAPTER 3. TECHNOLOGY & THE PUBLIC
Page 47 and 48:
Page 49 and 50:
Page 51 and 52:
Page 53 and 54:
Page 55 and 56:
Page 57 and 58:
Chapter 4 Abortion Discourse in the
Page 59 and 60:
CHAPTER 4. ABORTION DISCOURSE IN TH
Page 61 and 62:
Page 63 and 64:
Page 65 and 66:
Page 67 and 68:
Page 69 and 70:
Chapter 5 Measuring the Public Sphe
Page 71 and 72:
CHAPTER 5. MEASURING THE PUBLIC SPH
Page 73 and 74:
Page 75 and 76:
Page 77 and 78:
CHAPTER 6. ANALYZING THE TALK.ABORT
Page 79 and 80:
Page 81 and 82:
Page 83 and 84:
Page 85 and 86:
Page 87 and 88:
Page 89 and 90:
Page 91 and 92:
Page 93 and 94:
Page 95 and 96:
Page 97 and 98:
Page 99 and 100:
Page 101 and 102:
Chapter 7 The Expanding Public Sphe
Page 103 and 104:
CHAPTER 7. THE EXPANDING PUBLIC SPH
Page 105 and 106: CHAPTER 7. THE EXPANDING PUBLIC SPH
Page 107 and 108: Appendix A The talk.abortion newsgr
Page 109 and 110: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
Page 155: APPENDIX A. TALK.ABORTION: AUGUST 9
Page 163 and 164: Appendix B Density Scores Table B.1
Page 165 and 166: APPENDIX B. DENSITY SCORES 165 Tabl
Page 167 and 168: Appendix C Supplemental Analysis 16
Page 169 and 170: APPENDIX C. SUPPLEMENTAL ANALYSIS 1
Page 177 and 178: BIBLIOGRAPHY 177 Best, Michael L. 1
Page 179 and 180: BIBLIOGRAPHY 179 Fisher, Bonnie, Mi
Page 181 and 182: BIBLIOGRAPHY 181 Hiltz, Starr Roxan
Page 183 and 184: BIBLIOGRAPHY 183 Mansbridge, Jane.
Page 185 and 186: BIBLIOGRAPHY 185 Pateman, Carole. 1
Page 187 and 188: BIBLIOGRAPHY 187 Savicki, Victor, D
Page 189: BIBLIOGRAPHY 189 U. S. Congress, Of
show all

Expanding the Public Sphere through Computer ... - ResearchGate

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?